DEAR FRIENDS, CONGRATS, YOUR BLOG CROSSED 4507481 HITS ON 29.03.2026THE BLOG WAS LAUNCHED ON 23.11.2014,HAVE A GREAT DAY
VISIT 'PENSIONERS VOICE & SOUND TRACK' WAY TO CATCH UP ON PENSIONER RELATED NEWS!

Saturday, 16 December 2017

HINDU RITUAL

BUDGET 2019 :SUGGESTION FOR SALARY INCOME | SIMPLE TAX INDIA

BUDGET 2019 :SUGGESTION FOR SALARY INCOME | SIMPLE TAX INDIA: In India most honest Tax payer is Salaried person , All his tax due on salary is required to be deducted by his employer and no expense is...

Revision Gratuity Ceiling to Rs. 20 Lakh from 1st January 2016

Revision Gratuity Ceiling to Rs. 20 Lakh from 1st January 2016

Retired Railways Employees up to the age of 65 Years can be re-engaged now

Being repetitive might be an early sign of Dementia

Being repetitive might be an early sign of Dementia      http://www.abplive.in/world-news/being-repetitive-might-be-an-early-sign-of-dementia-619305      -Shared via ABP Live App 


Gujarat exit poll: Journalists predict BJP govt in state, Congress to improve tally

Gujarat exit poll: Journalists predict BJP govt in state, Congress to improve tally      http://www.abplive.in/india-news/gujarat-election-exit-poll-30-journalists-predict-winner-of-gujarat-619135      -Shared via ABP Live App 


7th Pre-Budget Consultation

The Union Minister of Finance and Corporate Affairs, Shri Arun Jaitley held his 7th Pre-Budget Consultation Meeting with the representatives of the Banks and Financial Institutions (FIs) in national capital yesterday;

FM: In order to strengthen the banks, which are the key pillars of the economy, the Central Government has decided to take a massive step to recapitalize the Public Sector Banks (PSBs) in a front-loaded manner which in turn would help in credit growth and job creation among others.

The Union Minister of Finance and Corporate Affairs, Shri Arun Jaitley said that in order to strengthen the banks, which are the key pillars of the economy, the Central Government has decided to take a massive step to recapitalize the Public Sector Banks (PSBs) in a front-loaded manner. He said that the Government has decided to infuse capital worth Rs.2.11 lakh crore in PSBs in next two years through budgetary provisions of Rs.18,139 crore, and Rs. 1,35,000 crore through Re-capitalisation Bonds, and the balance through raising of capital by banks from the market. The Finance Minister Shri Arun Jaitley was making the Opening Remarks during his 7thPre-Budget Consultation Meeting with the representatives of the Banks and the Financial Institutions (FIs) in the national capital here today. The Finance Minister, Jaitley said that capital adequacy of the banks will help in credit growth and job creation among others.

 Along with the Union Finance Minister Shri Jaitley, the Pre-Budget Consultation Meeting was also attended among others by both the Ministers of State, Shri S.P Shukla and Shri Pon Radhakrishnan,  Dr. Hasmukh Adhia, Finance Secretary, Shri A.N. Jha, Secretary, Expenditure, Shri Subhash Chandra Garg, Secretary (Economic Affairs), Shri Rajiv Kumar, Secretary (DFS), Shri Sushil Kumar Chandra, Chairman, CBDT, Shri Sanjeev Sanyal, Principal Economic Adviser (PEA), and other senior officers of the Ministry of Finance.

