PENSIONERS' VOICE AND SOUND TRACK APPEALS YOU "USE MASK""KEEP SOCIAL DISTANCE" "GHAR BATHO ZINDA RAHO" "STAY HOME SAVE LIVES"
DEAR FRIENDS, CONGRATS, YOUR BLOG CROSSED 3268000 HITS ON 01.02.2023 THE BLOG WAS LAUNCHED ON 23.11.2014,HAVE A GREAT DAY
VISIT 'PENSIONERS VOICE & SOUND TRACK' WAY TO CATCH UP ON PENSIONER RELATED NEWS!

Saturday 27 April 2024

Contradictions our Pension Rules,1995

Rule 35(2) of LIC Pension Rules 1995 reads as follows:
 " 35 (2) In the case of an employee retiring in accordance with the provisions of the Service Rules or of the Staff Regulations after completing a qualifying service of not less than thirty three years the amount of basic pension shall be calculated at fifty per cent. of the average emoluments."
The meaning is that this rule is applicable to all employees covered by the LIC Pension Rules 1995.
But Rule 55 B covers officers in the cadres of Chairman( now Chief Executive) and Managing Directors who are singled out for more liberal dispensation by making their pensionary benefits to be paid as per the CCS Pension Rules 1972( now repealed by CCS Pension Rules 2021)     and the Central Civil Services (Commutation of Pension) Rules, 1981, as applicable to Central Government servants and in accordance with the instructions issued by the Central Government there under from time to time.
Rule 31 of CCS Pension Rules 2021 reads as follows:
"31. Emoluments.- 
(1) emoluments
Fundamental Rules, 1922 which a Government servant was receiving immediately before his retirement or on the date 
of his death; and will also include non-practising allowance granted to a medical officer in lieu of private practice. 
Explanation.- Stagnation increment shall be treated as emoluments for calculation of retirement benefits"
Again Rule 44 of the CCS Pension Rules 2021 reads as follows:

"44. Amount of Pension.- (1) A Government servant, who retires under rule 33, rule 34, rule 35, rule 36, rule 37, 
rule 38 or rule 39, after completing a qualifying service of not less than ten years, shall become eligible for grant of a 
pension calculated at fifty per cent of emoluments or average emoluments, whichever is more beneficial to him, 
subject to a minimum of nine thousand rupees per month and maximum of one lakh twenty-five thousand rupees per 
month:
Provided that a Government servant who retires under rule 39 before completing a qualifying service of ten 
years but fulfils the conditions mentioned in sub-rule (9) of rule 39, shall also be eligible for an invalid pension 
calculated at fifty per cent of emoluments or average emoluments, whichever is more beneficial to him and the 
condition of completion of minimum qualifying service of ten years shall not be applicable for grant of pension in his 
case.....".
The implications of Rule 35(2)  and Rule 55 B  when considered side by side are that the top two cadre officers are provided more beneficial treatment in fixation of their pension on retirement at 50% of the emoluments or average emoluments whichever is more beneficial .
But in case of other cadres ,as we have experienced, pension is fixed at 50% of the average emoluments drawn during the last ten months of service before retirement.
Thus the there is a more liberal method for fixing basic pension for Chairman & Managing Director compared to other employees in the lower cadres whose basic pension is determined as per Rule 35(2).
The contradiction arises  because Rule 35(2) specifically does not exclude officers covered by Rule 55 B.Thus  the existence  of Rule 35(2) and Rule  55 Btogether in LIC Pension Rules 1995 violates Article 14  of the Constitution in my view.
I leave it to the legal experts  to consider whether my interpretation is correct. Our pensioner bodies have been repeatedly requesting LIC Management to consider amendment of Rule 35(2) as applicable to Central Government employees and RBI Pension Rules, but the Central Government has not given its approval. Now this matter has to be taken up as a part of our demand for making Rule 56 applicable in our legal fight.
C H Mahadevan

Friday 26 April 2024

SC Judgement dated 26.04.2024 in EVM

SC Judgement dated 26.04.2024 in EVM
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1DqiHgzgfonfRwBcNfig-w4A2DSIerQgY/view?usp=drivesdk



'Delhi Govt Only Interested In Appropriation Of Power': High Court On Failure To Supply Books In MCD Schools

'Delhi Govt Only Interested In Appropriation Of Power': High Court On Failure To Supply Books In MCD Schools

https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/delhi-high-court/delhi-high-court-pulls-delhi-govt-no-books-in-mcd-schools-256261


