Bombay High Court Judge Duped Of Rs 6 Lakhs In Online Credit Card Fraud
Click below:-
https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/bombay-high-court/bombay-high-court-judge-duped-of-rs-6-lakhs-in-online-credit-card-fraud-525553
Bombay High Court Judge Duped Of Rs 6 Lakhs In Online Credit Card Fraud
Click below:-
https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/bombay-high-court/bombay-high-court-judge-duped-of-rs-6-lakhs-in-online-credit-card-fraud-525553
5 comments:
Is the Rig Veda Purusha Suktam hymn an interpolation?
Western scholars and Indologists think so, especially the part about caste. Here's what wikipedia says on Varna:
This Purusha Sukta varna verse is now generally considered to have been inserted at a later date into the Vedic text, possibly as a charter myth.[16] Stephanie Jamison and Joel Brereton, a professor of Sanskrit and Religious studies, state, "there is no evidence in the Rigveda for an elaborate, much-subdivided and overarching caste system", and "the varna system seems to be embryonic in the Rigveda and, both then and later, a social ideal rather than a social reality".[16]
Ram Sharan Sharma states that "the Rig Vedic society was neither organized on the basis of social division of labour nor on that of differences in wealth ... [it] was primarily organised on the basis of kin, tribe and lineage."[17]
In the post-Vedic period, the varna division is described in the Dharmashastra literature, the Mahabharata and in the Puranas.[18]
And here are some quotes from various Western scholars and Indologists who claim the Purusha Suktam hymn in the Rig Veda is an interpolation:
As compared with by far the largest part of the hymns of the Rigveda, the Purusha Sukta has every character of modernness both in its diction and ideas. I have already observed that the hymns which we find in this collection (Purusha Sukta) are of very different periods.
— John Muir, [13] That the Purusha Sukta, considered as a hymn of the Rigveda, is among the latest portions of that collection, is clearly perceptible from its contents.
— Albrecht Weber, [14] That remarkable hymn (the Purusha Sukta) is in language, metre, and style, very different from the rest of the prayers with which it is associated. It has a decidedly more modern tone, and must have been composed after the Sanskrit language had been refined.
— Henry Thomas Colebrooke, [15] There can be little doubt, for instance, that the 90th hymn of the 10th book (Purusha Sukta) is modern both in its character and in its diction. (...) It mentions the three seasons in the order of the Vasanta, spring; Grishma, summer; and Sarad, autumn; it contains the only passage in the Rigveda where the four castes are enumerated. The evidence of language for the modern date of this composition is equally strong. Grishma, for instance, the name for the hot season, does not occur in any other hymn of the Rigveda; and Vasanta also does not belong to the earliest vocabulary of the Vedic poets.
— Max Müller, [16]
Also,
Susan Bayly summarises that Manusmriti and other scriptures helped elevate Brahmins in the social hierarchy and these were a factor in the making of the varna system, but the ancient texts did not in some way "create the phenomenon of caste" in India.[76]
This four varna-related verse is controversial and is believed by many scholars, such as Max Müller, to be a corruption and a medieval or modern era insertion into the text.
Explore the genetic evidence regarding the start of endogamy or the specific legal reforms introduced by B.R. Ambedkar to dismantle the system?: AI Mode:
Genetic and historical evidence suggests that endogamy in India—the practice of marrying strictly within a social group—became a widespread cultural norm roughly 1,900 to 2,000 years ago, effectively "freezing" the caste system in place. B.R. Ambedkar identified this practice as the "essence" of caste and sought to dismantle it through transformative legal reforms, most notably the Hindu Code Bill.
Genetic Evidence: The Shift to Endogamy
Large-scale genomic studies, such as those led by the Reich Laboratory at Harvard, provide a timeline for the onset of endogamy in India:
Period of Mixture (4,200 to 1,900 years ago): Before the rigid caste system, there was a "flurry of intermarriage" between the two major ancestral populations—Ancestral North Indians (ANI) and Ancestral South Indians (ASI).
The Endogamic Shift (~100 CE): Around 1,900 years ago, genetic data shows a dramatic shift where mating between different groups became rare. This change corresponds with the "classic" period of ancient Indian history and the codification of social laws like the Manusmriti.
