WAGE & FAMILY PENSION REVISION OF PSGICS NOTIFICATION DATED 11.02.2026.
Thursday, 12 February 2026
WAGE & FAMILY PENSION REVISION OF PSGICS NOTIFICATION DATED 11.02.2026.
Increase in Family Pension to a uniform rate of 30% for PSGIC pensioners notified on 11.02.2026.
To all affiliated Units.
Dear Comrades
- *Congratulations - Increase in Family Pension to a uniform rate of 30% for PSGIC pensioners notified on 11.02.2026.
- *Around 15,000 existing family pensioners to benefit.
- *AIIPA would ensure early implementation and pursue other demands of Pensioners.
At last, the long and patient wait of PSGI family pensioners has come to an end. The Government of India has now issued the gazette notification granting enhanced family pension at a uniform rate of 30% of the last drawn pay, without any ceiling, to the family pensioners of PSGI Companies effective from 11.02.2026 [Notification No. SO 719(E) dt. 11.02.2026]
As all are aware, AIIPA has been representing the issue of increased family pension to Insurance Pensioners at par with pensioners of other sectors for the last several years. We organised conventions, demonstrations, dharnas etc. to draw the attention of powers that be. AIIPA units approached about one hundred MPs of various political affiliations and enlisted their support to our cause. A delegation of AIIPA, accompanied by Com John Brittas, MP met the Hon'ble Finance Minister, Smt. Nirmala Sitharaman on 02.08.2023 urging upon her to accord sanction for the benefit recommended by the Board of LIC of India and the Governing Body of GIPSA in September, 2019 and December, 2021 respectively. The Finance Minister reacted that the Government would not stand in the way, if the respective managements had no objection.
But to our dismay, the Government granted the increased family pension only to LIC pensioners with effect from 11.09.2023, leaving out family pensioners of PSGI Companies without any valid reason. We have been approaching all the authorities concerned ever since to end the discrimination. We addressed letters to the Union Finance Minister, the Chairman, GIPSA and the Secretary, DFS requesting them to consider grant of this benefit to PSGI pensioners without further delay. In the meantime, AIIPA conducted agitations to mount pressure on the management and government. We met Chairman, GIPSA several times to press the demand.
A delegation of AIIPA comprising Coms. Satanjib Das, M. Kunhikrishnan and J. Gurumurthy met Shri Parshant Kumar Goel, IAS, Joint Secretary of Department of Financial Services at New Delhi on 27.03.2025 and urged him to accord expeditious approval. The Joint Secretary, DFS, informed the AIIPA delegation that the increased family pension would be granted once the wage revision question is settled and expressed hope to resolve the issue by 30.04.2025. We impressed upon him the necessity to de-tag the family pension issue and to notify it without delay considering the long suffering of family pensioners and the nature of pension being paid through annuity process that might impact on effective date. He appreciated our arguments and assured to consider issuance of gazette notification separately for grant of increased family pension if the wage revision process was delayed.
As recently as on January 21, 2026, a delegation of AIIPA comprising Coms M.Kunhikrishnan, J.Gurumurthy and D.Krishnamurthy met Smt Girija Subramanian (Chairperson, GIPSA) at Mumbai and sought her urgent intervention to break the stalemate. She assured that DFS approval would be obtained on priority and we would get the happy news very soon. The Press Information Bureau of Ministry of Finance vide its Press Release dated January 23, 2026 has since confirmed DFS approval for the agreed Family Pension increase along with the agreed wage revision.
As a result of this Notification, out of a total of 15,582 existing family pensioners in PSGICs, barring 967 family pensioners (in class 4) who are already receiving 30% of last pay, 2,745 family pensioners who are receiving 20% and 11,870 family pensioners who are now receiving 15% of last pay (2745+11870=14,615) will get their family pension revised to 30% with effect from the date of notification, viz 11.02.2026.
We are exploring feasibility of getting the increased family pension benefit through annuity at least from 01.04.2025 (start of the financial year) or a one time lumpsum payment in lieu of arrears. This demand has been placed before Chief Executive, GIPSA on 10.02.2026.
We congratulate the JFTU of officers and employees of Public Sector General Insurance Companies for achieving a decent wage revision effective 01.08.2022, despite all odds. AIIPA takes pride in being part of the JFTU struggles all along. Those of PSGIC retirees who retired after 1.8.2022 will get wage arrears for the period upto the date of their retirement and re-fixation of pension with arrears of commutation difference (non-taxable). AIIPA shall follow up for release of these benefits without delay.
