All the pensioners who have been
pursuing our legal cases in the Delhi High Court do realise that Shree M S Murty,helped
by Shree C H Mahadevan in the background made a stellar contribution in the
expected success in our case there.There is no intention of belittling the contribution of other
petitioner groups.But,as a matter of fact,a person capable of delivering the desired
results is marked out.And,it may be worthwhile listening to him.
We are going to win in the DHC.The
LIC is bound to go in for appeal to the Hoble S C.
We have got to file a coveat in the
SC soon after the DHC judgement.
MSM has suggested that instead of
all the six petitioners filing as many coveats,let there be one coveat only filed on
behalf of all the petitioners.
Sounds a very mature and sane advice
but likely to be dismissed as unpractical because of known hostility among the
leaders.
Wait.Things are not that bad.Let us
be practical and examine the problem afresh.
A-Chandigarh petitioners are totally
aligned with MSM.
B-Because of poor health and denial
of financial support like before,KML has lost his independence.
C-Hyderabad and AIRIEF have
experimented already to make do with one Sr.Advocate. NG covered ,in a
way,Chandigarh,Jaipur,Hyderabad and AIRIEF.
D-With apologies to GNS SIR,his
advocate Mr Khanna admitted in the Court that he won't take much time as most of the
important points have been covered byNG already.
Needless to remind,N G spoke for the
longest time.
Hardly any need to spend on
avoidable expenditure.Let us leave it to his wisdom.
E-The matter can be discussed with
AIIPA with the help of common friends.
It may be considered worthwhile to
file one coveat only to start with.
S N Chhabra
No comments:
Post a Comment