Rectification of Commutation Factor Fixation and Restoration of Commuted Portion of Pension – Request by BPS

Rectification of Commutation Factor Fixation and Restoration of Commuted Portion of Pension – Request by BPS

rectification-of-commutation-factor-fixation

BHARAT PENSIONERS SAMAJ
(All India Federation of Pensioners' Association)
2/13-A-LGF Backside Jangpura-'A', New Delhi – 110 014

No BPS/SG/commutation/024/03

Dated: 21.04.2024

To:

1. The Secretary (Pension)
Government of India
Department of Pension & Pensioners' Welfare

2.The Finance Secretary & Secretary (Expenditure)
GOI.MOF- Department of Expenditure'

Subject Request for Rectification of Commutation Factor Fixation and Restoration of Commuted Portion of Pension

Respected Sirs.

Bharat Pensioners Samaj is writing to highlight significant flaws in the fixation of Commutation Factors (CF) for Central Government Pensioners and to urge for the restoration of the commuted portion of pension after 12 years instead of the current 15 years.

The current Commutation Factor determination, as per the Central Civil Services (Commutation of Pension) Rules, 1981, lacks adequacy and fairness due to several outdated parameters and methodologies. Despite changes in interest rates, mortality rates, and life expectancy over the past decade, the existing rules have not been revised accordingly.

BPS emphasizes the following key concerns:

1. Outdated Parameters: The Commutation Tables are based on outdated data, specifically the LIC table 94-96. with an interest rate of 8% effective from 2/9/2008. This approach fails to reflect current economic realities and demographic trends.

2. Improper Recovery Period: The current recovery period of 15 years is unjustified, as the actual recovery period is less than 11 years. This results in excessive recovery from pensioners, causing financial strain.

3. Need for Periodic Revision: Commutation tables should be reconstructed every 5 years to align with changes in RBI repo rates, market interest rates, life expectancy, and mortality rates.

4. Discrepancies in CF Calculation: Discrepancies in CF calculation result in a reduction of the commuted amount by 16.5% for pensioners retiring after 2/8/2008, compared to those retired before.

5. Restoration of Commuted Portion: The current policy of restoring the commuted portion of pension after 15 years is inequitable. Recommendations for restoration after 12 years have been made by expert bodies like the Department of Pension and Pension Welfare, but have not been accepted by the Finance Ministry.

In light of these concerns, we urge for the following actions:

1. Reconstruction of Commutation tables effective from 2008 onwards, considering factors such as a recovery period of 12 years, mortality rates by the Institute of Actuaries of India, life expectancy by the Census department, and interest rates based on GPF rates or RBI repo rate.

2. Restoration of the commuted portion of pension after 12 years instead of the current 15 years. in line with recommendations made by expert bodies.

BPS believes that these reforms are essential to ensure fairness and adequacy in pension provisions for retired government employees, who have dedicated their lives to public service.

Your attention to this matter is earnestly requested, and we hope for a favorable resolution.

Thank you for your consideration.

Yours faithfully,

(S.C.Maheshwari)
Secy.Genl
Bharat Pensioners Samaj

NOIP meets Joint Secretary, DFS

Dear Shri. Sahni ji,
Please find the attachment and request for the kind publication in your esteemed blog and oblige.
Ashok J.Joshi,
GS, NOIP (BMS)
PS :: Two Attachments are posted below
R K SAHNI 

Pending pension related issues of LIC pensioners

Regn No.PN 4769 (Regd under Indian T U Act, 1926)

(Affiliated to Bharateeya Mazdoor Sangh)

BMS Office, Vishwakarma Bhavan, 185, Shaniwar Peth, Pune 411030.

President: T.C. Gunesh Kumar Mob No: 9880683639

General Secretary: Ashok J. Joshi Mob No: 9561084182 & 9945104570

Date: 23-04-2024

The Secretary (DFS), Dept of Finance, GOI, Jeevan Deep Building, Parliament Street, NEW DELHI

Dear Sir,

Sub: Pending pension related issues of LIC pensioners

This is further to our letters dtd 28-01-2024 & 12-02-2024 regarding the captioned matter. The pending issues are reiterated here below in a nutshell.

We appeal to you to bestow your kind attention to resolve the same since they are pending approval for a long time.

