What is the final out come of the case by unabsorbed after 3 member bench of had overthrown gopala gowda bench ordered to bsorb temp employees? AI Mode: In the landmark case concerning temporary employees of the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC), the Supreme Court, through a bench including Justice V. Gopala Gowda, initially ordered the absorption of thousands of temporary workers. Following subsequent review petitions, the court largely upheld the core of the original judgment but introduced modifications regarding the financial compensation and implementation timelines. Final Outcome of the LIC Absorption Case The legal battle, which lasted nearly 25 years, reached its finality with the following directives: Restoration of the CGIT Award: The Supreme Court restored the Award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal (CGIT), which mandated the absorption of temporary workmen into permanent posts. Modified Financial Benefits: In a 2016 review petition decision, the court modified the back wages. While the original order granted full back wages, the revised order directed LIC to pay 50% back wages to the entitled workmen. Inclusion of Superannuated Employees: For workmen who reached the age of retirement during the litigation, the court ordered that they be paid consequential monetary benefits based on revised pay scales up to their date of superannuation. Implementation Timeline: LIC was originally given eight weeks from August 2016 to comply with the modified directions, including the calculation of back wages based on gross salary and periodical pay scale revisions. (This is due to anti-worker, anti-promotion, anti- pension and its upgradation AIIEA which lost TU rights since 1981 collaborated with LIC since the appeal litigation before full (members 3) bench of Madras HC in1993 against single member of HC which ordered absorption)
How many temporary employees of LIC absorbed as per 3 member bench which restored CGIT award in 2016 award but refused compensation for backward wages? In the landmark August 2016 judgment, a three-member bench of the Supreme Court directed the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) to absorb approximately 8,000 temporary and badli (substitute) workers. The key details of this 2016 decision include: Absorption: The bench upheld the earlier 2015 order which restored the Central Government Industrial Tribunal (CGIT) award, mandating the regularization of these workers into permanent Class III and Class IV posts. Back Wages Modification: While the 2015 judgment originally awarded full back wages, the 2016 bench modified this due to the "immense financial burden" it would place on LIC. Instead of full wages, it ordered the payment of 50% of the back wages from 1991 onwards. Case Reference: The ruling was delivered in the case of Tamil Nadu Terminated Full Time Temporary LIC Employees Association v. S.K. Roy. Note on Later Developments: In April 2022, a separate three-judge bench headed by Justice D.Y. Chandrachud reviewed the matter again. This later bench overturned the 2016 order for mass absorption, ruling that it was not permissible for a public employer to regularise over 11,000 workers without a fair recruitment process. Instead, it directed LIC to pay one-time monetary compensation of ₹50,000 for every year of service to eligible workers in lieu of permanent employment. Are you looking for details on the eligibility criteria defined in the 2022 order for this final compensation?
Published on April 28, 2022By Prachi Bhardwaj... https://www.scconline.com/blog/post/2022/04/28/lic-temporary-employee-absorption-supreme-court-judgments-committee-service-law-legal-research-updates-news/ Supreme court: In a long ongoing battle between Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) and its temporary/badli/part-time employees over claim for absorption, the 3-judge bench of Dr. DY Chandrachud*, Surya Kant and Vikram Nath, JJ has appointed a two member committee to carry out fresh verification of the claims of workers who were working between 20 May 1985 and 4 March 1991 for a period of three years shall be carried out. The Committee will consist of: Justice P K S Baghel, former Judge of the Allahabad High Court; and Rajiv Sharma, former District Judge and member of the UPHJS In a 90-pages-long verdict that led to the aforementioned conclusion, the Court observed, “The dispute is now of an antiquity tracing back to nearly four decades. Finality has to be wrung down on the dispute to avoid uncertainty and more litigation. Nearly thirty-one years have elapsed since 1991. We have come to the conclusion that the claims of those workers who are duly found upon verification to meet the threshold conditions of eligibility should be resolved by the award of monetary compensation in lieu of absorption, and in full and final settlement of all claims and demands.”... ‘Can’T Allow Mass Absorption Of Over 11,000 Workers Based On A Flawed Report’. Sc Forms New Committee To Put An End To The Long Drawn Lic Versus Temporary Employees Battle ‘Can’t allow mass absorption of over 11,000 workers based on a flawed Report’. SC forms new Committee to put an end to the long drawn LIC versus temporary employees battle Supreme court: In a long ongoing battle between Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) and its temporary/badli/part-time employees over claim for absorption,... (Still one is unable to get the number of temporary employees absorbed due to collaboration of AIIEA and LIC and its effect of on 2700 assistants not given appointment orders in the last recruitment 8000+ listed on competitive examination. Selfish retirees are being punished for their blind mentality on rights of working class and 100% faith on their mentors)
3 comments:
What is the final out come of the case by unabsorbed after 3 member bench of had overthrown gopala gowda bench ordered to bsorb temp employees? AI Mode:
In the landmark case concerning temporary employees of the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC), the Supreme Court, through a bench including Justice V. Gopala Gowda, initially ordered the absorption of thousands of temporary workers. Following subsequent review petitions, the court largely upheld the core of the original judgment but introduced modifications regarding the financial compensation and implementation timelines.
