Dear Shri Sridharan
I am obliged to have your views on
the subject.
Perhaps you know we were only 2 petitioners
of this category in gratuity case in Chandigarh High Court. Even after SC judgment
in 2008 LIC paid balance gratuity to post 4 /93 retd officers and denied
to our category of about 150.
Our petition was pending we
pursued it and got favourable judgment in July 2008. LIC waited for
complete 90 days and then honoured it for all in Oct 2008.
I know that yourself have been pursuing
it forcefully Shri S K Kapahi did inform
me of positive response.
My friends in this area who are
associated with AIIPA and AIRIEF were satisfied when I told them
that you have finalised for court action & they were happy.
I have not decided what I can do at
present. Only recently I learnt DR and updation anomaly case
in the banks was presented by retd Zonal Manager, Bank of Baroda to Chief Justice
by a letter and it stands admitted as a Grievance/petition. I thought why we
should not make a prayer in that fashion or if I can get financial support
from many we think of going to court.
Sh R K Jjindal your member has
got a list of 105 such persons but no data.
I also thought that retirees of 4/ 93
to 12 /93 are also losing to some extent more than retirees upto 8 /93 therefore I
thought of collecting their data also.
I have no tangible plan as yet. I seek
you advice.
Regard
S R Arora
No comments:
Post a Comment