  • 1)
    Updation of pension with every wage revision- OROP
  • 2)
    One more pension option to the left-over ex-servicemen and directly recruited superintending/Executive engineers (whose number is less than 100 in total). When Modiji has done a lot of good things to the Ex-Servicemen including grant of OROP, why a handful of ex-servicemen in LIC are denied the pension option, is not understandable.
  • 3)
    Increased pension to 80+ seniors.
  • 4)
    Double the family pension up to age 67 in case pensioner dies before age 67.
  • 5)
    Computation of pension at 50% of last pay drawn or 50% of last 10 months' average pay, whichever is favourable to the retiree.
  • 6)
    Full pension for service of 20 years or more.
  • 7)
    One more pension option to those PF optees, who have resigned and had put in more than 20 years of service. (Resigned due to domestic/health issues, mostly ladies)­Recently given to Bank retirees by IBA through bilateral agreement with UFBU.
  • 8)
    100% DR neutralization for pre 8/1997 retirees- Recently given to Bank retirees by IBA through bilateral agreement with UFBU for those retirees retired prior to 11/2002.

With thanks and regards,

Yours Sincerely,

General Secretary

Meeting with Joint Secretary, DFS

Regn No.PN 4769 (Regd under Indian T U Act, 1926)

(Affiliated to Bharateeya Mazdoor Sangh)

BMS Office, Vishwakarma Bhavan, 185, Shaniwar Peth, Pune 411030.

President: T.C. Gunesh Kumar Mob No: 9880683639

General Secretary: Ashok J. Joshi Mob No: 9561084182 & 9945104570

Date: 26-04-2024

Cir No 8/2024

Re: Meeting with Joint Secretary, DFS.

The undersigned was on 3 days' visit to Delhi from 23rd to 25th April 2024. It was planned to visit DFS on either of the 3 days. On 24th , grand AGM of Delhi was held with packed attendance. With a skillful maneuvering by our Delhi activists, we were able to meet Dr. Prashant Goel, Joint Secretary (Insc), DFS on 25-04-2024 at 2-45 pm and the meeting lasted for 15 minutes. The delegation was led by the undersigned accompanied by S/Shri. Arvind Mittimani, Org Secr, Rajiv Sharma, CC member and Subhash Raina, Secretary Delhi unit. We submitted our letter dtd 23-4-2024 addressed to the Secretary, DFS, which is appended herewith. Pointwise reporting is as follows-

  • 1)
    Updation- We pointed out the dire need of updation saying, IBA at last, principally accepted the need for updation and granted interim relief. He quipped to say that where the pension updation has taken place in financial sector except, RBI? He did not deny the need for updation but indicated that it should start with banks.
  • 2)
    OMOP- left over cases- We brought home the fact that ex-servicemen did not opt initially because there was a provision for only one Family pension, which was changed in 2013. Directly recruited engineers did not opt due to their ignorance. Hence, requested to offer all of these persons OMOP, whose number is less than 100. Moreover, LIC has already recommended. He gave a patient hearing and appeared to be convinced.
  • 3)
    Increased pension to 80+- He did not offer any comments, though LIC is said to have recommended.
  • 4)
    Double the FP up to age 67- We requested for approval since it is recommended by LIC.
  • 5)
    50% of last pay as pension- We explained the anomaly and to adopt the central govt rule in this regard. He was non-committal.
  • 6)
    Full pension for 20 years' service- We explained the cases of ex-servicemen, SC, ST, OBC and DO recruits at higher age etc and requested for acceding to our request, quoting RBI notification way back in 2013. He did not offer any comments.
  • 7)
    OMOP to resignees- We quoted recent agreement in banks and requested to offer OMOP to such resignees in LIC, too. When we said such cases are in hundreds and mostly ladies who resigned due to domestic problems, he appeared to be inclined to consider in view of a few such cases.
  • 8)
    100% DR to pre 8/97 retirees- We again quoted the recent agreement in banks and further said that the Delhi HC gave the truncated %, lesser than 100% neutralization in our case. He was not averse to our request.

Regarding wage revision notification, he said that DFS is waiting for NOC from the Election Commission and soon therafter it would be notified. We referred to the LIC's press statement saying more than 30000 pensioners would get the one time compensation, he asked what is the number. We said around 70000. On our pointed query he asked to wait for the details of notification but told that it would be on bank pattern.

He was very cordial and receptive and appeared to be considerate. We also told him that all the issues have been discussed by us in detail with Shri. Saurabh Mishra, earlier JS in which meeting Shri. Vinod Kumar, Under Secretary was present. He assured to look into.

NOIP will continue to follow up the issues till their logical conclusion.

