Dear Shri Murty,
LIC has maliciously referred to my writ of 2007 as the first writ petition. Writ Petition No. 654/2007 was speficially for revision of pensions and there is no mention of DR neutralisation. This writ petition was filed on 29/1/2007. The writ with regard to DR was 6676/1998 and that was filed on 23/12/1998. In order to somehow not to pay the full arrears from 1998 LIC has said the 2007 writ petition to be the
first writ petition. Mr GNS may have filed his writ petition in the year 2007 but not on 29/1/2007. He is just taking benefit to propagate his victory but he does not appreciate that this is not the victory but loss since LIC may propagate the case before SC that the compliance of 2007 writ has been done, therefore nothing remains.
But these associations are pursuing only the matter of DA they are not very anxious for Pension
revision and LIC is taking benefit of this throughout.
DHC had decided the GNS earlier writ because they had taken the short cut and produced the judgment of Bhandari Ji but added that SLP is pending against that therefore DHC disposed of the writ petition subject to decision of SC in SLP.
I am not going to protest it on the basis of the year 2007 and 1998 but my SLP has challenged on
the ground of not deciding the issue of revision but has committed constitutional errors by making certain remarks about the validity.
Further more if LIC has taken shelter of 29/1/2007 and the Court has directed to pay to the Petitioners, then why DHC is not being applied to those Petitioners who retired after 1/8/1997, what about them.
KML Asthana
No comments:
Post a Comment