IT IS A TOTALLY FALSE STATEMENT TO SAVE HIS FACE AND MISDEEDS COMMITTED
SO FAR IN THE WAY OF SUCCESS. HE HAS TO EXPLAIN-
WHERE
HE WAS WHEN HE RETIRED, WHETHER HE DID NOT KNOW THE ANOMALIES FOR WHICH
HE IS FIGHTING NOW AFTER KMLA HAD WON ALL THE BATTLES IN THE HIGH COURT
AT JAIPUR IN THE MATTER OF ANOMALIES IN DA/DR, REVISION OF PAY SCALES
FROM TIME TO TIME,
WHERE HIS LEGAL WISDOM HAD GONE,
I WON THE TWO WRIT
PETITIONS AND THEN SPECIAL APPEALS AND THEN THE FIRST SLP OF 2011 IN THE
SC AND THEN THE REVIEW PETITIONS AND THEREAFTER SLPS OF LIC OF THE YEAR
2011
AND NOW WHEN THE SLP OF2013 IS AT THE FINAL STAGE THIS GREAT MAN
HAS COME ON THE SURFACE. EVEN CHANDIGARH AND DELHI HIGH COURT JUDGMENTS
HAVE BEEN OBTAINED ON THE BASIS OF JAIPUR JUDGMENT, WHERE HE WAS THEN?
WHETHER HE IS FIGHTING WITH KMLA OR WITH LIC?
WHETHER IF KMLA WILL LEAVE THE CASE IT WILL BE HIS VICTORY AGAINST LIC?
WHETHER ANY USEFUL BENEFIT WILL BE GAINED WHEN AN UNSUCCESSFUL CRUSADER LIKE
THE ONE TAKES OVER WHEN HE DOES NOT KNOW THE FACTS AND LAW OF THE CASE SO FAR
WHETHER IT IS NOT HE ON ACCOUNT OF HIS WRONG FACTS THE PENSIONER PETITIONERS ARE SUFFERING?
WHY HIS SR ADVOCATE WAS NOT PRESENT AND WHY HE COULD NOT SPEAK ANYTHING BEFORE THE COURT.
WHETHER
AFTER TAKING OVER THE CASE FROM CHANDIGARH HE HAD RAISED ANY OBJECTION
ABOUT THE METHOD OF DEALING WITH THE PENSIONERS IN THE MATTER OF
COMPLIANCE OF THE JUDGEMENT IN P&H HIGH COURT?
WHETHER
THERE WAS ANY BENEFIT TO HIM WHEN HE OBJECTED LIC TO WITHDRAW THE 20%
AND GIVE A GROUND NOT TO MAKE PAYMENT OF 20% NOT ONLY ONCE BUT THRICE.
WHAT BENEFIT HE GAINED.
KMLA
HAD CORRECTLY FILED THE STAY APPLICATIONS AND THAT IS WHY PAYMENT WAS
MADE OVERNIGHT TO THE EMPLOYEES. HE DOES NOT KNOW THE CONTENTS OF THE
STAY APPLICATIONS BUT IS TRYING TO TAKE ADVANTAGE BY CONCEALING THE
MATERIAL FACT AND OBJECT OF THE STAY APPLICATIONS. HE IS DOING SO UNDER
THE PRESSURE OF LIC AND AIIPA AND MISGUIDING THE PENSIONERS.
HE
IS CONCEALING THE MATERIAL FACT THAT AIRIEF AND KMLA HAD LONG BACK
FILED APPLICATIONS IN THE SC FOR IMPLEADMENT AND DISMISSAL OF THE
APPEALS BUT HE HAS NOW FILED ONE AND THAT TOO WITH UTTER FAILURE.
RATHER
IT WAS ON ACCOUNT OF HIS THIS ENDEAVOUR THAT THE FINAL HEARING HAS BEEN
DELAYED OTHERWISE THE CASE MAY HAVE BEEN DECIDED IN THE FIRST OR THE
SECOND WEEK OF FEBRUARY AS PER THE LIST. WHETHER THIS ACT IS IN THE
INTEREST OF PENSIONERS?
WHETHER
HIS FIGHT WITH AND ALLEGATIONS AGAINST KMLA WILL GIVE ANY BENEFIT TO
THE BENEFITS WHEN KMLA HAD BEEN SUCCESSFUL AND HE HAD FAILED/
HE
SHOULD DESIST FROM MAKING FALSE ALLEGATIONS AND CONTUMACIOUS REMARKS
AGAINST KMLA OR AIRIEF INSTEAD CONCENTRATE ON THE LITIGATION WITH LIC IF
HE REALLY WANTS THAT THE PENSIONERS GET ANY BENEFIT. AND NO LITIGATION
ENSUES BETWEEN THEM
IT IS
AIRIEF ALONE WHICH HAS BEEN FIGHTING FOR THE CAUSE OF THE PENSIONERS
AND SUCH PERSONS FOR THEIR ULTERIOR REASONS ARE TRYING TO CREATE HURDLES
AND MAKING UNWANTED HUE AND CRY/
IT
IS ON ACCOUNT OF KMLA FOR THE AIRIEF THAT ALL THE PENSIONERS GOT 3000
AGAINST GOLD COIN, WHEN IT WAS NOT GIVEN, WHERE HE WAS, WHETHER HE COULD
NOT CONCEIVE THIS?
HE DOES NOT EXIST AT THE MOMENT IN THE ENTIRE LITIGATION AND SUCH TYPE OF ALLEGATIONS WILL NOT GIVE HIM ANY ROAD TO SUCCESS.
KML ASTHANA