With regards, Encl: As above

General Secretary

BREAKING | Supreme Court Rejects Plea For 100% EVM-VVPAT Verification, Issues Directions To Seal Symbol Loading Unit

BREAKING | Supreme Court Rejects Plea For 100% EVM-VVPAT Verification, Issues Directions To Seal Symbol Loading Unit

https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/-supreme-court-rejects-pleas-seeking-100-evm-vvpat-cross-verification-issues-directions-to-seal-symbol-loading-unit-256174


Supreme Court Judgment On EVM-VVPAT Verification : Live Updates

Supreme Court Judgment On EVM-VVPAT Verification : Live Updates

https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/supreme-court-judgment-on-evm-vvpat-verification-live-updates-256161


Thursday 25 April 2024

*2014 का आईपीएल भारत में नहीं दुबई में हुआ था*

यदि आपको भूलने की बीमारी नहीं हैं तो आपको यह अवश्य याद होगा कि *2014 का आईपीएल भारत में नहीं दुबई में हुआ था* और वजह थी कि चुनाव होने के कारण, भारत सरकार ने सुरक्षा के लिए मना कर दिया था कहा था कि हालात ऐसे है कि देश में चुनाव हो रहे हैं और हम आईपीएल मैचो के दौरान सुरक्षा नहीं दे सकते हैं ।

अब दिमाग से सोचो कि कैसी सरकार रही होगी जो अपने ही देश के लिए हो रहे आयोजन के लिए वह सुरक्षा नहीं दे सकते थे !  मजबूरी में इस टूर्नामेंट को दक्षिण अफ्रीका में करना पड़ा था ।
उसे समय देश की स्थिति ऐसी थी कि किसी न किसी राज्य में बम धमाके होते रहते थे ।

*आज आप देख लीजिए वही भारत की सेना है, वही राज्यों की पुलिस है और वही भारत के नागरिक है,बदली हैं तो सिर्फ सरकार। । कहीं कोई बम धमाका नहीं । आईपीएल भी बड़े धूमधाम से चल रहा है और साथ में चुनाव भी बड़े आराम से हो रहे हैं*

इसलिए चुनाव के समय यह मत देखना की उम्मीदवार किसकी जाति का है उम्मीदवार आपकी जाति का है या नहीं ये सोचकर मत देना, क्योंकि यह चुनाव कोई नगर पालिका वार्ड पंच सरपंच और विधायक का नहीं है,
यह देश का चुनाव है ।

ध्यान रहे जब देश में अराजकता होती है, आतंकवादी बम धमाके करते हैं तो आपकी जाति का उम्मीदवार उस जगह आपकी मदद करने को नहीं आएगा। क्या करेगा आपकी जाति का उम्मीदवार ?

*इसलिए इस जातिवाद के बंधन से बाहर निकलकर राष्ट्रहित के लिए मतदान करिए।*

वंदे मातरम 
भारत माता की जय
*भारत में जब चुनाव के नतीजे आए तो पटाखे भारत के लोगों द्वारा फोङे जाने चाहिए पाकिस्तानियों द्वारा नहीं*🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳

TODAY NOIP DELEGATION MET JT SECT DFS





FOR FLASH REPORT SEE PREVIOUS POST
R K SAHNI 

FLASH FLASH FLASH






Latest on our case in SC today

Today also the judges Of the Court Room no 6 , where our case was posted, were on the Constitution Bench for the whole day. As such our case could not be heard. It is our  bad luck. Let us wait for the next Wednesday/Thursday. 

S. K. Awasthi.

Do Private Properties Come Under 'Material Resources Of Community' To Be Distributed For Common Good? Supreme Court Starts Hearing On Article 39(b)

Do Private Properties Come Under 'Material Resources Of Community' To Be Distributed For Common Good? Supreme Court Starts Hearing On Article 39(b) 

Listing of our cases on 25/04/2024

Our cases are listed for 25th Apr 2024 in the same manner as were listed on 24th. Also the sitting of bench in court 6 is subject to continuity of the constitutional Bench on 25th Apr 2024. So again there are less chances for hearing of our cases. However, if the Constitutional Bench completes the job early, bench in court n0. 6 may start proceedings. If the bench does not sit tomorrow there is possibility of our cases being kept on board for next Wednesday. Extract from SC website is given below:

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED: 25-04-2024

COURT NO. : 6

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA

(Time:10:30 AM)

Note:-

ALTERNATIVE BENCH

.

