One Query about Round Two of Legal Battle at Supreme Court ?

Dear All

We all know that total  six petitioners were involved in  current legal battle at DHC and all of them are not left with any other option except to stay  as petitioners at Supreme Court also

The whole scenario about our current legal battle underwent sea change with entry of AIRIEF , AIIPA and Hyderabad as new players at DHC in 2016

Now out of six players  , three namely AIIPA , AIRIEF and GNS Federation  happen to be  all India Organisations and  remaining three  Hyderbad Association ,  Panchkula Association andJaipur Petitioners  fall under local players category.

The show of Hyderbad Association being  one of six petitioners  at DHC was being run primarily by one man army  late Sh  Sreenivasa Murty with his 24×7 involvement besides  total finances  required for legal battle being arranged by him from his personal resources

Chandigarh Petitioners could not afford services of a senior counsel at DHC and hence remained as a symbolic player

And so called architect of our legal battle Sh  K M L Asthana also remained totally absent during arguments stage at DHC

Now much water has flown out of Ganges

DHC Legal battle  was lost on April 27

Sh Sreenivasa Murty also left  Hyderabad Association as well as all his other friends for his heavenly abode on July 8

Five out of six petitioners at DHC have already filed their SLPs at Supreme Court

Four SLPs already clubbed together and likely to be listed on 13th October

Fifth SLP on behalf of Jaipur High Court Petitioners likely to be taken up on 3rd October

And 6th SLP on behalf of Chandigarh High Court Petitioners likely to be filed at Supreme Court by Panchkula Association on 3rd October

And million dollar question relevent once again during 2nd round at Supreme Court is that while three All India Organisations namely AIIPA , AIRIEF and GNS Federation have financial  capability to engage services of  Senior Counsel at Supreme Court but remaining three local players namely Hyderabad Association ,Panchkula Association and Sh KML Asthana at Jaipur do not have  required finances for engaging services of senior counsel

And more so  when AIRIEF itself is involved in legal battle round two so there is no possibility of AIRIEF extending any financial support to either Panchkula or Jaipur.

Under this scenario , will   so called three  local players function as just  symbolic petitioners at Supreme Court ?

The answer about Panchkula Association is Yes

What about remaining two means Hyderabad and Jaipur ?

Any clue ?

Regards

B R Mehta

• 
  

• 
  

  ---