Stakeholders representing the Banking and Financial Institutions who attended today's meeting included Shri N.S. Vishwanathan, Deputy Governor, Reserve Bank of India, Shri Jatinder Bir Singh, Chairman Indian Banks Association, Shri Rajnish Kumar, Chairman SBI, Shri Ashwani Kumar, Chairman & Managing Director, Dena Bank, Ms. Chanda Kochhar, MD & CEO, ICICI, Shri Rajeev Rishi, CMD, Central Bank of India, Shri Mahesh Kumar Jain, MD &CEO, IDBI Bank Ltd., Shri H K Bhanwala,  Chairman, NABARD, Shri Sunil Kakar, MD & CEO, IDFC Limited Ms. Sunita Sharma, Managing Director, LIC of India, Ms. Shikha Sharma, MD&CEO, AXIS Bank, Shri Aditya Puri, Managing Director, HDFC Bank Ltd., Shri Chandra Shekhar Ghosh, MD & CEO, Bandhan Bank, Shri Adhil Shetty, CEO, Bank Bazaar, Shri M.G. George Muthoot, Chairman,The Muthoot Group, Shri N. S. Venkatesh, Chief Executive, Association of Mutual Funds in India (AMFI), Shri Raman Aggarwal, Chairman, Finance Industry Development Council (FIDC), Shri Milind Kamble, Chairman, Dalit Indian Chamber of Commerce and Industry (DICCI), Shri Yashish Dahiya, CEO, Policybazaar, Shri Uday Kotak, Vice Chairman & MD, Kotak Mahindra Bank, Shri Rashesh Shah, Chairman & CEO, Edelweiss Group, and Shri  Vijay Mahajan, Chairman Basix- Microfinance among others.

Various suggestions were given by the representatives of the Banking and Financial Institutions. It was suggested that TDS limit for Bank interest should be raised from the current Rs.10,000/- especially for senior citizens and pensioners given the current scenario. The limit of Rs.10,000/- was last set in the year 1997. It was also suggested to have a Credit Guarantee Fund to encourage investment in Agriculture Sector.

It was suggested that premium up to Rs. 1 lakh on life Insurance policies be exempted from income tax.

Small and Marginal farmers have come together to form FPOs rather than Cooperatives – should get the same benefits as those of companies; Incentives should be given for investments to promote agriculture and infrastructure; Crop Insurance benefits and interest subvention on agriculture credit be given through DBT to avoid misuse; Incentives for incremental jobs among others.

Among other suggestions include to encourage affordable housing, even rental properties need to be given tax benefits; Time limit of recognition of bad debts should be aligned – RBI gives 180days and IT Act 90 days; Monthly reporting by banks to Income Tax  Department should be waived – only annual reporting;

It was suggested to incentivise digital transactions to make 2018 as a year of Paperless Access to Finance; it was suggested to extend the date of Masala Bond TDS which expires in June 2018 among others.

                                                                 *******

DSM/SBS

ASSOCHAM asks govt to remove bail-in from FRDI Bill, says bank deposits only financial security of pensioners

ASSOCHAM said on Thursday that the government's assurance to protect the depositors' interest in case a bank lands up in trouble needs to be spelt out clearly and unambiguously in the Financial Resolution and Deposit Insurance (FRDI) Bill. It also mentioned that the clause that seeks to treat depositors as other creditors and shareholders for bail-in must be removed.

In a statement, the chamber said that that particular clause has raised doubt and panic among bank depositors. ASSOCHAM Secretary General DS Rawat said that the concept of "bail-in" especially by depositors should be completely done away in the Indian context, and their money has to be protected at any cost. "Otherwise, the trust in the banking system runs the risk of being eroded and the savings by the households would find way into unproductive avenues like real estate, gold, jewellery and even in the unorganised and informal financial markets run by unscrupulous people," Rawat added.

Rawat also added that most middle class families, pensioners and other elderly people usually don't have any other form of social security. In such, bank deposits are their only financial security. On top of that, the rising cost of healthcare is also a blow to the middle class. Any move, hence, to copy the Western model of bail-in must be avoided, he said.

The intention behind the clause is simply to indicate that the government should not be the one always taking the hit for a bail-out of a bank in trouble. Shareholders and other stake holders, which would also include depositors – above the limit of insured amount – should also be responsible for saving a financial entity.

The government's assurance notwithstanding, Sub-section 7 of Section 52 of the proposed law mentions that the bail-in shall not be applicable to deposits to the extent only covered by insurance. The sub-section says, "The bail-in instrument or scheme under this section shall not affect- (a) any liability owed by a specified service provider to the depositors to the extent such deposits are covered by deposit insurance."

However, currently deposits are covered only upto Rs 1 lakh, which is a meagre sum for families keeping savings of their entire lifetime in the banks.