IF THE CONSTITUTION BENCH DOES NOT SIT FOR ANY REASON OR THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE THE CONSTITUTION BENCH IN CHIEF JUSTICE COURT ARE OVER, THE FOLLOWING MATTERS WILL BE TAKEN UP BY THIS BENCH

Service Matters - Retiral benefits

111

C.A. No. 3465/2024
XIV-A

ALL INDIA INSURANCE PENSIONERS ASSOCIATION THR. ITS PRESIDENT AND ORS. Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

M. RAMBABU AND CO.
RAJ BAHADUR YADAV[R-1],ASHOK PANIGRAHI[R-2],[R-3]

IA No. 17950/2020 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES

CONNECTED
111.1

C.A. No. 3467/2024
XIV-A

FEDERATION OF RETD. LIC CLASS I OFFICERS ASSOCIATION AND ORS. Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

T. L. GARG
RAJ BAHADUR YADAV[R-1],ASHOK PANIGRAHI[R-2],[R-3]

FOR APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION ON IA 90990/2022

IA No. 90990/2022 - APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION

CONNECTED
111.2

C.A. No. 3813/2024
XV

LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA AND ANR. Versus KRISHNA MURARI LAL ASTHANA (DEAD) THR. LRS.

ASHOK PANIGRAHI
TOM JOSEPH[R-1.2],[R-1.3]

FOR RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER ON IA 29762/2022 FOR APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS ON IA 101480/2022 FOR PERMISSION TO APPEAR AND ARGUE IN PERSON ON IA 106715/2022

IA No. 101480/2022 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS

IA No. 106715/2022 - PERMISSION TO APPEAR AND ARGUE IN PERSON

IA No. 29762/2022 - RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER

CONNECTED
111.3

C.A. No. 3466/2024
XIV-A

ALL INDIA RETIRED INSURANCE EMPLOYEES FEDERATION Versus LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA AND ANR.

RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL
ASHOK PANIGRAHI[R-1],RAJ BAHADUR YADAV[R-2]

FOR CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION ON IA 141188/2017 FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA 54179/2022

IA No. 141188/2017 - CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION

IA No. 54179/2022 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES

CONNECTED
111.4

C.A. No. 3468/2024
XIV-A

RETIRED LIC CLASS I OFFICERS ASSOCIATION Versus LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA

ASHISH KUMAR TIWARI [P-1]
ASHOK PANIGRAHI[R-1],RAJ BAHADUR YADAV[R-2]

CONNECTED
111.5

C.A. No. 3469/2024
XIV-A

KRISHNA MURARI LAL ASTHANA Versus LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA AND ORS.

PETITIONER-IN-PERSON[P-1]
ASHOK PANIGRAHI[R-1],RAJ BAHADUR YADAV[R-2]

IA No. 144252/2018 - APPLICATION FOR TAGGING/DETAGGING

IA No. 139468/2022 - APPLICATION FOR TAGGING/DETAGGING

IA No. 115900/2019 - EARLY HEARING APPLICATION

IA No. 63896/2018 - PERMISSION TO APPEAR AND ARGUE IN PERSON

IA No. 159527/2019 - PERMISSION TO PLACE ON RECORD SUBSEQUENT FACTS

CONNECTED
111.6

C.A. No. 3470/2024
XIV-A

MADAN LAL GANDHI AND ORS. Versus UNION OF INDIA SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE DEPT. OF ECONOMIC AFFAIRS AND ORS.

ANURAG[P-3],[P-4],[P-5],[P-6],[P-7],[P-8],[P-9],[P-10],[P-11],[P-12],[P-13],[P-15],[P-16],[P-17],[P-18],[P-19],[P-20],[P-21],[P-22],[P-23]
RAJ BAHADUR YADAV[R-1],ASHOK PANIGRAHI[R-2],[R-3],[R-4]

IA No. 22613/2019 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING REPLY AFFIDAVIT





VVPT Case: ECI ANSWERS QUERIES

VVPT Case: ECI ANSWERS QUERIES

Wednesday 24 April 2024

Our case in SC Court No. 6 are on board tomorrow also

Dear All,
Our case is on Board tomorrow also at the same Serial No. 111 provided the Constitution Bench does not sit or the case is over.
With regards,
R K SAHNI 

OUR CASE IN SC ON 24.04.2024

We are given to understand that normally Regular Appeals are heard on Wednesday and Thursday. 
Further our case is on Board and  therefore the cases listed before the bench will be taken up serial wise. So we don't have to worry about the next date. 
The possibilities are that our case may come up before the Summer Vacations of the Supreme Court. 

