Did Ambedkar gave advice for exchange of populations at the time of partition? AI mode: Yes, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar strongly advocated for a complete exchange of populations between India and Pakistan during the Partition period to ensure communal peace and national homogeneity. His detailed views on this subject were published in his 1940 book, Thoughts on Pakistan (later revised as Pakistan or the Partition of India). Key Arguments for Population Exchange Ambedkar’s advice was based on several strategic and social observations: Ensuring Homogeneity: He argued that Partition alone would not solve the "communal problem" unless the new states were religiously homogeneous. He believed that as long as large minorities remained, the same disharmony and "majority vs. minority" struggles would persist. Historical Precedents: He cited the Greco-Turkish population exchange of the 1920s as a successful model for organizing such a transfer to avoid perpetual civil conflict. Refocusing on Social Reform: Ambedkar believed that the presence of a large, politically assertive Muslim minority distracted Hindu leadership from addressing internal social evils like caste hierarchy and untouchability. He argued that a "Muslim-free India" would allow the nation to focus entirely on radical social and land reforms. Military Loyalty: He expressed concerns about the reliability of a religiously mixed army in a divided subcontinent, suggesting that homogeneous populations would ensure undisputed military allegiance to the respective states. (Even now one is constrained to support and implement this advice on seeing Bangladesh which could not be formed with help from India is transforming into a fundamental Muslim Nation to annihilate the progress of India perhaps with hidden help from China and Western Nations of Abrahamic religion. INDI ALLIANCE and particularly mentors of retirees and In-Service are appeasing Muslims from the day of partition till this day for vote bank politics. It is a great detriment Indian working class.)
Why Ambedkar Supported Partition: Remarks on His “Pakistan or the Partition of India”: Samidh Sadhu: This problem can only be solved if Pakistan be made a homogeneous state, devoid of any minority Hindu population. This can be done by (i) changing the borders and (ii) exchange of population. Though India cannot be made homogenous, the depreciation of Muslims would certainly put Hindus to a more advantageous state than they are now. The question is whether the two communities of Punjab and Bengal will agree to redraw boundaries. The Muslims should, if they want a more homogenous state. If they do not, it will mean that they want to tyrannise as many Hindus as possible. Many of the Hindus are unwilling to divide their provinces due to their selfishness – they are reluctant to relinquish their field of job. But, considering the larger menace of Muslim oppression, they should agree to the solution. (Ultimately Bengal and Punjab were divided but Hindus are tyrannised by Pakistan and Bangladesh for the last 78+ years due to first member of dynastic regime overthrowing the advice of DR BR Ambedkar. Now Indi Alliance is blaming NDA regime tyrannise minorities for the past 11 years to keep their vote bank secure.)
2 comments:
Did Ambedkar gave advice for exchange of populations at the time of partition? AI mode:
Yes, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar strongly advocated for a complete exchange of populations between India and Pakistan during the Partition period to ensure communal peace and national homogeneity.
His detailed views on this subject were published in his 1940 book, Thoughts on Pakistan (later revised as Pakistan or the Partition of India).
Key Arguments for Population Exchange
Ambedkar’s advice was based on several strategic and social observations:
Ensuring Homogeneity: He argued that Partition alone would not solve the "communal problem" unless the new states were religiously homogeneous. He believed that as long as large minorities remained, the same disharmony and "majority vs. minority" struggles would persist.
Historical Precedents: He cited the Greco-Turkish population exchange of the 1920s as a successful model for organizing such a transfer to avoid perpetual civil conflict.
Refocusing on Social Reform: Ambedkar believed that the presence of a large, politically assertive Muslim minority distracted Hindu leadership from addressing internal social evils like caste hierarchy and untouchability. He argued that a "Muslim-free India" would allow the nation to focus entirely on radical social and land reforms.
Military Loyalty: He expressed concerns about the reliability of a religiously mixed army in a divided subcontinent, suggesting that homogeneous populations would ensure undisputed military allegiance to the respective states. (Even now one is constrained to support and implement this advice on seeing Bangladesh which could not be formed with help from India is transforming into a fundamental Muslim Nation to annihilate the progress of India perhaps with hidden help from China and Western Nations of Abrahamic religion. INDI ALLIANCE and particularly mentors of retirees and In-Service are appeasing Muslims from the day of partition till this day for vote bank politics. It is a great detriment Indian working class.)
Why Ambedkar Supported Partition: Remarks on His “Pakistan or the Partition of India”: Samidh Sadhu: This problem can only be solved if Pakistan be made a homogeneous state, devoid of any minority Hindu population. This can be done by (i) changing the borders and (ii) exchange of population. Though India cannot be made homogenous, the depreciation of Muslims would certainly put Hindus to a more advantageous state than they are now. The question is whether the two communities of Punjab and Bengal will agree to redraw boundaries. The Muslims should, if they want a more homogenous state. If they do not, it will mean that they want to tyrannise as many Hindus as possible. Many of the Hindus are unwilling to divide their provinces due to their selfishness – they are reluctant to relinquish their field of job. But, considering the larger menace of Muslim oppression, they should agree to the solution. (Ultimately Bengal and Punjab were divided but Hindus are tyrannised by Pakistan and Bangladesh for the last 78+ years due to first member of dynastic regime overthrowing the advice of DR BR Ambedkar. Now Indi Alliance is blaming NDA regime tyrannise minorities for the past 11 years to keep their vote bank secure.)
Post a Comment