Source: BT

आधार (Aadhaar) पर सुप्रीम कोर्ट से राहत, अब 31 मार्च तक बैंक खाते-मोबाइल नंबर कर सकेंगे लिंक

आधार (Aadhaar) पर सुप्रीम कोर्ट से राहत, अब 31 मार्च तक बैंक खाते-मोबाइल नंबर कर सकेंगे लिंक

केंद्र और राज्य सरकारों द्वारा जारी विभिन्न अधिसूचनाओं में आधार (Aadhaar) को विभिन्न योजनाओं जैसे छात्रों द्वारा दी जानेवाली परीक्षा, छात्रवृत्ति, अंतिम संस्कार और एचआईवी मरीजों के इलाज के लिए अनिवार्य बनाने के खिलाफ अंतरिम राहत की मांग करने वाली कई याचिकाओं पर सुप्रीम कोर्ट शुक्रवार को सुनवाई की. इस दौरान सुप्रीम कोर्ट  ने आम आदमी को बड़ी  राहत देते हुए आधार को लिंक करने की डेडलाइन 31 मार्च  तक बढ़ा दी है. आधार की वैधता को लेकर 17 जनवरी से सुप्रीम कोर्ट सुनवाई करेगा.

बिना आधार खोल सकेंगे बैंक अकाउंट

सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने कहा कि नये बैंक खाते बिना आधार कार्ड (Aadhaar Card) के खोले जा सकते हैं. हालांकि बैंक खाते खुलवाने को ये जरूर बताना हेागा कि उसने आधार कार्ड हासिल करने के लिए अप्लाई कर दिया है.

मोबाइल नंबर लिंक करने के लिए भी मिला समय

सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने भी ये साफ किया है कि मोबाइल नंबर को आधार कार्ड से लिंक करने की प्रक्रिया पर भी उसका ये फैसला लागू होगा. इसका मतलब यह है कि अब मोबाइल नंबर को भी 31 मार्च तक Aadhaar लिंक करने का समय मिल गया है. बता दें कि पहले इसके लिए 6 फरवरी की डेडलाइन तय थी.

सरकार ने अभी तक आधार को विभिन्न योजनाओं से जोड़ने को लेकर कुल 139 अधिसूचनाएं जारी की है, जिसमें इसे मनरेगा से लेकर पेंशन योजना और प्रोविडेंड फंड से लेकर प्रधानमंत्री जन धन योजना तक को जोड़ने का निर्देश दिया गया है.

बढ़ गई है डेडलाइन
बता दें कि सुप्रीम कोर्ट के फैसले से पहले ही केंद्र सरकार  बैंक खातों समेत अन्य कई योजनाओं के लिए आधार कार्ड ल‍िंक करने की डेडलाइन को 31 मार्च  तक बढ़ा चुकी है.

सुप्रीम कोर्ट के मुख्य न्यायाधीश दीपक मिश्रा की अगुवाई में पांच न्यायाधीशों की संवैधानिक पीठ ने इस मामले में राहत की मांग को लेकर गुरुवार और शुक्रवार को सुनवाई की. इसमें विभिन्न याचिकाकर्ताओं ने आधार को निजता के अधिकार का मौलिक अधिकार का उल्लंघन बताते हुए चुनौती दी थी, जिस पर नियमित सुनवाई अगले साल 10 जनवरी से शुरू होगी.

अटॉर्नी जनरल के. के. वेणुगोपाल ने अदालत से कहा कि नए बैंक खाता खोलने के लिए आधार को जोड़ने की अनुमति दी जाए. वहीं, याचिकाकर्ताओं के वकील ने कहा कि किसी वर्तमान खाता धारक द्वारा नए खाता धारक के परिचय की प्रणाली पिछले सात दशकों से चल रही है, तो अगले तीन महीनों तक इसे जारी रखने की अनुमति देने से कोई आसमान नहीं टूट पड़ेगा.

THOUGHT OF THE DAY FW ERI BOI

THOUGHT OF THE DA
Regards, E.R.Iyer

Cabinet approves subsidizing MDR charges on debit card/BHIM UPI/AePS transactions of value less than Rs.2000

Press Information Bureau 
Government of India
Cabinet
15-December-2017 17:23 IST
Cabinet approves subsidizing MDR charges on debit card/BHIM UPI/AePS transactions of value less than Rs.2000 

The Union Cabinet chaired by Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi has approved that the Merchant Discount Rate (MDR) applicable on all debit card/BHIM UPI/ Aadhaar enabled Payment System (AePS) transactions upto and including a value of Rs. 2000 will be borne by the Government for a period of two years with effect from 1st January, 2018 by reimbursing the same to the banks. 

