https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/chennai/are-indias-new-labour-codes-a-true-reform-or-just-old-wine-in-a-new-bottle/articleshow/125567279.cms : K.Chandru ex judge of Madras HC writes: Over the past 80 years, bitter disputes between capital and labour have travelled reaching finality in Supreme Court. Simple words have not been made litigation-free. It is sheer hypocrisy on his part to say this when in 1993 he appeared as senior counsel of AIIea before the full bench then 3 member of Madras HC and argued not to absorb temp. employees who put in number of years of service at LIC in collaboration with management resulting the bench accepting his views transferred the case CGIT New Delhi. It was an appeal against a single bench to absorb them like what SBI was doing then and even after. Workers having won at CGIT after two decades, it reached Gopala Gowda bench at SC which also ordered to absorb them in LIC with full compensation. On a review petition the bench reduced compensation to 50%. Not satisfied with this LIC appealed to 3 member bench at SC and got favourable orders of non-absorption and a compensation of Rs.50000 per year of service. Thousands lost their lively hood. It is the service done by anti-worker AIIEA and its senior counsel perhaps cardholder of its mentor. It is a sheer rivalry to AILICEF a sister TU having anti-China ideology as south zone council of Ailicef fully supported altruist lawyer of temp. employees spending his own money both at Madras HC and SC. Having lost TU rights under Sec 48 of LIC act 1981 with no intention to restore bi-partite settlements 85% of staff and their EX are loyal members revolutionary organisation to change the whole world one will not call it a mere TU. Fighting for pension and its upgradation is after all Delusion/Maya according to Bhagvadgita which is held holier than anything in the world by them.
1 comment:
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/chennai/are-indias-new-labour-codes-a-true-reform-or-just-old-wine-in-a-new-bottle/articleshow/125567279.cms : K.Chandru ex judge of Madras HC writes: Over the past 80 years, bitter disputes between capital and labour have travelled reaching finality in Supreme Court. Simple words have not been made litigation-free. It is sheer hypocrisy on his part to say this when in 1993 he appeared as senior counsel of AIIea before the full bench then 3 member of Madras HC and argued not to absorb temp. employees who put in number of years of service at LIC in collaboration with management resulting the bench accepting his views transferred the case CGIT New Delhi. It was an appeal against a single bench to absorb them like what SBI was doing then and even after. Workers having won at CGIT after two decades, it reached Gopala Gowda bench at SC which also ordered to absorb them in LIC with full compensation. On a review petition the bench reduced compensation to 50%. Not satisfied with this LIC appealed to 3 member bench at SC and got favourable orders of non-absorption and a compensation of Rs.50000 per year of service. Thousands lost their lively hood. It is the service done by anti-worker AIIEA and its senior counsel perhaps cardholder of its mentor. It is a sheer rivalry to AILICEF a sister TU having anti-China ideology as south zone council of Ailicef fully supported altruist lawyer of temp. employees spending his own money both at Madras HC and SC. Having lost TU rights under Sec 48 of LIC act 1981 with no intention to restore bi-partite settlements 85% of staff and their EX are loyal members revolutionary organisation to change the whole world one will not call it a mere TU. Fighting for pension and its upgradation is after all Delusion/Maya according to Bhagvadgita which is held holier than anything in the world by them.
Post a Comment