Case is listed at Sr. no. 25 in court no. 4. The Bench who is to hear our cases is reconstituted. There are J. Dipankar Datta, J. K V Viswanathan and J. Sandeep Mehta in the new bench. This bench will sit up to 1 PM. There are feeble chances of our cases being taken up. Shri S S Saxena consulted with Shri R K Singh, who told that our turn may come, as early cases would not take much time. So, Shri Saxena asked me to go to Delhi. Meeting with the Sr Advocate will be on 19/2/2024 after 2 PM. Shri Dattatreya Deshpande, who has thoroughly studied our case and having very good knowledge of LIC's personnel matters and Rules, etc. will also reach Delhi for meeting with the Sr Advocate. We will first sit with Shri R K singh and do initial work of putting flags in the paper book on the points to be discussed with the Sr Advocate so the reference would be easily available. My special emphasis will be on impact of Rule 66 of CCS Pension rules read with Rule 56 of LIC Employees Pension Rules, Rule 35 (1), which was ignored by DHC on the pretext that Appendix III was not challenged, Grave discrimination in the amount of pension among the same cadre based on date of retirement, Amount of Pension is more to the lower cadre officials (feeder cadre) than senior cadre officials because of non-upgradation of pension, Wrong projection of pension pay out ( amount of pension paid to the pensioners is mere 6.8% of the amount of remuneration and welfare benefits paid to the employees), payment of arrears from the due date i.e. date of retirement, FP to be included along with RP, challenge to reliance on obsolete judgments instead of latest judgments having full resemblance on the issues under consideration. etc. We will also provide information/clarification on the points raised by the Sr Advocate, if any.
With best wishes.
M P Agnihotri.
No comments:
Post a Comment