With greetings,
Comradely yours,
General Secretary..
Wednesday, 11 February 2026
Distinction among Pensioners पेंशनभोगियों के बीच अंतर by Finance Bill, 2025 and 8th CPC: Clarification by Govt. | StaffNews
Distinction among Pensioners पेंशनभोगियों के बीच अंतर by Finance Bill, 2025 and 8th CPC: Clarification by Govt. | StaffNews: Distinction among Pensioners by Finance Bill, 2025 and 8th CPC वित्त विधेयक, 2025 एवं 8वें केंद्रीय वेतन आयोग द्वारा पेंशनभोगियों के बीच अंतर: Clarification
Tuesday, 10 February 2026
Our Saga of struggle after March 2019 revision till today-by RBI Pensioners Association
I agree.The RBI pattern of upgradation is constitutionally flawed as it leaves out deceased pensioners and denies arrears. Nothing short of retrospective upgradation will be legally and constitutionally right.
C H Mahadevan
C H Mahadevan
UP-DATION OF PENSION
ALL INDIA BANK OFFICERS ASSOCIATION
Circular No.8/VIII/2026 10.02.2026
To:
ALL STATE COMMITTEES / AFFILIATED UNITS
Comrades,
In the background of the introduction of Pension in lieu of Contributory Provident Fund in RBI in 1990, the need and the necessity were felt by the workforce in our industry also for securing the same as one of the service conditions.
- 2.Accordingly, on 29th October 1993, a settlement was entered into between unions/Associations with IBA to benefit the past retirees also. The effective date of the said settlement was from 1.01.1986.
2(a). The settlement signed under ID Act 1947 clearly laid down the clause for up-dation and other issues connected with the Pension regulations, which is as under:
"Provision will be made by a scheme to be negotiated and settled between the parties to this Settlement by 31st December 1993 for applicability, qualifying service, commutation of pension, family pension, updating and other general condition etc., on the lines as are in force in Reserve Bank of India"
- 3.The Pension regulations were notified in the Gazette by the Government of India on 29th September 1995, in which the Regulation 35 (1) reads as under:
"In respect of employees who retired between 1st day of January 1986 but before the 31st day of October 1987, basic pension and additional pension will be updated as per formula in Appendix I"
Amendment carried out after 2002 in the above regulation is as under:
"Basic Pension and additional pension where ever applicable shall be updated as per the formulae given in Appendix -I"
- 4.The formula was provided as an Appendix in the Bank Employees' Pension Regulations 1995.
- 5.The above provisions related to Regulation 35 (1) was amended, thus removing the period specified in the earlier one. (1.1.1986 TO 31.10.1987)
- 6.In the meanwhile, four retirees from Reserve Bank of India had preferred legal intervention in the Hon'ble High Court Bombay and there was a direction by the Court to give
a point wise reply in the WP 710/2009 filed by Mr. Arvind Ganesh Karnik and others and file the same in the Hon'ble High court of Bombay. As per the operative portion in the said reply filed by DFS,GOI, MOF, Rs 1034 Cr was required for updating the Pension in Public Sector Banks excluding SBI.
- 7.In spite of the clear expression made in the reply by DFS,GOI, Still, GOI vide their letter dated 5.03.2019,advised RBI to revise the pension with effect from 1.01.1986 and subsequently RBI updated the Pension up-to the current wage revision.
- 8.In the conciliation held on 27th and 28th January 2023 as well as in the discussion held on Jan/Feb 2023 with IBA, unions/associations demanded the input details for the purpose of up-dation with IBA to know the impact analysis on the Balance sheet of the Banks.
- 9.There was an earlier exercise of actuarial valuation conducted by Shri. Sharma of Hyderabad and Shri. Basu from Kolkata, in which all the 9 constituents were also engaged. Finally, it was agreed between both parties that there was a short fall of Rs 6000 crores in the Pension Fund. Subsequent to the said exercise, it was agreed mutually that Rs 4200 crores would be allocated to the Pension Corpus by the banks and Rs 1,800 crores should be contributed by 2,65,000 serving employees and 65000 retirees.
- 10.To sum it up, in our considered opinion, as on 1.04.2010, there was no shortfall in the pension corpus.
