AIBRF just now put its circular in its site Pl see attachment.
From this one can know how the AFFECTED RETIREES AGITATE THROUGH OUT LENGTH AND BREADTH OF COUNTRY and knock the door of AIBRF on whom all the blame came FOR IMMEDIATE REMEDIAL MEASURE
ALL INDIA BANK RETIREES' FEDERATION (Regd.)
Ref:2018/047 Date : 23.05.2018
Dear Comrades,
Re: Demand for convening urgent central committee Meeting to discuss Supreme Court Judgement
We are getting mails/ what Sapp messages from some central committee members/ individuals demanding that urgent meeting of central committee should be convened to discuss adverse judgement pronounced by the Supreme Court on 16.05.2018. 2. We appreciate their anxiety in the matter expressing need to convene meeting of the central committee.
................................4. As you know the Supreme Court Judgement has several inconsistencies, contradictions and lack of appreciation of the facts brought out through written submissions and documents. But at the same time as per law of the country, it is hard fact that judgements delivered by highest of the country may not be legally perfect but definitely final.
5. We wish to draw your attention on the above referred circular wherein we requested you send your specific views/ suggestion on the judgement which can be of help to the core committee in taking decision on the Review Petition. We have yet to receive any specific suggestion from any Office Bearers/ Central Commitee Members on the judgement except airing general views and need to call for urgent central committee meeting.
at the same time we are happy to note that Andhra Pradesh State Committee VIJAYAWADA LED BY COM.VENKATARATNAM GENERAL SECRETRY, (sri Katari Satyanarayana was also invited and participated)has held 2/3 brain storming sessions on the judgement with analysis of each Para and have drawn our attention on very vital inconsistencies noticed by them and are also in the process of sending detailed report for the use of core committee which can be of great help in taking the correct and effective decision. We really appreciate their efforts. We feel this is correct and constructive approach in handling such adverse situation rather than demanding urgent central committee meeting based on general perception possibly to fix accountability as early as possible for the failure.
Main Respondent in Kolkata case was United Bank Retired Employees Association who filed written submission duly prepared and vetted by the lawyer of this organisation. AIBRF only filed the IA to draw attention of the bench on additional facts through documents which were not on the record.
(g) It may mentioned that Review Petitions are examined and processed in Judges Camber by the same bench without oral arguments by the advocates. Rejection ratio of Review Petition is more than 99 per cent. Therefore one should not keep high hope from this exercise.
( S.C.JAIN) GENERAL SECRETARY
Meanwhile, CBPRO WHICH ALSO BOASTED OF STEERING THE CASE THROUGH ITS AFFILIATE CANARA BANK RETIREES ASSN. SAYS AS FOLLOWS EXPRESSING SYMPATHY AND SHOCK :
We had lot of confidence to WIN this case after witnessing the final arguments by our advocates, but our hopes are dashed. We understand the pain of the members who are deprived of their well deserved entitlements. We whole heartedly empathise and sympathise with the aggrieved members. While assuring the members of our best efforts to explore other alternatives, we note to issue a detailed circular after studying and analysing the full judgement of the Hon'ble Supreme Court. We once again express our sincere concern and deep shock in the matter.
Yours Comradely, A.Ramesh Babu K.V.Acharya Joint Conveners
=======================================================================================
Since 17th May many are crying to fix accountability for failure of the case and deprecate with hot languages. FEW SUGGESTIONS COMING TO COMPLAINT TO CHIEF JUSTICE ON THE JUDGE DELIVERED THE JUDGEMENT THAT HE OMITTED MANY POINTS TO BE TAKEN IN TO ACCOUNT IN THE JUDGEMNET. SOME SUGGESTING TO REFER IT TO CONSTITUTIONAL BENCH FOR REMEDY IN LIGHT OF 1616 1684 JUDGEMENT AS REGARDING BOTH CASES THE POINTS AND ASPECTS ARE SAME.
=VBV Ramesh
No comments:
Post a Comment