DEAR FRIENDS,
THIS
IS TO INFORM YOU OF THE MOCKERY AND DISRESPECT PLAYED BY LIC AND
DISRESPECT AND MEAN ATTITUDE TOWARDS THE PENSIONERS. SHRI MC JAIN
RETIRED AS RM ON 31/3/1993 BUT HIS PAY WAS NOT REVISED AND SO THE
PENSION. HE THEREFORE FILED WRIT PETITION THAT HIS PAY BE FIXED IN THE
NEW PAY SCALE ON 1/8/1992 AND THEN HIS PENSION BE REVISED.
LIC HAS LOST THE CASE BEFORE THE SINGLE JUDGE, THEN THEIR APPEAL WAS DISMISSED BY THE DIVISION BY LONG JUDGMENT AT THE ADMISSION STAGE ITSELF WITHOUT ISSUE OF NOTICE AND THEIR SLP HAS ALSO BEEN DISMISSED.
IN THE WRIT PETITION FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE JUDGMENT NOTICES WERE DIRECTED TO BE ISSUED ON MONDAY THE 16TH AND THE SAME WERE SERVED TODAY. TODAY(19th Feb. 2015) MR JAIN RECEIVED A LETTER THAT TOWARDS ARREARS OF DIFFERENCE OF PENSION FROM NOVEMBER 1993 TO FEBRUARY 2014 THEY HAVE DEPOSITED AN AMOUNT OF RS. 12500 OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT.
NO CALCULATION SHEET HAD BEEN PROVIDED TO HIM. HE WAS DRAWING PENSION ON THE MAXIMUM OF ZM'S SCALE LESS THAN 3000 AND AFTER REVISION HIS BASIC PENSION WAS TO BE MORE THAN 5500/-.
THEREFORE IT IS MOCKERY. IN CASE THIS AMOUNT OF RS 12500 WAS PAYABLE THEN WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SPENDING LAKHS OF RUPEES ON THE LITIGATION.
IT COULD HAVE GRACEFULLY DONE THAT. BUT THEY ARE MORE INTERESTED IN HARASSING THE SENIOR CITIZEN PENSIONERS.
LIC HAS LOST THE CASE BEFORE THE SINGLE JUDGE, THEN THEIR APPEAL WAS DISMISSED BY THE DIVISION BY LONG JUDGMENT AT THE ADMISSION STAGE ITSELF WITHOUT ISSUE OF NOTICE AND THEIR SLP HAS ALSO BEEN DISMISSED.
IN THE WRIT PETITION FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE JUDGMENT NOTICES WERE DIRECTED TO BE ISSUED ON MONDAY THE 16TH AND THE SAME WERE SERVED TODAY. TODAY(19th Feb. 2015) MR JAIN RECEIVED A LETTER THAT TOWARDS ARREARS OF DIFFERENCE OF PENSION FROM NOVEMBER 1993 TO FEBRUARY 2014 THEY HAVE DEPOSITED AN AMOUNT OF RS. 12500 OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT.
NO CALCULATION SHEET HAD BEEN PROVIDED TO HIM. HE WAS DRAWING PENSION ON THE MAXIMUM OF ZM'S SCALE LESS THAN 3000 AND AFTER REVISION HIS BASIC PENSION WAS TO BE MORE THAN 5500/-.
THEREFORE IT IS MOCKERY. IN CASE THIS AMOUNT OF RS 12500 WAS PAYABLE THEN WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SPENDING LAKHS OF RUPEES ON THE LITIGATION.
IT COULD HAVE GRACEFULLY DONE THAT. BUT THEY ARE MORE INTERESTED IN HARASSING THE SENIOR CITIZEN PENSIONERS.
KML ASTHANA
(mail received at 00.53 hrs today ie 20.02.2015)
(mail received at 00.53 hrs today ie 20.02.2015)