- 11.Now, as per clause no 11 of Bank Employees Pension Regulations 1995, every year as at the close of 31st March, based on the actuarial calculations, provision to Pension Fund needs to be done by the individual banks.
- 12.As at the close of 31.03.2024, the pension corpus of 11 Public Sector Banks stood at Rs 244468 Crs and SBI Rs 167431Crs.
- 13.In an unstarred question No1828 dated 13.02.2023, Dr. Bhagwat Karad, Minister of State for finance stated that
…………."IBA further informed that the committee set up to look into the matter of Pension up-dation of PSBs has submitted its report to the Hon'ble Supreme Court and the matter is subjudice"
- 14.The number pensioners and family pensioners in the industry is 780171 Including SBI Retirees.
- 15.We, as a trade union, need to protect the interest of the last employee who joined the Bank on31.03.2010 under OPS, who will retire at 31.03.2045.
In securing the up-dation of pension, every effort should be made to envelope all organisations of Bank retirees on priority.
Yours comradely
/S.NAGARAJAN/ GENERAL SECRETARY
Mentioning of our case in SC
Today, out Sr Counsel Shri Nidhesh Gupta along with Sr Counsel Shri Viraraghavan appearing for Fed of Class I Officers' Association appeared before Jus JK Maheshwari for a 'Mention' inviting his attention to the reassurance of our case ordered for listing on top of the table on 4.2.26 and that no further adjournment would be allowed.
After listening, Jus Maheshwari said 'let us see'.
We await the outcome of this mention what date the case would be taken. This is for your information and sharing with members.
-Ranjan Dey Sarkar
General Secretary,
AIRIEF
Our Saga of struggle after March 2019 revision till today.
From: Ramanujam Kishore <rbkseetha@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Feb 9, 2026 at 8:40 PM
Subject: Fwd: Fwd:
To: LaxmanParab <lrparab@hotmail.com>, Ramanujam Kishore <rbkseetha@gmail.com>
Subject: Fwd: Fwd:
To: LaxmanParab <lrparab@hotmail.com>, Ramanujam Kishore <rbkseetha@gmail.com>
SIR,
PLEASE,PLEASE,PLEASE, OUR PROFESSIONAL LSG LEGAL STUDY GROUP LAST 11 YEARS HAVE DONE & ARE DOING PUCCA ALLROUND WORK & DEMAND OBEDIENCE TO ARTICLES 14,16 & 21 OF CONSTITUTION. THANX ANYWAY FOR UR ADVICE,
ALWAYS WELCOME EARLIER WAS IT 3 ANNEXURES, I DONT REMEMBER .
REGARDS ,GREETINGS ,FAITH & PRAYERS
ARBKISHORE
On Mon, Feb 9, 2026 at 1:52 PM Laxman Parab <lrparab@hotmail.com> wrote:
Please find attached statement of arrears from Nov 2022 to Jan.2026 as per latest revision in RBI. Also attachedOur Saga of struggle after March 2019 revision till today.As regards 𝐑𝐁𝐈 𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐦𝐮𝐥𝐚 we advise that it may not be demanded in your inastitution.𝐊𝐞𝐞𝐩𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐢𝐧 𝐯𝐢𝐞𝐰 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐭𝐮𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐯𝐢𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬 & 𝐒𝐂 𝐉𝐮𝐝𝐠𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐬 𝐥𝐢𝐤𝐞 𝐍𝐚𝐤𝐚𝐫𝐚 𝐜𝐚𝐬𝐞 +𝐌𝐚𝐧𝐢𝐩𝐮𝐫 𝐒𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐞 𝐩𝐞𝐧𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐞𝐫𝐬 𝐜𝐚𝐬𝐞 𝐲𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐂𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐬𝐞𝐥 𝐦𝐚𝐲 𝐩𝐥𝐞𝐚𝐬𝐞 𝐚𝐫𝐠𝐮𝐞 .𝐈𝐧 𝐑𝐁𝐈 𝐰𝐞 𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐞 𝐚𝐜𝐡𝐢𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐨 𝐬𝐨𝐦𝐞 𝐞𝐱𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐛𝐮𝐭 𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐥𝐥 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐢𝐬 𝐭𝐫𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐨𝐮𝐬 𝐠𝐚𝐩. 𝐖𝐞 𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐞 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐛𝐞𝐞𝐧 𝐠𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐧 𝐫𝐞𝐭𝐫𝐨𝐬𝐩𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐞 𝐞𝐟𝐟𝐞𝐜𝐭 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐍𝐨𝐯.