The weekly Cause list released showed our case to be heard on 11th & 12th February 2026. However when the daily cause list was released for 11th & 12th Feb., our caase did not figure in the part-heard matters to be heard and to make our case steadfast, we advised our Sr Couunsel to make a mention. Besides us, Sr Counsel Shri Ramakrishnan appeaaring for Fed. of Class-1 Officers' Assocociation also did make a mention on 10th Feb. The submissions for a early mention were started by Shri Ramakakrishnan and then Shri Nidhesh Guptpta spoke. Upon hearing the two Sr Counsels, Hon'ble Jus JK Maheshwawari responded by saying ' let us see'.
All in all, our case did not find a mention in the daily cause list of 11th and 12th. The bench had decided to take up a case (not relateed to us) for 2 days while parties to this case were not ready with their arguments and sought adjournment. This case has now been ordered to be taken up on 18th-19th Feb.2026. The chances of our case being taken up next week appear bleak. We have too only wait and watch.
We shall be conveying further details of any development in our case as soon as it is known.
Congratulations - Increase in Family Pension to a uniform rate of 30% for PSGIC pensioners notified on 11.02.2026.
*
Around 15,000 existing family pensioners to benefit.
*
AIIPA would ensure early implementation and pursue other demands of Pensioners.
At last, the long and patient wait of PSGI family pensioners has come to an end. The Government of India has now issued the gazette notification granting enhanced family pension at a uniform rate of 30% of the last drawn pay, without any ceiling, to the family pensioners of PSGI Companies effective from 11.02.2026 [Notification No. SO 719(E) dt. 11.02.2026]
As all are aware, AIIPA has been representing the issue of increased family pension to Insurance Pensioners at par with pensioners of other sectors for the last several years. We organised conventions, demonstrations, dharnas etc. to draw the attention of powers that be. AIIPA units approached about one hundred MPs of various political affiliations and enlisted their support to our cause. A delegation of AIIPA, accompanied by Com John Brittas, MP met the Hon'ble Finance Minister, Smt. Nirmala Sitharaman on 02.08.2023 urging upon her to accord sanction for the benefit recommended by the Board of LIC of India and the Governing Body of GIPSA in September, 2019 and December, 2021 respectively. The Finance Minister reacted that the Government would not stand in the way, if the respective managements had no objection.
But to our dismay, the Government granted the increased family pension only to LIC pensioners with effect from 11.09.2023, leaving out family pensioners of PSGI Companies without any valid reason. We have been approaching all the authorities concerned ever since to end the discrimination. We addressed letters to the Union Finance Minister, the Chairman, GIPSA and the Secretary, DFS requesting them to consider grant of this benefit to PSGI pensioners without further delay. In the meantime, AIIPA conducted agitations to mount pressure on the management and government. We met Chairman, GIPSA several times to press the demand.
A delegation of AIIPA comprising Coms. Satanjib Das, M. Kunhikrishnan and J. Gurumurthy met Shri Parshant Kumar Goel, IAS, Joint Secretary of Department of Financial Services at New Delhi on 27.03.2025 and urged him to accord expeditious approval. The Joint Secretary, DFS, informed the AIIPA delegation that the increased family pension would be granted once the wage revision question is settled and expressed hope to resolve the issue by 30.04.2025. We impressed upon him the necessity to de-tag the family pension issue and to notify it without delay considering the long suffering of family pensioners and the nature of pension being paid through annuity process that might impact on effective date. He appreciated our arguments and assured to consider issuance of gazette notification separately for grant of increased family pension if the wage revision process was delayed.
As recently as on January 21, 2026, a delegation of AIIPA comprising Coms M.Kunhikrishnan, J.Gurumurthy and D.Krishnamurthy met Smt Girija Subramanian (Chairperson, GIPSA) at Mumbai and sought her urgent intervention to break the stalemate. She assured that DFS approval would be obtained on priority and we would get the happy news very soon. The Press Information Bureau of Ministry of Finance vide its Press Release dated January 23, 2026 has since confirmed DFS approval for the agreed Family Pension increase along with the agreed wage revision.
As a result of this Notification, out of a total of 15,582 existing family pensioners in PSGICs, barring 967 family pensioners (in class 4) who are already receiving 30% of last pay, 2,745 family pensioners who are receiving 20% and 11,870 family pensioners who are now receiving 15% of last pay (2745+11870=14,615) will get their family pension revised to 30% with effect from the date of notification, viz 11.02.2026.
We are exploring feasibility of getting the increased family pension benefit through annuity at least from 01.04.2025 (start of the financial year) or a one time lumpsum payment in lieu of arrears. This demand has been placed before Chief Executive, GIPSA on 10.02.2026.
We congratulate the JFTU of officers and employees of Public Sector General Insurance Companies for achieving a decent wage revision effective 01.08.2022, despite all odds. AIIPA takes pride in being part of the JFTU struggles all along. Those of PSGIC retirees who retired after 1.8.2022 will get wage arrears for the period upto the date of their retirement and re-fixation of pension with arrears of commutation difference (non-taxable). AIIPA shall follow up for release of these benefits without delay.
I agree.The RBI pattern of upgradation is constitutionally flawed as it leaves out deceased pensioners and denies arrears. Nothing short of retrospective upgradation will be legally and constitutionally right.