A Committee comprising of Secretary Department of Financial Services, Secretary Ministry of Electronics & I.T. and the CEO, National Payment Corporation of India (NPCI) will look into the industry cost structure of such transactions which will form the basis to determine the levels of reimbursement. 

As a result of this approval, for all transactions less than Rs. 2000 in value, the consumer and the merchant will not suffer any additional burden in the form of MDR thereby leading to greater adoption of digital payment modes for such transactions. Since such transactions account for sizeable percentage of transaction volume, it will help to move towards a less cash economy. 

It is estimated that the MDR to be reimbursed to the banks in respect of transactions less than Rs.2000 in value would be Rs.1,050 crore in FY 2018-19 and Rs.1,462 crore in FY 2019-20. 

When payment is made at a merchant point of sale, MDR is payable by the merchant to the bank. Citing this, many people make cash payments inspite of having debit cards. Similarly, MDR is charged on payments made to merchants through BHIM UPI platform and AePS. 

*****
AKT/VBA/SH

Friday, 15 December 2017

Mr Asthana's Post

Who can forget Mr Asthana' initiating the legal fight in 1998? And who can forget the fiasco suffered at Jaipur on 14/02/2014 when he withdrew the Contempt Petition and repeatedly denied the fact of  his withdrawal.No doubt he was successful till the time the Review Petition of LIC was dismissed by the Division Bench at Jaipur on 21/1/2011,but not beyond that.The whole lot of pensioners rallied behind Mr Asthana even going to the extent of sending liberal contributions to the personal  Bank account of Mr Asthana.The pensioner friends however had no transparent information on how the case was being managed.But  after the cases were remitted to DHC on 31/3/2016,there was more transparency on how the  cases proceeded at Delhi HC.
Mr Asthana claims that his case was referred to DHC.But he must remember two other cases were also referred to DHC along with his WP.So he cannot claim proprietary rights to the case when other cases are tagged with his.And then,how active was Mr Asthana in the DHC proceedings?It is for the pensioners to judge.
On the formation of Legal Committee,does Mr Asthana think that he is larger than a group of legally qualified individuals?
Let not Mr Asthana bask in the glory of the Jaipur judgment which is now history.What matters now is how the six  SLPs are going to be decided in the Supreme Court.
As regards the repercussions of his withdrawal from the legal fight,let not Mr Asthana be under the illusion that there will be end of the world.There are five other  SLP petitioners ,who can take care of  the interest of their constituents.If Mr Asthana drops out,no doubt it will be a tragedy (not for the pensioners),but if the case had been allowed to be fought alone by him,it would have carried the risk of a  certain calamity for pensioners at large.If by God's Grace,we succeed at the Apex Court,Mr Asthana  also will be assured of the benefit even if he drops out.
It is true that I have nothing to do with his case, but the mails that I have been receiving from Mr H K Aggarwal forwarding  Mr Asthana's posts had to be responded to by me.But let me remind Mr Asthana that I have been   a  Life member of AIRIEF even before becoming a member of another Association.
C H Mahadevan

Hindi Calendar

PERIODICA REVISION OF PENSION

MR MAHADEVAN HAS PERHAPS FORGOTTEN THAT I HAVE BEEN FIGHTING THE CASE SINCE 1998 OF MY COURT AND AM ENGAGED IN THIS PROFESSION BESIDES THE JOURNEY HAD BEEN SUCCESSFUL. HE HAS ALSO FORGOTTEN THAT MY CASE WAS REFERRED TO DHC BY THE SUPREME COURT, THEN WHERE WAS THE NECESSITY OF HIS FEDERATION OR THE LEGAL COMMITTEE TO HAVE COME AND
INTERFERED IN THE SUCCESSFUL JOURNEY ON GROUNDS WHICH CANNOT GET SUCCESS TO HIM.THERE WAS NO LEGAL COMMITTEE EVER SINCE THE BEGINNING. IT HAS COME INTO FORMATION AT THE WILL OF ONE PERSON JUST TO SHIRK HIS RESPONSIBILITY ON OTHERS. THE RESULT IS APPARENT
I CAN AND AM INSISTING ON THE JUDGMENT OF JAIPUR HC WHICH HAS NOT SO FAR BEEN REVERSED BY ANY COURT, THEN WHY NEW UNTANABLE GROUNDS BE INVOKED KNOWING FULLY WELL THAT THEY HAVE NO SUBSTANCE IN OUR CASE.
THE CIRCUMSTANCES WHICH HAVE BEEN CREATED BY HIM AND HIS PREDECESSOR ARE COMPELLING ME TO REMAIN SILENT, BUT HE IS STILL NOT ABLE TO UNDERSTAND THE REPERCUSSIONS ON MY  WITHDRAWAL.
ANYWAY HE HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH MY CASE BEING AN OFFICE BEARER OF A RIVAL FEDERATION CREATED TO INTERVENE
KML ASTHANA