𝟐𝟎𝟎𝟐.𝐁𝐞𝐝𝐬𝐢𝐝𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐯𝐢𝐬𝐞𝐝 𝐦𝐨𝐭𝐡𝐥𝐲 𝐩𝐞𝐧𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐚𝐬 𝐩𝐞𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐀𝐫𝐭𝐜𝐥𝐞 𝟏𝟒 𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝟏𝟎% 𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐦𝐮𝐥𝐚 𝐡𝐚𝐬 𝐛𝐞𝐞𝐧 𝐠𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐝.𝐖𝐞 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐦𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐨 𝐠𝐨 𝐭𝐨 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐒𝐂 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐣𝐮𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐞 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐦𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐀𝐫𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐥𝐞 𝟏𝟒 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐫𝐞𝐭𝐫𝐨𝐬𝐩𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐞 𝐞𝐟𝐟𝐞𝐜𝐭 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐝𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐫𝐞𝐯𝐢𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐨𝐟 𝐰𝐚𝐠𝐞 𝐬𝐞𝐭𝐭𝐥𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐬 𝐢𝐧 𝐑𝐁𝐈.𝐀𝐬 𝐬𝐮𝐜𝐡 𝐪𝐮𝐨𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐑𝐁𝐈 𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐦𝐮𝐥𝐚 𝐢𝐬 𝐝𝐢𝐬𝐚𝐝𝐯𝐚𝐧𝐭𝐚𝐠𝐞𝐬 𝐭𝐨 𝐲𝐨𝐮.𝐈 𝐚𝐦 𝐚𝐝𝐯𝐢𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐢𝐧 𝐲𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐏𝐞𝐫𝐡𝐚𝐩𝐬 𝐑𝐁𝐈 𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐦𝐮𝐥𝐚 𝐆𝐎𝐈 𝐰𝐢𝐥𝐥 𝐠𝐥𝐚𝐝𝐥𝐲 𝐚𝐜𝐜𝐞𝐩𝐭.𝑷𝒂𝒓𝒂𝒃 𝑳𝑹𝐆𝐞𝐧. 𝐒𝐞𝐜𝐫𝐞𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐲𝐀𝐈𝐑𝐁𝐑𝐄𝐀9th Feb 2026
Monday, 9 February 2026
Our AOR Mr. Garg to mention before Justice J. K. Maheshwari tomorrow (10.2.26) for early hearing keeping it on top of the board.
Our AOR Mr. Garg to mention before Justice J. K. Maheshwari tomorrow (10.2.26) for early hearing keeping it on top of the board. S. K. Awasthi Gen Secy.
'Won't Allow Any Impediment In Completion Of SIR, All States Must Understand ': CJI Surya Kant
'Won't Allow Any Impediment In Completion Of SIR, All States Must Understand ': CJI Surya Kant
Click below:-
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/supreme-court-west-bengal-cji-surya-kant-to-all-states-will-not-allow-creation-of-impediment-in-completion-of-sir-522451
BREAKING | Supreme Court Directs Extension Of West Bengal SIR Deadline, Clarifies Micro-Observers Can't Pass Orders
BREAKING | Supreme Court Directs Extension Of West Bengal SIR Deadline, Clarifies Micro-Observers Can't Pass Orders
Click below:-
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/supreme-court-directs-extension-of-west-bengal-sir-deadline-clarifies-micro-observers-cant-pass-orders-522445
PIB::CBDT seeks stakeholders' inputs on proposed Income-tax Rules and Forms related to Income Tax Act, 2025
CBDT seeks stakeholders' inputs on proposed Income-tax Rules and Forms related to Income Tax Act, 2025 As part wider consultative process, CBDT has launched a ut
Click below:'
https://pib.gov.in/PressReleaseIframePage.aspx?PRID=2225061&RegID=3&LID=1
Sunday, 8 February 2026
Interpreting existing Charts painstakingly prepared, show very acceptable & moderate rise in pension for both RegularPensioners & Family Pensioners
Interpreting existing Charts painstakingly prepared, show very acceptable & moderate rise in pension for both RegularPensioners & Family Pensioners . When one works out from PER ANNUM outlay ,story is a sad tale of tears & woe for Pensioners as can be seen from figures for Regular Pensioners outlay Rs 3098.82 cr/19yrs/32,902= Rs 49,571.45pa ie a pittance of Rs 4130.95 pm per pensioner RP.
