From: Ramanujam Kishore <rbkseetha@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Feb 9, 2026 at 8:40 PM
Subject: Fwd: Fwd:
To: LaxmanParab <lrparab@hotmail.com>, Ramanujam Kishore <rbkseetha@gmail.com>
Subject: Fwd: Fwd:
To: LaxmanParab <lrparab@hotmail.com>, Ramanujam Kishore <rbkseetha@gmail.com>
SIR,
PLEASE,PLEASE,PLEASE, OUR PROFESSIONAL LSG LEGAL STUDY GROUP LAST 11 YEARS HAVE DONE & ARE DOING PUCCA ALLROUND WORK & DEMAND OBEDIENCE TO ARTICLES 14,16 & 21 OF CONSTITUTION. THANX ANYWAY FOR UR ADVICE,
ALWAYS WELCOME EARLIER WAS IT 3 ANNEXURES, I DONT REMEMBER .
REGARDS ,GREETINGS ,FAITH & PRAYERS
ARBKISHORE
On Mon, Feb 9, 2026 at 1:52 PM Laxman Parab <lrparab@hotmail.com> wrote:
Please find attached statement of arrears from Nov 2022 to Jan.2026 as per latest revision in RBI. Also attachedOur Saga of struggle after March 2019 revision till today.As regards 𝐑𝐁𝐈 𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐦𝐮𝐥𝐚 we advise that it may not be demanded in your inastitution.𝐊𝐞𝐞𝐩𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐢𝐧 𝐯𝐢𝐞𝐰 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐭𝐮𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐯𝐢𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬 & 𝐒𝐂 𝐉𝐮𝐝𝐠𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐬 𝐥𝐢𝐤𝐞 𝐍𝐚𝐤𝐚𝐫𝐚 𝐜𝐚𝐬𝐞 +𝐌𝐚𝐧𝐢𝐩𝐮𝐫 𝐒𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐞 𝐩𝐞𝐧𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐞𝐫𝐬 𝐜𝐚𝐬𝐞 𝐲𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐂𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐬𝐞𝐥 𝐦𝐚𝐲 𝐩𝐥𝐞𝐚𝐬𝐞 𝐚𝐫𝐠𝐮𝐞 .𝐈𝐧 𝐑𝐁𝐈 𝐰𝐞 𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐞 𝐚𝐜𝐡𝐢𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐨 𝐬𝐨𝐦𝐞 𝐞𝐱𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐛𝐮𝐭 𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐥𝐥 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐢𝐬 𝐭𝐫𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐨𝐮𝐬 𝐠𝐚𝐩. 𝐖𝐞 𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐞 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐛𝐞𝐞𝐧 𝐠𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐧 𝐫𝐞𝐭𝐫𝐨𝐬𝐩𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐞 𝐞𝐟𝐟𝐞𝐜𝐭 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐍𝐨𝐯.𝟐𝟎𝟎𝟐.𝐁𝐞𝐝𝐬𝐢𝐝𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐯𝐢𝐬𝐞𝐝 𝐦𝐨𝐭𝐡𝐥𝐲 𝐩𝐞𝐧𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐚𝐬 𝐩𝐞𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐀𝐫𝐭𝐜𝐥𝐞 𝟏𝟒 𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝟏𝟎% 𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐦𝐮𝐥𝐚 𝐡𝐚𝐬 𝐛𝐞𝐞𝐧 𝐠𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐝.𝐖𝐞 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐦𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐨 𝐠𝐨 𝐭𝐨 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐒𝐂 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐣𝐮𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐞 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐦𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐀𝐫𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐥𝐞 𝟏𝟒 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐫𝐞𝐭𝐫𝐨𝐬𝐩𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐞 𝐞𝐟𝐟𝐞𝐜𝐭 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐝𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐫𝐞𝐯𝐢𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐨𝐟 𝐰𝐚𝐠𝐞 𝐬𝐞𝐭𝐭𝐥𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐬 𝐢𝐧 𝐑𝐁𝐈.𝐀𝐬 𝐬𝐮𝐜𝐡 𝐪𝐮𝐨𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐑𝐁𝐈 𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐦𝐮𝐥𝐚 𝐢𝐬 𝐝𝐢𝐬𝐚𝐝𝐯𝐚𝐧𝐭𝐚𝐠𝐞𝐬 𝐭𝐨 𝐲𝐨𝐮.𝐈 𝐚𝐦 𝐚𝐝𝐯𝐢𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐢𝐧 𝐲𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐏𝐞𝐫𝐡𝐚𝐩𝐬 𝐑𝐁𝐈 𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐦𝐮𝐥𝐚 𝐆𝐎𝐈 𝐰𝐢𝐥𝐥 𝐠𝐥𝐚𝐝𝐥𝐲 𝐚𝐜𝐜𝐞𝐩𝐭.𝑷𝒂𝒓𝒂𝒃 𝑳𝑹𝐆𝐞𝐧. 𝐒𝐞𝐜𝐫𝐞𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐲𝐀𝐈𝐑𝐁𝐑𝐄𝐀9th Feb 2026
2 comments:
What is the reason for CPI and (CPI(M) for becoming zero and their TUs also in the context of all Indian political parties practice only pragmatism and no ideology? AI Mode:
While the Communist Party of India (CPI) and CPI(Marxist) have faced a significant long-term decline, they have not "become zero" in Indian politics. In the 2024 Lok Sabha elections, Left parties actually marginally improved their presence, winning 8 seats in total—with the CPI(M) securing 4 seats and the CPI securing 2. However, the parties are currently facing an existential crisis due to shrinking geographical footprints and a disconnect between traditional ideology and modern voter aspirations.