Final Outcome of the LIC Absorption Case
The legal battle, which lasted nearly 25 years, reached its finality with the following directives:
Restoration of the CGIT Award: The Supreme Court restored the Award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal (CGIT), which mandated the absorption of temporary workmen into permanent posts.
Modified Financial Benefits: In a 2016 review petition decision, the court modified the back wages. While the original order granted full back wages, the revised order directed LIC to pay 50% back wages to the entitled workmen.
Inclusion of Superannuated Employees: For workmen who reached the age of retirement during the litigation, the court ordered that they be paid consequential monetary benefits based on revised pay scales up to their date of superannuation.
Implementation Timeline: LIC was originally given eight weeks from August 2016 to comply with the modified directions, including the calculation of back wages based on gross salary and periodical pay scale revisions. (This is due to anti-worker, anti-promotion, anti- pension and its upgradation AIIEA which lost TU rights since 1981 collaborated with LIC since the appeal litigation before full (members 3) bench of Madras HC in1993 against single member of HC which ordered absorption)
How many temporary employees of LIC absorbed as per 3 member bench which restored CGIT award in 2016 award but refused compensation for backward wages?
In the landmark August 2016 judgment, a three-member bench of the Supreme Court directed the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) to absorb approximately 8,000 temporary and badli (substitute) workers.
The key details of this 2016 decision include:
Absorption: The bench upheld the earlier 2015 order which restored the Central Government Industrial Tribunal (CGIT) award, mandating the regularization of these workers into permanent Class III and Class IV posts.
Back Wages Modification: While the 2015 judgment originally awarded full back wages, the 2016 bench modified this due to the "immense financial burden" it would place on LIC. Instead of full wages, it ordered the payment of 50% of the back wages from 1991 onwards.
Case Reference: The ruling was delivered in the case of Tamil Nadu Terminated Full Time Temporary LIC Employees Association v. S.K. Roy.
Note on Later Developments: In April 2022, a separate three-judge bench headed by Justice D.Y. Chandrachud reviewed the matter again. This later bench overturned the 2016 order for mass absorption, ruling that it was not permissible for a public employer to regularise over 11,000 workers without a fair recruitment process. Instead, it directed LIC to pay one-time monetary compensation of ₹50,000 for every year of service to eligible workers in lieu of permanent employment.
Are you looking for details on the eligibility criteria defined in the 2022 order for this final compensation?
Published on April 28, 2022By Prachi Bhardwaj...
https://www.scconline.com/blog/post/2022/04/28/lic-temporary-employee-absorption-supreme-court-judgments-committee-service-law-legal-research-updates-news/ Supreme court: In a long ongoing battle between Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) and its temporary/badli/part-time employees over claim for absorption, the 3-judge bench of Dr. DY Chandrachud*, Surya Kant and Vikram Nath, JJ has appointed a two member committee to carry out fresh verification of the claims of workers who were working between 20 May 1985 and 4 March 1991 for a period of three years shall be carried out. The Committee will consist of: Justice P K S Baghel, former Judge of the Allahabad High Court; and Rajiv Sharma, former District Judge and member of the UPHJS In a 90-pages-long verdict that led to the aforementioned conclusion, the Court observed, “The dispute is now of an antiquity tracing back to nearly four decades. Finality has to be wrung down on the dispute to avoid uncertainty and more litigation. Nearly thirty-one years have elapsed since 1991. We have come to the conclusion that the claims of those workers who are duly found upon verification to meet the threshold conditions of eligibility should be resolved by the award of monetary compensation in lieu of absorption, and in full and final settlement of all claims and demands.”... ‘Can’T Allow Mass Absorption Of Over 11,000 Workers Based On A Flawed Report’. Sc Forms New Committee To Put An End To The Long Drawn Lic Versus Temporary Employees Battle ‘Can’t allow mass absorption of over 11,000 workers based on a flawed Report’. SC forms new Committee to put an end to the long drawn LIC versus temporary employees battle Supreme court: In a long ongoing battle between Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) and its temporary/badli/part-time employees over claim for absorption,...
(Still one is unable to get the number of temporary employees absorbed due to collaboration of AIIEA and LIC and its effect of on 2700 assistants not given appointment orders in the last recruitment 8000+ listed on competitive examination. Selfish retirees are being punished for their blind mentality on rights of working class and 100% faith on their mentors)
Post a Comment