For Family pensioners, the less said ,the better.As outlay Rs337.15cr/19/13,374=Rs 13268.08pa ,ie woefully inadequate paltry Rs1105.67pm per FP
This goes to prove & confirm, that after all,nothing huge is granted,pensioners basic pension is unchanged since inception 1/11/1993, IV Pay Commission mode,24 years of agony and statusquo for aged Seniors, moderate rise is necessary & for a sterling institution,which witnessed dedicated services during critical period of formation, foundation, superstructure strengthened ,to pass on the batons to youngsters deservedly } DONE
IBA CIRCULAR ON DR PAYABLE TO PENSIONERS FEB TO JULY 2026
IBA CIRCULAR ON DR PAYABLE TO PENSIONERS FEB TO JULY 2026
Click below :-
Saturday, 7 February 2026
Our case is not appearing in the cause list of Court no 3 for 11th Feb.
Yes, our case is not appearing in the cause list of Court no 3 for 11th Feb.
Let's hope and pray it appears in the Cause list of 12th Feb.
It is for information of all that there were 215 cases before this bench when the same bench was reconstituted with Jus Chandurkar joining Jus JK Maheshwari.
The CJ has now formed this special bench with the same combinatuon.
Let's hope our case will be taken up by the bench sooner than later.
Ranjan Dey Sarkar
Gen. Secretary m,
AIRIEF
Daily Cause list for dated 11.02.2026
Daily Cause list for dated 11.02.2026
Court No. 3
Our case is not listed on 11.02.2026 in Court No. 3
R K SAHNI
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED: 11-02-2026
COURT NO. : 3
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.K. MAHESHWARI
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI
(Time : 10:30 AM)
Note:-
Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.
Parties to file list of dates and brief note of submissions not exceeding three pages, two days before the date of listing.
Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.
Parties to file list of dates and brief note of submissions not exceeding three pages, two days before the date of listing.
Note:-
[ THIS BENCH WILL SIT UPTO 3.25 P.M. ]
[ THIS BENCH WILL SIT UPTO 3.25 P.M. ]
REGULAR HEARING
| SNo. | Case No. | Petitioner / Respondent | Petitioner/Respondent Advocate |
|---|---|---|---|
| 101 | C.A. No. 10259/2017 XII-B | SAIDAI SA. DURAISAMY Versus STALIN M.K. | SAMIR MALIK[P-1] /DEVYANI GUPTA[R-1],RASHMI NANDAKUMAR[R-15],RAKESH K. SHARMA[R-25] PRATEEK KUMAR [INT] |
| [ PART-HEARD BY HON'BLE J.K. MAHESHWARI AND HON'BLE VIJAY BISHNOI, JJ. ] [ AS FIRST ITEM ] IA No. 225830/2024 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS IA No. 176253/2025 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS IA No. 52788/2021 - CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION IA No. 137358/2017 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 2718/2018 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 73962/2017 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 225828/2024 - INTERVENTION APPLICATION IA No. 2717/2018 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES IA No. 73960/2017 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES IA No. 159297/2018 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES IA No. 137356/2017 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES IA No. 14770/2023 - WITHDRAWAL OF CASE / APPLICATION | |||
| 102 | ORGNL.SUIT No. 1/2008 XVII-A | THE STATE OF HARYANA Versus THE STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. | ADITYA SHARMA[P-1] /ANIL KATIYAR,JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA[R-1],NIDHI JASWAL[R-3],RAJ BAHADUR YADAV[R-4] |
IA No. 1/2008 - GRANT OF INTERIM RELIEF | |||
| Connected 102.1 | ORGNL.SUIT No. 2/2007 XVII-A | THE STATE OF PUNJAB Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. | JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA[P-1] ANIL KATIYAR,JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA[R-1],NIDHI JASWAL[R-3],RAJ BAHADUR YADAV[R-4] |
| Connected 102.2 | ORGNL.SUIT No. 2/2011 XVII-A | THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. | NIDHI JASWAL[P-1] ANIL KATIYAR,JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA[R-1],NIDHI JASWAL[R-3],RAJ BAHADUR YADAV[R-4] |
| FOR GRANT OF INJUNCTION ON IA 1/2011 IA No. 1/2011 - GRANT OF INJUNCTION | |||
| 103 | C.A. No. 8236/2009 III | DNYANESHWAR S.S.K.LTD. AND ANR. Versus THE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. | RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL /AADITYA ANIRUDDHA PANDE[R-3],[R-4],SHIVAJI M. JADHAV[R-5] |
| Connected 103.1 | C.A. No. 8237/2009 III | DNYANESHWAR SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD. Versus THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND ORS. | AADITYA ANIRUDDHA PANDE[R-3],[R-4],SHIVAJI M. JADHAV[R-5] |
| Connected 103.2 | C.A. No. 6196/2013 III | SAHAKAR MAHARSHI BHAUSAHEB THORAT SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LIMITED. AND ANR. Versus U.O.I . AND ORS. | M. Y. DESHMUKH AADITYA ANIRUDDHA PANDE[R-3],[R-4],SHIVAJI M. JADHAV[R-5] |
| 104 | C.A. No. 7225/2011 III | RAZIYA BEGUM AND ORS. Versus NAFISA BEGUM ABDUL HAMID . AND ORS. | ANAGHA S. DESAI /FARRUKH RASHEED |