SC extends deadline for linking of Aadhaar to all services to March 31

aadhaar 
The Supreme Court today extended till March 31 next year the deadline for mandatory linking of Aadhaar with various services and welfare schemes.
A five-judge Constitution Bench headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra, in an interim order, also modified its earlier order with regard to linking of Aadhaar with mobile services and said the deadline of February 6 next year for this purpose also stood extended till March 31.
The bench, which also comprised Justices A K Sikri, A M Khanwilkar, D Y Chandrachud and Ashok Bhushan, said that for opening new bank accounts, an applicant will not be required to provide Aadhaar number to the bank.
However, the applicant will have to show the proof to the bank that he/she has applied for the Aadhaar number, Justice Chandrachud, who wrote the unanimous interim order, said.
The apex court said the Constitution Bench would commence final hearing from January 17 on the petition challenging the Aadhaar scheme itself.
Yesterday, Attorney General K K Venugopal had submitted before the top court that the deadline of mandatory linking of Aadhaar with various services and welfare schemes can also be extended upto March 31 next year.
Recently, a nine-judge constitution bench of the apex court had held that Right to Privacy was a Fundamental Right under the Constitution. Several petitioners challenging the validity of Aadhaar had claimed it violated privacy rights.
Some petitioners in the top court have termed the linking of the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) number with bank accounts and mobile numbers as "illegal and unconstitutional".
S

THOUGHT OF THE DAY FW ERI BOI FROM ZEE NEWS

·THOUGHT OF THE DAY 
Image may contain: text
Regards, E.R.Iyer

Thursday, 14 December 2017

PM addresses inaugural session of 90th Annual General Meeting of FICCI

PM addresses inaugural session of 90th Annual General Meeting of FICCI



The Prime Minister, Shri Narendra Modi, today addressed the inaugural session of the 90th Annual General Meeting of FICCI. 

He recalled that around the time of FICCI's founding in 1927, Indian Industry had united against the Simon Commission that was constituted by the then British Government. He said that Indian Industry had joined all other sections of Indian society, in national interest, at that time. 

The Prime Minister said that a similar atmosphere exists today when people of the country are coming forward to fulfill their responsibilities towards the nation. He said the hopes and aspirations of people are to rid the country from internal problems like corruption, and black money. He said political parties and chambers of industry should keep in mind the country's requirements and the feelings of the people, and work accordingly. 

The Prime Minister said that a lot has been achieved since independence, but several challenges have arisen as well. He said the poor seemed to be struggling against the system that came to be established, for things such as bank accounts, gas connections, scholarships, pensions etc. He said the Union Government is working to end this struggle, and to create a system that is transparent and sensitive. He said the Jan Dhan Yojana is one example of this, and increasing "ease of living" has been the focus of the Union Government. He also mentioned the Ujjwala Yojana, construction of toilets under the Swachh Bharat Mission, and Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana. He said that he has come through poverty, and understands the need to work for the requirements of the poor and the nation. He also mentioned the Mudra Yojana, for collateral-free loans to entrepreneurs. 

The Prime Minister said that the Union Government is working to strengthen the banking system. He said the issue of NPAs is a legacy received by the current Government. He said, rumours are now being spread about the Financial Regulation and Deposit Insurance (FRDI) Bill. He said the Government is working to protect the interests of the account holders, but rumours that are being spread are the exact opposite. He said organizations such as FICCI have a responsibility to generate awareness about such issues. He said, that similarly, FICCI has a role to play in making GST more effective. He said the Government's effort is to ensure that maximum businesses register for GST. He said the more formal the system becomes, the more it will benefit the poor. It will enable easier availability of credit from the banks, and reduce cost of logistics, thereby enhancing competitiveness of businesses. I hope FICCI has some plan to generate large-scale awareness among small traders, he added. He also said that FICCI must also voice concerns, when necessary, on issues such as builders exploiting the common man. 