In the background of the introduction of Pension in lieu of Contributory Provident Fund in RBI in 1990, the need and the necessity were felt by the workforce in our industry also for securing the same as one of the service conditions.
2.
Accordingly, on 29th October 1993, a settlement was entered into between unions/Associations with IBA to benefit the past retirees also. The effective date of the said settlement was from 1.01.1986.
2(a). The settlement signed under ID Act 1947 clearly laid down the clause for up-dation and other issues connected with the Pension regulations, which is as under:
"Provision will be made by a scheme to be negotiated and settled between the parties to this Settlement by 31st December 1993 for applicability, qualifying service, commutation of pension, family pension, updating and other general condition etc., on the lines as are in force in Reserve Bank of India"
3.
The Pension regulations were notified in the Gazette by the Government of India on 29th September 1995, in which the Regulation 35 (1) reads as under:
"In respect of employees who retired between 1st day of January 1986 but before the 31st day of October 1987, basic pension and additional pension will be updated as per formula in Appendix I"
Amendment carried out after 2002 in the above regulation is as under:
"Basic Pension and additional pension where ever applicable shall be updated as per the formulae given in Appendix -I"
4.
The formula was provided as an Appendix in the Bank Employees' Pension Regulations 1995.
5.
The above provisions related to Regulation 35 (1) was amended, thus removing the period specified in the earlier one. (1.1.1986 TO 31.10.1987)
6.
In the meanwhile, four retirees from Reserve Bank of India had preferred legal intervention in the Hon'ble High Court Bombay and there was a direction by the Court to give
a point wise reply in the WP 710/2009 filed by Mr. Arvind Ganesh Karnik and others and file the same in the Hon'ble High court of Bombay. As per the operative portion in the said reply filed by DFS,GOI, MOF, Rs 1034 Cr was required for updating the Pension in Public Sector Banks excluding SBI.
7.
In spite of the clear expression made in the reply by DFS,GOI, Still, GOI vide their letter dated 5.03.2019,advised RBI to revise the pension with effect from 1.01.1986 and subsequently RBI updated the Pension up-to the current wage revision.
8.
In the conciliation held on 27th and 28th January 2023 as well as in the discussion held on Jan/Feb 2023 with IBA, unions/associations demanded the input details for the purpose of up-dation with IBA to know the impact analysis on the Balance sheet of the Banks.
9.
There was an earlier exercise of actuarial valuation conducted by Shri. Sharma of Hyderabad and Shri. Basu from Kolkata, in which all the 9 constituents were also engaged. Finally, it was agreed between both parties that there was a short fall of Rs 6000 crores in the Pension Fund. Subsequent to the said exercise, it was agreed mutually that Rs 4200 crores would be allocated to the Pension Corpus by the banks and Rs 1,800 crores should be contributed by 2,65,000 serving employees and 65000 retirees.
10.
To sum it up, in our considered opinion, as on 1.04.2010, there was no shortfall in the pension corpus.
11.
Now, as per clause no 11 of Bank Employees Pension Regulations 1995, every year as at the close of 31st March, based on the actuarial calculations, provision to Pension Fund needs to be done by the individual banks.
12.
As at the close of 31.03.2024, the pension corpus of 11 Public Sector Banks stood at Rs 244468 Crs and SBI Rs 167431Crs.
13.
In an unstarred question No1828 dated 13.02.2023, Dr. Bhagwat Karad, Minister of State for finance stated that
…………."IBA further informed that the committee set up to look into the matter of Pension up-dation of PSBs has submitted its report to the Hon'ble Supreme Court and the matter is subjudice"
14.
The number pensioners and family pensioners in the industry is 780171 Including SBI Retirees.
15.
We, as a trade union, need to protect the interest of the last employee who joined the Bank on31.03.2010 under OPS, who will retire at 31.03.2045.
In securing the up-dation of pension, every effort should be made to envelope all organisations of Bank retirees on priority.
Today, out Sr Counsel Shri Nidhesh Gupta along with Sr Counsel Shri Viraraghavan appearing for Fed of Class I Officers' Association appeared before Jus JK Maheshwari for a 'Mention' inviting his attention to the reassurance of our case ordered for listing on top of the table on 4.2.26 and that no further adjournment would be allowed.
After listening, Jus Maheshwari said 'let us see'.
We await the outcome of this mention what date the case would be taken. This is for your information and sharing with members.
PLEASE,PLEASE,PLEASE, OUR PROFESSIONAL LSG LEGAL STUDY GROUP LAST 11 YEARS HAVE DONE & ARE DOING PUCCA ALLROUND WORK & DEMAND OBEDIENCE TO ARTICLES 14,16 & 21 OF CONSTITUTION. THANX ANYWAY FOR UR ADVICE,
ALWAYS WELCOME EARLIER WAS IT 3 ANNEXURES, I DONT REMEMBER .
Our AOR Mr. Garg to mention before Justice J. K. Maheshwari tomorrow (10.2.26) for early hearing keeping it on top of the board. S. K. Awasthi Gen Secy.
CBDT seeks stakeholders' inputs on proposed Income-tax Rules and Forms related to Income Tax Act, 2025 As part wider consultative process, CBDT has launched a ut