| 105 | C.A. No. 164-165/2013 XII-B | M/S SUMANGALA STEELS LIMITED Versus GOVT OF UTPONDICHRY.BY ITS CHF.SECY. AND ANR. AND ANR. | NIRNIMESH DUBE /ARAVINDH S.[R-1],[R-2] |
| Connected 105.1 | C.A. No. 166-167/2013 XII-B | M/S SUMANGALA STEELS LTD. Versus GOVT OF UNION TERRITORY OF PONDICHERY AND ANR. | PRAGYA BAGHEL ARAVINDH S.[R-1],[R-2] |
| 106 | C.A. No. 8949/2011 XVI | SANJAY KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. | RANJAN NIKHIL DHARNIDHAR[P-1] /MANISH KUMAR[R-1],[R-2],[R-3],[R-4],[R-5] |
IA No. 137473/2022 - EARLY HEARING APPLICATION IA No. 36849/2026 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 268107/2023 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 36848/2026 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES IA No. 268106/2023 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES | |||
| 107 | C.A. No. 6149/2012 XVII | PUNJAB STATE POWER CORP.LTD. Versus PUNJAB STATE ELECT.REGULATORY COMMN. | K. V. MOHAN /PRAMOD DAYAL |
| 108 | C.A. No. 7429/2012 XII-B | STATE BANK OF INDIA Versus BANGALORE MAHANAGARPALIKE AND ANR. | SANJAY KAPUR /E. C. VIDYA SAGAR |
| 109 | C.A. No. 174/2013 III-A | SANT LAL Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. | KAMINI JAISWAL /GURMEET SINGH MAKKER[R-1],NANITA SHARMA[R-2] |
| 110 | C.A. No. 375/2020 IV | UCO BANK AND ORS. Versus SK SHRIVASTAVA | BRIJESH KUMAR TAMBER[P-1] /RESPONDENT-IN-PERSON,[R-1],GAURAV AGRAWAL[R1] |
IA No. 123094/2019 - PERMISSION TO APPEAR AND ARGUE IN PERSON | |||
| Connected 110.1 | C.A. No. 376/2020 IV | UCO BANK AND ORS. Versus S K SHRIVASTAVA AND ORS. | BRIJESH KUMAR TAMBER[P-1] RESPONDENT-IN-PERSON,[R-1],GAURAV AGRAWAL[R1] |
IA No. 143914/2019 - PERMISSION TO APPEAR AND ARGUE IN PERSON | |||
| 111 | Crl.A. No. 1534/2024 II-E | R N KARAIYA Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH | PULKIT AGARWAL /NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR[R-1] |
IA No. 37175/2022 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT IA No. 37174/2022 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 201116/2024 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. | |||
| Connected 111.1 | SLP(Crl) No. 2799/2022 II-E | HARI SINGH KHAIRWAR Versus STATE OF M.P. AND ANR. | NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR[R-1] |
| FOR FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 43994/2022 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 43996/2022 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 199847/2024 FOR APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION ON IA 5681/2025 FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING SUBSTITUTION APPLN. ON IA 5682/2025 IA No. 5681/2025 - APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION IA No. 5682/2025 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING SUBSTITUTION APPLN. IA No. 43994/2022 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT IA No. 43996/2022 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 199847/2024 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. | |||
| Connected 111.2 | Crl.A. No. 1535/2024 II-E | K.K. SHRIVASTAVA Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH | PRASHANT SHUKLA LAW CHAMBERS[P-1] NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR[R-1] |
| FOR FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 41856/2022 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 41857/2022 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT ON IA 41860/2022 FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA 57316/2022 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 57317/2022 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT ON IA 57318/2022 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 201127/2024 IA No. 57318/2022 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT IA No. 41860/2022 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT IA No. 41856/2022 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT IA No. 57317/2022 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 41857/2022 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 201127/2024 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 57316/2022 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES | |||
| Connected 111.3 | Crl.A. No. 1536/2024 II-E | R B SHRIVASTAVA Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH | SANTOSH KUMAR PANDEY NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR[R-1] |
| FOR FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 42747/2022 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 42749/2022 FOR APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING ORIGINAL VAKALATNAMA/OTHER DOCUMENT ON IA 42752/2022 FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA 57459/2022 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT ON IA 57461/2022 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 201123/2024 IA No. 42752/2022 - APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING ORIGINAL VAKALATNAMA/OTHER DOCUMENT IA No. 57461/2022 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT IA No. 42749/2022 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT IA No. 42747/2022 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 201123/2024 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 57459/2022 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES | |||