The Prime Minister mentioned policy decisions taken in sectors such as urea, textile, civil aviation, and health, and the benefits achieved from them. He also mentioned reforms in sectors such as defence, construction, food-processing etc. He said that as a result of these measures, India's rank has risen from 142 to 100, in the World Bank "Ease of Doing Business" rankings. He also mentioned other indicators which point to the robust health of the economy. He said that the steps taken by the Government are also playing a key role in job creation. 

The Prime Minister said FICCI has a key role to play in sectors such as food processing, start-ups, artificial intelligence, solar power, healthcare etc. He urged FICCI to play the role of a think-tank for the MSME sector. 

***

Periodical revision of pension

Mr Asthana has been repeating the same old points again. If the Legal Committee did not agree with the suggestions of Mr Asthana,the Committee view should be accepted as one emerging out of collective wisdom.The Legal Committee is larger than an individual member of the Committee.There is no point in blaming the Committee or the AIRIEF for having taken decisions in the interest of the pensioners at large.
Mr Asthana's financial constraints are understandable but it is up to him to decide how to meet the situation in the present circumstances and explore the options for the same.
If he decides to withdraw from the legal fight at this juncture,it will indeed be unfortunate,but with five other SLPs before the Supreme Court,the case will go on.Personally I feel that there are better chances today of a successful finality in the Apex Court than if Mr Asthana would have carried on the fight alone as done earlier.Not that he would not have been able to win, but the risk of losing the legal battle has now been minimized with different pensioners' organizations in the legal fight for a common cause.
So I feel that there is no room for pessimism in the present situation.Let us look forward for good developments on 10th January 2018 in the Supreme Court.
Greetings.
C H Mahadevan

Senior Advocate Rajeev Dhavan Decides To Quit Court Practice


Senior Advocate Rajeev Dhavan has decided to give up court practice. In a letter to Chief Justice DIpak Misra he said;
"After the humiliating end to the Delhi case, I have decided to give up Court practice.
You are entitled to take back my Senior Gown conferred on me, though I would like to keep it for memory and services rendered".
Speaking to LiveLaw, he said, "I was humiliated . The whole court was laughing at me . This is my final decision. I have decided not to make appearance in any court".
What happened on the final day of hearing in Centre Vs Delhi Case
The five-Judge Constitution bench of the Supreme Court concluded its hearing in Delhi v  Centre and reserved its judgment on December 6.   The conclusion of the hearing a little after 4 p.m. was marred by heated exchanges between the Chief Justice of India, Dipak Misra, and the senior counsel for the Delhi Government, Rajeev Dhawan.
As Rajeev Dhawan wanted to make oral submissions, in response to the respondents' contentions, the Chief Justice, who was initially reluctant to hear him, permitted him to do so when he insisted, on the condition that he would avoid the points already canvassed by the lead counsel, Gopal Subramanium.
Dhawan then submitted that Article 239 has to be read as a whole, and not in isolation.  The Chief Justice objected to asking why he was making it an issue when nobody suggested it.  This is an uncalled for and unwanted argument, the CJI described Dhawan's submission.
Unhappy with Dhawan's continued submissions on the same point, the CJI said: "You go on shouting. You are always like that.  We will give our judgment".  This choice of words by the Chief Justice embarrassed Dhawan, who regretted that the Constitution bench was not permitting him to articulate his propositions.
The Chief Justice then asked both Gopal Subramanium and Indira Jaising to clarify.Both the counsel tried to explain the observations of the bench and the other counsel, which suggested that Dhavan might have got it wrong.
An unhappy Dhavan then said he would not mind losing the case, and referred to the Chief Justice's observation that the bench would give its judgment, whatever his propositions are.   The Chief Justice denied making such an observation.  Meanwhile, Indira Jaising told Dhavan that the other counsel for the petitioners are hopeful that they would win the case, and therefore, his remark was premature.  Gopal Subramanium added that he and Jaising had argued the case with a great deal of conviction.  
Concluding his submissions, Dhawan apologised to the bench, if he had misunderstood its interventions during the hearing.

