PENSIONERS' VOICE AND SOUND TRACK APPEALS YOU "USE MASK""KEEP SOCIAL DISTANCE" "GHAR BATHO ZINDA RAHO" "STAY HOME SAVE LIVES"
DEAR FRIENDS, CONGRATS, YOUR BLOG CROSSED 3268000 HITS ON 01.02.2023 THE BLOG WAS LAUNCHED ON 23.11.2014,HAVE A GREAT DAY
VISIT 'PENSIONERS VOICE & SOUND TRACK' WAY TO CATCH UP ON PENSIONER RELATED NEWS!

Saturday 5 September 2015

Re: 20% PAYMENT MADE IN JAIPUR?

Ironically it has emerged that LIC has been more gracious than it has so far intended to be while remitting amount in Jaipur High Court Registry.

In respect of Mr A P Tiwary who is one of the petitioners in Jaipur,LIC had totally paid Rs 14984/-as arrears upto 31st Oct 2013.
On a query by Mr R K Sahni who had calculated that only Rs 504/- was payable  to Mr Tiwary as per  the(faulty )method adopted by LIC,I happened to work out independently and the arrears as per my calculation worked out to Rs 505/-, almost the same as worked out by Mr Sahni.
This is a singular instance of LIC's graciousness-not conscious though. So if Mr Tiwary has got Rs 2997/- plus another amount to the extent of 20% of revised Basic Pension & DR for 18 months  from November 2013 to April 2015,then there will be an excess payment made to  Mr Tiwary.I am sure LIC Auditors will raise a query with a special report!
Of course,I am happy about the excess payment if it has been  made to Me Tiwary by way of interim relief!
Whether we had success  so far or not, we can definitely celebrate the excess!
Greetings.
C H Mahadevan 


On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 6:59 PM, Sreenivasa Murty Mulukutla <sreenivasa.murty@gmail.com> wrote:
It is learnt that 20% payment has been MADE to the pre-97 retiree petitioners of Jaipur. By direct credit to their respective Bank Accounts. If this news is confirmed, the theory that the withdrawal has nothing to do with payment stands disproved.

This was expected of LIC to be able to make some bold postures in SC on 7th. 

One has to now wait and see whether this will be happily acquiesced by the Jaipur Petitioners (just by looking the other way) or make any attempt to inform the SC that the payment thrust on some of the Petitioners, is totally unrelated to what is due under the Jaipur Judgement. 

IA No 6/2015 filed on behalf of Chandigarh Petitioners, will be vehemently pursued to its logical conclusion, ignoring the biased predictions of some small-minded onlookers. It was said 'any thing may happen'. Yes, any thing may happen. 

Pensioners may gain big or they have nothing to lose.    


Thanks and regards,
Sreenivasa Murty Mulukutla
106, Hill County
Nizampet Road, Bachupally
HYDERABAD 500090
+919177737356