Founder Effects: Because groups stopped mixing, many Indian populations today show strong "founder effects," where specific genetic mutations are passed down within a community, increasing the risk of recessive genetic disorders.
Ambedkar’s Legal Reforms to Dismantle Caste
Ambedkar argued that since endogamy was the "sole distinguishing feature" of caste, the only way to annihilate the system was to legally and socially encourage inter-caste marriage. As India’s first Law Minister, he introduced the Hindu Code Bill (1947–1951) to achieve this through several specific mechanisms:
Abolishing Caste as a Requirement for Marriage:
The Bill sought to repeal "birthright laws" that prohibited inter-caste marriages, making such unions legally valid and sanctioned by the state.
Introduction of Monogamy and Divorce:
Ambedkar viewed "sacramental marriage" as a tool of patriarchy that maintained "caste purity" through the control of women (e.g., through child marriage and enforced widowhood). By introducing legal divorce and mandatory monogamy, he aimed to break the "water-tight compartments" of caste.
Gender Equality in Inheritance:
The Bill provided daughters with an equal share in property, challenging the patriarchal lineage that kept wealth and social status locked within specific caste-based "joint families."
Overriding Customary Law:
Ambedkar removed "saving clauses" that protected local customs, insisting that a single, rational common law should override any religious or customary practice used to justify caste hierarchy.
Note on Outcomes: Due to intense opposition from conservative factions, Ambedkar resigned in 1951 when the Bill failed to pass in its entirety. However, its core provisions were later enacted as four separate laws between 1955 and 1956, including the Hindu Marriage Act and the Hindu Succession Act.
Would you like to explore the specific arguments Ambedkar used in his famous essay "Annihilation of Caste" regarding the role of women in maintaining this system?
Purusha Sukta might be an interpolated one.
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purusha_Sukta).
It was mentioned in the material at the above link as follows:
"Many 19th and early 20th century scholars questioned as to when parts or all of Purusha Sukta were composed, and whether some of these verses were present in the ancient version of Rigveda. They suggest it was interpolated in post-Vedic era and is a relatively modern origin of Purusha Sukta.
Consider the following:
Indra was the Supreme God in Rig Veda period.
https://books.google.co.in/books?id=Vhkt5K1fw2wC&pg=PA177&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
In one of the Shanti Mantras "Vayu" was equalled to the "Brahman".
Om sham no mitrah sham varunah sham no bhavatvaryamaa Sham na indro brihaspatih sham no vishnururukramah
Namo brahmane namaste vaayo twameva pratyaksham Brahmaasi twaameva pratyaksham brahma vadishyaami Tanmaamavatu tadvaktaaramavatu Avatu maam avatu vaktaaram.Om shantih shantih shantih! Meaning: May Mitra, Varuna and Aryama be good to us! May Indra and Brihaspati and Vishnu of great strides be good to us!
Prostrations unto Brahman! (Supreme Reality). Prostrations to Thee, O Vayu! Thou art the visible Brahman. I shall proclaim Thee as the visible Brahman. I shall call Thee the just and the True. May He protect the teacher and me! May he protect the teacher!
Om peace, peace, peace!
However, in Purusha Suktam, Indra and Vaayu were stated to have emanated from "Purusha". Candramaa Manaso Jaatash-Cakssoh Suuryo Ajaayata | Mukhaad-Indrash-Ca-Agnish-Ca Praannaad-Vaayur-Ajaayata ||13||
13.1: The Moon was born from His Mind and the Sun was born from His Eyes,
13.2: Indra and Agni (Fire) were born from His Mouth, and Vayu (Wind) was born from His Breath.