THOUGHT OF THE DAY FW ERI BOI

THOUGHT OF THE DAY
Image may contain: sky, outdoor, nature, water and text
Regards, E.R.Iyer

Extension of deadline till 31.3.18 for submission of Aadhaar number, and Permanent Account Number or Form 60 by client to the reporting entity

Extension of deadline till 31.3.18 for submission of Aadhaar number, and Permanent Account Number or Form 60 by client to the reporting entity

After considering various representations received and inputs received from Banks, it has been decided to notify 31st March, 2018 or six months from the date of commencement of account based relationship by the client, whichever is later, as the date of submission of the Aadhaar number, and Permanent Account Number or Form 60 by the clients to the reporting entity. Necessary notification in this regard has been issued.

 

It may be recalled that earlier Under the provisions of Prevention of Money-laundering (Maintenance of Records) Second Amendment Rules, 2017, published in the Extraordinary Gazette of India vide G.S.R. 538 (E) dated 01.06.2017, it was provided that

 

i)                    In case the client, eligible to be enrolled for Aadhaar and obtain a Permanent Account Number does not submit the Aadhaar number or the Permanent Account Number at the time of commencement of an account based relationship with a reporting entity, the client shall submit the same within a period of six months from the date of the commencement of the account based relationship. Provided that the clients, eligible to be enrolled for Aadhaar and obtain the Permanent Account Number, already having an account based relationship with reporting entities prior to date of this notification, the client shall submit the Aadhaar number and Permanent Account Number by 31st December, 2017.

(ii)        In case the client fails to submit the Aadhaar number and Permanent Account Number within the aforesaid six months period, the said account shall cease to be operational till the time the Aadhaar number and Permanent Account Number is submitted by the client.  Provided that in case client already having an account based relationship with reporting entities prior to date of this notification fails to submit the Aadhaar number and Permanent Account Number by 31st December, 2017, the said account shall cease to be operational till the time the Aadhaar number and Permanent Account Number is submitted by the client.

 

 

*****

 

DSM/SBS/KA

 

Wednesday, 13 December 2017

Components of Valuation Surplus-The myth of adverse impact of pension upgradation

Dear Mr Sahni,
I happened to glance at the article of Mr R Ramakrishnan on Analysis of Valuation Surplus in the link published by you.
I found the following para very significant from the angle of relevance of  LIC’s financials affecting rewards to policyholders which came up in the Delhi HC in which LIC was able to have its way by harping on upgradation of pension eroding the valuation surplus to the detriment of policyholders.
Mr R Ramakrishnan writes:
“ Components of Valuation Surplus 
11) The main components of the valuation surplus are,  a) Premium income,  b) Marketing expenses (including agency commission),  c) Administrative expenses, d) Claims,  e) Investment income, f) Lapses and Paid-up, g) Revivals, h) Surrenders, i) Provision for Future Bonus and j) Impact of elimination of negative liability.”

Thus there are ten components of valuation surplus out of which three items have an income angle while the remaining 7 have an outgo impact.Out of the outgo components,administrative expenses are only one among the seven components constituting 20% of the total outgo.Again,the additional contribution to pension constitutes but about 30% of Salary Expenses which again forms only a part of administrative expenses excluding commission expenses.
It does not require actuarial acumen to conclude that the nine components excluding administrative expenses have more potential to impact the valuation surplus either on the positive side or negative side depending on the working of the Corporation in terms of new business growth, qualitative productivity of marketing personnel,quality of new business,effective investment of policyholders’ Fund including control on Non-Performing Assets,conservation of business,arresting surrenders and economy in operations in general.
Viewed from this perspective,the impact of additional liability of the Corporation on account of upgradation of pension to a potentially vanishing tribe of LIC Pensioners pales into insignificance.

In fact I had sent an article for publication in ‘Yogakshema ‘ magazine a month ago,but I have no information on its possible publication.I propose  to send the article fo the blogs after my return to Hyderabad on 20th inst.
My point in writing this is that we need not be defensive in the Supreme Court if the financial impact bogey is raised by LIC  again in the course of arguments,where our case is very strong on points of law.
Kind regards.
C H Mahadevan 


Cash Flow - Endorsement by Shri R Ramakrishnan

Analysis of Surplus by Shri R Ramakrishnan

THOUGHTS OF THE DAY FW ERIBOI

THOUGHTS OF THE DAY
 Regards, E.R.Iyer