LIC GROUP MEDICLAIM SCHEME GUIDE

LIC GROUP MEDICLAIM SCHEME GUIDE 


CLICK HERE 

DEAR FRIENDS, CONGRATS, YOUR BLOG CROSSED 4708444 HITS ON 26.04.2026THE BLOG WAS LAUNCHED ON 23.11.2014,HAVE A GREAT DAY
VISIT 'PENSIONERS VOICE & SOUND TRACK' WAY TO CATCH UP ON PENSIONER RELATED NEWS!

Wednesday, 30 September 2015

FLAW IN LIC METHOD

‘PROTECTION’ FOR NEGATIVE ARREARS FOR A FEW CADRES CANNOT RENDER JUSTICE TO ALL PRE-AUGUST 1997 RETIREES
I attach a write-up referring to the Office Note prepared by LIC Central Office Personnel Dept on 18/9/2001 with remarks/recommendations/decisions by the Chairman as a precursor to the LIC Board Meeting held on 24/11/2001.
LIC was very much aware that the formula proposed for upgradation  on 1/8/1997 was anomalous as negative values resulted in a few cadres from Record Clerks  down  to the Sweepers .Surprisingly this fact does not  find a mention in the LIC Board Resolution and LIC has merrily  adopted their proposed  formula  right from the time the illustrative chart was submitted to the Board, subsequently  sent to the Joint Secretary (Insurance) on 31/12/2001 and also  in an updated illustrative chart  sent  on 11/8/2003 with calculations  as at 1/8/2003 to Mr G C Chaturvedi,Joint Secretary(Banking & Insurance).
The focus of LIC Management has  all the time been merely  on the 100% DR neutralization without removal of the pre-August 1997 DR anomaly and on  a half-hearted upgradation on 1/8/1997 WITHOUT REMOVAL OF DR ANOMALY FROM 1/11/1993 AND WITHOUT THE WEIGHTAGE DECIDED  UPON BY THE LIC BOARD ON 24/11/2001.
It took Jaipur Bench of Rajasthan High Court to take serious cognizance of the DR anomaly and come out with its judgment on 12/1/2010 to not only remedy this situation, but also allowing upgradation of pension. But LIC has  continued to play its dubious game of selective misinterpretation of the Board Resolution  without explicit reference to the three High Court judgments in favour of pensioners, for which stay was refused by the Apex Court. This has been corroborated by  a few pensioners who have received  unidentified credits to their bank accounts from LIC ostensibly in compliance of the Supreme Courts  orders  dt 7/5/2015 & 7/9/2015 for payment of interim relief to respondent-pensioners.
We have also  known convincingly how there will be negative arrears for every family pensioner of a deceased pre-August 1997 retiree if LIC continues to follow their usual  method of upgradation of pension for pre-August 1997 retirees.
Hopefully the game being played by LIC will get exposed before the watchful eye of the Supreme Court Bench today, and if not today, sooner than later.
Greetings.
C H Mahadevan