| Connected 111.4 | Crl.A. No. 1537/2024 II-E | AJAY PANDVIA Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH | AAKASH NANDOLIA[P-1] NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR[R-1] |
| FOR FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 41811/2022 FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA 43289/2022 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 43290/2022 FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA 56573/2022 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 201132/2024 IA No. 201132/2024 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 41811/2022 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 43290/2022 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 56573/2022 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES IA No. 43289/2022 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES | |||
| Connected 111.5 | Crl.A. No. 1538/2024 II-E | NARENDRA SINGH BHADORIYA Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH | AAKASH NANDOLIA[P-1] NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR[R-1] |
| IA FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 42124/2022 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 42128/2022 FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA 43297/2022 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 43298/2022 FOR MODIFICATION OF COURT ORDER ON IA 49304/2022 FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA 56533/2022 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 201125/2024 IA No. 42124/2022 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT IA No. 43298/2022 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 42128/2022 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 201125/2024 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 49304/2022 - MODIFICATION OF COURT ORDER IA No. 56533/2022 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES IA No. 43297/2022 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES | |||
| Connected 111.6 | Crl.A. No. 1539/2024 II-E | KAMAL KISHORE PUNIYANI Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH | PRASHANT SHUKLA LAW CHAMBERS[P-1] NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR[R-1] |
| FOR FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 42502/2022 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 42503/2022 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT ON IA 42504/2022 FOR MODIFICATION OF COURT ORDER ON IA 49254/2022 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT ON IA 49256/2022 FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA 52774/2022 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT ON IA 52776/2022 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 52777/2022 IA No. 49256/2022 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT IA No. 52776/2022 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT IA No. 42504/2022 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT IA No. 42502/2022 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT IA No. 52777/2022 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 42503/2022 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 49254/2022 - MODIFICATION OF COURT ORDER IA No. 52774/2022 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES | |||
| 112 | C.A. No. 10004-10005/2025 XIV-A | MEET MALHOTRA Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. | LAKSHMEESH S. KAMATH /ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA[R-1],MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA[R-2],TUSHAR SINGH[R-3],SUPRIYA JUNEJA[R-4] |
IA No. 181986/2023 - APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING TYPED DOCUMENTS | |||
| Connected 112.1 | C.A. No. 9982-9983/2025 XIV-A | DELHI STATE RIFLE ASSOCIATION Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. | SUPRIYA JUNEJA ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA[R-1],MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA[R-2],TUSHAR SINGH[R-3],SUPRIYA JUNEJA[R-4] |
| IA FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 179483/2023 IA No. 179483/2023 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT | |||
| Connected 112.2 | C.A. No. 9998-9999/2025 XIV-A | NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF INDIA Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. | TUSHAR SINGH ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA[R-1],MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA[R-2],TUSHAR SINGH[R-3],SUPRIYA JUNEJA[R-4] |
| IA FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 221727/2023 IA No. 221727/2023 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT | |||
| 113 | C.A. No. 10534/2024 XII-B | KHAIRAUNNISA BEGUM Versus MAHEBOOB BEE | SHASHIBHUSHAN P. ADGAONKAR /K. KRISHNA KUMAR[R-1] |
IA No. 150754/2023 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. | |||
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)