Current Electoral Status (2024-2026)
Contrary to the idea of them becoming zero, these parties maintain a small but specific presence in the Indian Parliament and state legislatures:
Party 2024 Lok Sabha Seats Rajya Sabha Seats (Current) Regional Strength (MLAs)
CPI(M) 4 (TN: 2, Kerala: 1, Rajasthan: 1) 4 79 (62 in Kerala)
CPI 2 (Tamil Nadu: 2) 2 20 (17 in Kerala)
CPI(ML)L 2 (Bihar: 2) 0 N/A
Reasons for Political and Trade Union Decline
The decline of these parties and their trade unions (like CITU and AITUC) is attributed to several internal and external factors:
Ideological Rigidity vs. Aspirational Youth: The Left has struggled to attract the youth because of dogmatic notions that do not align with modern, aspirational lifestyles. While global trends move toward free markets and liberalization, Indian communist parties are seen as stuck in "outmoded" 1940s-50s rhetoric.
Failure to Address Caste: A major criticism is that Left parties failed to understand the close link between class and caste in India. Leaders primarily from upper-caste sections could not relate to lower-caste mobilizations, leading to their sideline by Dravidian parties in Tamil Nadu and caste-based parties in North India.
Governance Record in Bastions: The "West Bengal model" is often cited as a reason for lost trust; 34 years of rule did not lead to significant industrial growth, causing the state to lose its status as a city of opportunity compared to Mumbai or Delhi. High-handedness in land acquisition for industry (e.g., the Nano factory in Singur) eventually alienated their core farmer base.
Trade Union "Disruptiveness": Communist trade unions have been accused of being "disruptionist," leading to the closure of factories in cities like Mumbai and Bangalore through continuous strikes. This has led to workers losing faith as they suffered from a lack of employment alternatives.
Strategic and Tactical Blunders: The CPI(M) central committee's refusal to allow Jyoti Basu to become Prime Minister in 1997 is considered one of their biggest "historical blunders".
Additionally, withdrawing support from the UPA government over the Indo-US nuclear deal in 2008 is seen as a tactical error that decimated them electorally.
The Conflict of Pragmatism
While you noted a practice of pragmatism over ideology, the parties actually face an internal struggle between the two:
Coalition Contradictions: To remain relevant, they have had to join alliances like the INDIA bloc, leading to contradictions where they fight against the Congress in Kerala but align with them in other states or at the national level.
Economic Realpolitik: While their rhetoric remains anti-capitalist, Left-led governments in Kerala and West Bengal (historically) have been forced to pursue policies that facilitate private investment and attract global corporations to ensure state development.
National Interest Concerns: The parties have frequently been criticized for positions perceived as contrary to national interest, such as their stance during the 1962 Sino-Indian war or their opposition to various national security deals.
Would you like me to look into the specific performance of their trade union arms, CITU and AITUC, in the most recent national labour conferences (Even if Jyoti Basu became PM anti-Pension AIIEA will not request pension upgradation in1997 seeing their attitude in not insisting on "Oriental Life in 1956 when standardisation of pay scales were achieved after historical strike on 5 Dec. Their aim was working class should be frustrated enough for umpteen causes to become cannon feed of their petty revolution of their political masters.)
Post a Comment