All pensioners are disappointed by the Judgement.(some are shocked and frustrated again).
Writings of 'Case Managers' - not dependable.All expectations of a
breakthrough are belied.
"20% of the amount as per the impugned judgments pertaining to the High Court, in favour of the respondent-employees"
"so that CA 8959-62/13 3 it can pay to the concerned employees."
Case no is of Jaipur. Does it mean Delhi and Chandigarh Cases have been sidetracked.
Case no is of Jaipur. Does it mean Delhi and Chandigarh Cases have been sidetracked.
"S.L.P.(C)
No.....CC Nos.5437-5440/2015 Issue notice on the applications for
condonation of delay, as also on the special leave petitions."
SLP of UOI NOT yet admitted.
"As the matter relates to grant of enhancement of pension, it shall be listed between item Nos.1 to 5 in the hearing list."
SLP of UOI NOT yet admitted.
"As the matter relates to grant of enhancement of pension, it shall be listed between item Nos.1 to 5 in the hearing list."
Enhancement of pension is mentioned here. So the Judgement is only for DA Neutralisation.
Since
Jaipur Case alone is referred,Sri.Asthana should take immediate and
necessary and immediate steps (even before vacation) to include pension
upgradation to respondent petitioners -if possible to all pensioners.