DEAR SHRI.......
I AM IN AGREEMENT WITH YOU THAT WE SHOULD NOT FILE
FRESH APPLICATION AND NEITHER I HAVE FILED ANY APPLICATION
IN NOVEMBER 2014 NOR IN DECEMBER 2014. I HAVE BEEN TRYING
MY BEST FOR EARLY DECISION OF THE CAs. BUT WHAT ABOUT
OUR GOOD FRIENDS, WHO INSPITE OF SAYING NO BY OUR
PRESIDENT MADE A MENTION IN THE SC ON 13TH NOVEMBER
AT A WRONG TIME WITH THE RESULT WE HAVE BEEN SENT
BACK TO THE OLD POSITION RATHER STILL BACKWARDS.
FURTHER MORE, MORE THAN ME THERE ARE CERTAIN
OTHER FORCES WHO ARE PUTTING PRESSURE ON ME
TO ARRANGE A MEETING OF ALL THE FOUR ADVOCATES
ABOUT MENTIONING IN THE COURT OR MOVE AN APPLICATION
WITHOUT THINKING THIS THING CAN BE DECIDED BY US AND
ALSO THE COST INVOLVED IN IT.
I HAVE YET TO FILE MY REPLY IN THE SC.
I WOULD REQUEST YOU TO PLEASE LET ME KNOW WHAT
ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN IN THE MATTER. THOUGH
I HAVE SUCCESSFULLY BEEN FIGHTING THE ISSUES
BUT NOW SO MANY GODFATHERS ARE TRYING TO
COME OVER MY HEAD.
BEFORE CLOSING I MUST MAKE A MENTION THAT IT
DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE POSSIBLE THAT SC JUDGES
ARE IN COLLUSION WITH BABUS AS HAS BEEN EXPRESSED
IN YOUR MESSAGE. I MAY ALSO MAKE IT CLEAR THAT
I DID NOT WITHDRAW THE CONTEMPT PETITION EITHER
AT SC OR AT JAIPUR. IF ANYONE CAN APPRECIATE THE
TONE AND TENOR OF THE ORDER HAS CAN VERY WELL
APPRECIATE THAT IT WAS NOT ON ACCOUNT OF MY
WITHDRAWING BUT FOR SOME OTHER REASONS. I HAVE
EXPLAINED THIS MANY TIMES AND I AM NOT GOING TO
EXPLAIN AGAIN AND AGAIN. I HAVE BEEN WINNING ALL
THE TIME ON MY OWN SHOULDERS SINGLY ON THE
LEGAL SIDE BUT IF ONE OR TWO HICCUPS ARISE
PEOPLE SHOULD REACT IN SUCH A MANNER? IT IS
REALLY STRANGE.
ANY WAY THANKS FOR YOUR SUGGESTIONS
KML ASTHANA
