WEEKLY LIST NO. 31 OF 2014
COURT NO. 6
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page
111 of 226
COURT NO. 6
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK
MISRA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH
LALIT
[ ON 04.12.2014 THIS BENCH WILL SIT IN COURT NO. 5
]
56. C.A. NO. 8959-8962/2013
XV SD
LIC OF INDIA AND ORS
VS.
KRISHNA MURARI LAL ASTHANA AND
ANR ETC.
(WITH APPLN. (S) FOR DIRECTIONS AND
DISMISSAL OF APPEAL AND OFFICE
REPORT)
MR. ASHOK PANIGRAHI
MR. RAMESHWAR PRASAD
GOYAL
WITH
C.A. NO. 6995/2013
IV SD
LIFE INSURANCE CORP. OF INDIA & ORS.
VS.
MADAN LAL GANDHI (D) THR. LR. & ORS.
(WITH APPLN. (S) FOR IMPLEADMENT
AS PARTY RESPONDENT AND
IMPLEMENTATION OF COURT'S ORDER
AND OFFICE REPORT)
MR. ASHOK PANIGRAHI
MR. JAY SAVLA
MR. SAJITH. P
MS. SUSHMA SURI
C.A. NO. 9223/2013
XIV SD
L.I.C OF INDIA & ANR.
VS.
FEDERATION RETIRED LIC CLASS 1 AS. &
ORS
(WITH APPLN. (S) FOR INTERVENTION
AND OFFICE REPORT)
MR. ASHOK PANIGRAHI
DR. KAILASH CHAND
MR. JAY SAVLA
MR. SAJITH. P
MR. T. L. GARG
MS. SUSHMA SURI
C.A. NO. 9409-9410/2013
XV SD
L.I.C.OF INDIA & ANR
VS.
MURLIDHAR GUPTA & ORS.
(WITH INTERIM RELIEF AND OFFICE
REPORT)
MR. ASHOK PANIGRAHI
MATTER FOR: 12.11.2014
COURT NO. 6 ITEM NO. 120
SECTION XV
IN
THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE
JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO.
8959-8962 OF 2013
WITH
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS.
9-12 & 13-14
(Applications for directions
to implement the judgment dated 12.01.2010 & dismissal of
civil appeal nos.
8959-8960/2013)
AND
CIVIL APPEAL NO.
9409-10 OF 2013
L.I.C. OF INDIA AND ORS.
...PETITIONERS
VERSUS
KRISHNA MURARI LAL ASTHANA
& ANR. ETC.
...RESPONDENTS
OFFICE REPORT
C.A. No. 895962/2013
C.A. NO. 8959/2013 &
8962/2013
There are two common respondents in the matters. Both the
respondents are
represented through Mr.
R. P. Goyal
and Ms.
Sushma Suri, Advocates
respectively.
Service is complete.
C.A. No. 8960 & 8961/2013
There
are common 28
respondents in both
the matters.
Respondent No.
1 & 28 are represented through
Mr. R. P. Goyal
and Ms.
Soshma Suri, Advocates
respectively. Certificate of
Service has
been received from
the High Court
in respect of
respondent Nos.
23, 5, 9, 1112, 1415, 17 to 27. High
Court
has informed
that unserved notices
have been received
back in
respect of respondent Nos. 4,
6 to 8 & 10 due to wrong addresses
and counsel
for the appellant
has not furnished
the fresh
addresses of unserved
respondents despite this Registry's letter
dated 24.09.2014. High Court
has further informed the respondent
NO. 16 has expired but no application
for substitution has been
filed so far.
...2/
2
Original Records of the matters is still awaited from the
High Court.
It
is lastly submitted that Mr. R. P. Goyal, Advocate for
respondent No.
1 has on
29.08.2014 filed applications for
direction to implement the
judgment dated 12.01.2010 alongwith
application for
dismissal of C.A.
Nos. 89598960/2013 being
infructuous. Applications are
registered as I.A.
Nos. 912 &
1314. ( Copies of the
applications are placed with appeal paper
books.
Service is incomplete upon respondent
Nos. 4, 6 to 8, 10 &
16.
C.A. No. 940910/2013
It
is submitted that
there are two
common respondents in
the matter. Both are served
with AD cards but no one has entered
appearance so far.
Original Records of the matters is still awaited from the
High Court.
Service is complete.
The
matters abovementioned are
listed before the
Hon'ble
Court with this office report.
Dated this the 12th day of November,
2014.
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
|
|||
| Civil Appeal 8959-8962 /2013 |
| STATUS |  |
PENDING |
|
| ||||||||||||
| Subject Category |
| SERVICE MATTERS - RETIRAL BENEFITS |
| Listing Details |
 |
Last Listed on | 12/11/2014 |
| Designed,Developed and Maintained by NIC Computer Cell,Supreme Court of India |
|
Click Here for Latest Office Report [PDF Office Report will be available soon] |
No comments:
Post a Comment