S. K. Awasthi

Plea For 100% EVM-VVPAT Verification : Supreme Court Seeks Clarifications From ECI | LIVE UPDATES


Plea For 100% EVM-VVPAT Verification : Supreme Court Seeks Clarifications From ECI | LIVE UPDATES
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/supreme-court-direction-on-100-evm-vvpat-verification-live-updates-255942


Plea For 100% EVM-VVPAT Verification : Supreme Court Seeks Clarifications From ECI | LIVE UPDATES


Plea For 100% EVM-VVPAT Verification : Supreme Court Seeks Clarifications From ECI | LIVE UPDATES
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/supreme-court-direction-on-100-evm-vvpat-verification-live-updates-255942


Petitions Seeking 100% EVM-VVPAT Verification Listed Tomorrow In Supreme Court For Directions

Petitions Seeking 100% EVM-VVPAT Verification Listed Tomorrow In Supreme Court For Directions

https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/petitions-seeking-100-evm-vvpat-verification-listed-tomorrow-in-supreme-court-for-directions-255934


Message from Shri Ashok Joshi

Today I was connected to Aryaji on phone through Shri. Rajiv Sharma ji of Delhi. Aryaji informed that wage notification has been referred to ECI on Friday for NOC.
Tomorrow I will be going to Delhi for 3 days. Hectic efforts are on to meet DFS through Aryaji. Our Delhi OBs have met Arya ji thrice in the last 15 days. 
Ashok Joshi
22-4-2024

Tuesday 23 April 2024

*Vote 🗳 and spread the importance of voting.*💐💐

Don't know who has made it but really good 

*A* ll the
*B* eloved 
*C* itizens come and do your
*D* uty to
*E* nsure that your
*F* uture is in 
*G* enuine and resposible
*H* ands which is so
*I* mportant.
*J* ust
*K* eep your 
*L* ong leave plans aside and
*M* ake sure you will
*N* ot miss the
*O* pportunity of
*P* ressing the button
*Q* uietly thereby discharging your
*R* esponsibility. Also
*S* pread the message
*T* o the
*U* naware
*V* oters as to not
*W* aste their
*X* tremely important vote & do 
*Y* our bit in building the future of this
*Z* ealous nation

*Vote 🗳 and spread the importance of voting.*💐💐 

Our cases in SC

Shri Sahni ji,
As informed by Shri Saxena ji, chances of our cases coming up tomorrow are feeble. So, I have not gone to Delhi. However, our advocates are prepared to start arguments, if the hearing takes place and if felt necessary they would request for keeping the cases on board in stead of giving next date. Let us see what happens tomorrow.
Regards,
M P Agnihotri 

Revision of rates of Allowances with DA rates increased to 50%.






Our cases listed at Serial Number 111 in SC Court No. 6 are unlikely to come up for hearing

COURT NO. : 6
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA
NOTE:-
ALTERNATIVE BENCH
.
THE CONSTITUTION BENCH PRESIDED OVER BY HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE IN CHIEF JUSTICE COURT ON 23.04.2024 (TUESDAY) IS LIKELY TO CONTINUE ON 24.04.2024 (WEDNESDAY)

IF THE CONSTITUTION BENCH DOES NOT SIT FOR ANY REASON OR THE MATTER LISTED BEFORE THE CONSTITUTION BENCH IN CHIEF JUSTICE COURT IS OVER, THE FOLLOWING MATTERS WILL BE TAKEN UP BY THIS BENCH
(TIME : 10:30)
Service Matters - Retiral benefits
111
C.A. No. 3465/2024
XIV-A
ALL INDIA INSURANCE PENSIONERS ASSOCIATION THR. ITS PRESIDENT AND ORS.VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
IA No. 17950/2020 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES
M. RAMBABU AND CO.
RAJ BAHADUR YADAV[R-1], ASHOK PANIGRAHI[R-2], [R-3]
 
 111.1
Connected
C.A. No. 3467/2024
XIV-A
FEDERATION OF RETD. LIC CLASS I OFFICERS ASSOCIATION AND ORS.VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.FOR APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION ON IA 90990/2022
IA No. 90990/2022 - APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION
T. L. GARG
RAJ BAHADUR YADAV[R-1], ASHOK PANIGRAHI[R-2], [R-3]
 .