In our said affidavit we may also mention that 40% relief paid earlier has also been adjusted against DHC order. We may also quote the relevant paras from DHC order in our support of payment from the year 1998, DA @ 29% and non recovery of the interim relief paid earlier, as L I C has done in support of the payment made in their reply, and leave the matter there and concentrate on the main issue of upgradation and impress upon the Hon'ble Court to take up and decide that issue first as the final decision will automatically take care of all this payment. We should not entangle ourselves in this smaller issue and fall into the trap of LIC.The requirement given by our Advocate is very voluminous and its collection is very time consuming.In my opinion, we can give an affidavit that LIC has made payment from the year 2007 instead of 1997 and DR has been calculated @ 23% instead of 29 % as against the order of DHC. This fact we simply want to bring on record of the Court for future and we have not to contest this point at this stage, because our present fight is for upgradation of pension. In any case this interim relief is ultimately subject to Supreme Court final judgement.
S. R. Agarwal
No comments:
Post a Comment