Hence, this Purusha Sukta might have been composed much later to the composition of Shanti Mantras and thus, an interpolated one (inserted at a later date). Srimannarayana K V: I dont think that it proves that Purusha suktam is an interpolation.If we see the hymns of Rig veda,Then not only Indra but Agni,Rudra,Vishnu are also stated as supreme Lord of the universe.The vedic Gods are not like Greek Gods that Zeus is Supreme and all others are its subordinates. Puranas may state that this diety is supreme and others it s subordinates but they are for this purpose only ,They are to develop bhakti for particular god either Shiva or Vishnu or Devi. Purusha suktam being an interpolation is a western speculation, Those same scholars believe in Indo aryan invasion theory too:). –
Karmanya Nanda:
Rather in the case of Vayu,That shanti mantra is found in Upanishads.They state that Everything is brahman which means every deva is nothing but manifestation of brahman only, Svestavara Upanishad states that Rudra is brahman. Even in one Rig veda verse Soma is said to be father of Indra That doest mean it is also an interpolation . –
Karmanya Nanda: The whole hymn is not an interpolation, but one of the verses may or may not be an interpretation. –
Terjij Kassal:
Ambedkar, Dr. B. R: CASTES IN INDIA: Their Mechanism, Genesis and Development Many of us, I dare say, have witnessed local, national or international expositions of material objects that make up the sum total of human civilization. But few can entertain the idea of there being such a thing as an exposition of human institutions. Exhibition of human institutions is a strange idea ; some might call it the wildest of ideas. But as students of Ethnology I hope you will not be hard on this innovation, for it is not so, and to you at least it should not be strange. You all have visited, I believe, some historic place like the ruins of Pompeii, and listened with curiosity to the history of the remains as it flowed from the glib tongue of the guide. In my opinion a student of Ethnology, in one sense at least, is much like the guide. Like his prototype, he holds up (perhaps with more seriousness and desire of self-instruction) the social institutions to view, with all the objectiveness humanly possible, and inquires into their origin and function. Most of our fellow students in this Seminar, which concerns itself with primitive versus modern society, have ably acquitted themselves along these lines by giving lucid expositions of the various institutions, modern or primitive, in which they are interested. It is my turn now, this evening, to entertain you, as best I can, with a paper on “Castes in India : Their mechanism, genesis and development” I need hardly remind you of the complexity of the subject I intend to handle. Subtler minds and abler pens than mine have been brought to the task of unravelling the mysteries of Caste ; but unfortunately it still remains in the domain of the “unexplained”, not to say of the “un-understood” I am quite alive to the complex intricacies of a hoary institution like Caste, but I am not so pessimistic as to relegate it to the region of the unknowable, for I believe it can be known. The caste problem is a vast one, both theoretically and practically. Practically, it is an institution that portends tremendous consequences. It is a local problem, but one capable of much wider mischief for “as long as caste in India does exist, Hindus will hardly intermarry or have any social intercourse with outsiders ; and if Hindus migrate to other regions on earth, Indian caste would become a world problem.”1 Theoretically, it has defied a great many scholars who have taken upon themselves, as a labour of love, to dig into its origin. Such being the case, I cannot treat the problem in its entirety. Time, space and acumen, I am afraid, would all fail me, if I attempted to do otherwise than limit myself to a phase of it, namely, the genesis, mechanism and spread of the caste system. I will strictly observe this rule, and will dwell on extraneous matters only when it is necessary to clarify or support a point in my thesis. To proceed with the subject. According to well-known ethnologists, the population of India is a mixture of Aryans, Dravidians, Mongolians and Scythians. All these stocks of people came into India from various directions and with various cultures, centuries ago, when they were in a tribal state. They all in turn elbowed their entry into the country by fighting with their predecessors, and after a stomachful of it settled down as peaceful neighbours. Through constant contact and mutual intercourse they evolved a common culture that superseded their distinctive
cultures. It may be granted that there has not been a thorough amalgamation of the various stocks that make up the peoples of India, and to a traveller from within the boundaries of India the East presents a marked contrast in physique and even in colour to the West, as does the South to the North. But amalgamation can never be the sole criterion of homogeneity as predicated of any people. Ethnically all people are heterogeneous. It is the unity of culture that is the basis of homogeneity. Taking this for granted, I venture to say that there is no country that can rival the Indian Peninsula with respect to the unity of its culture. It has not only a geographic unity, but it has over and above all a deeper and a much more fundamental unity—the indubitable cultural unity that covers the land from end to end. But it is because of this homogeneity that Caste becomes a problem so difficult to be explained. If the Hindu Society were a mere federation of mutually exclusive units, the matter would be simple enough. But Caste is a parcelling of an already homogeneous unit, and the explanation of the genesis of Caste is the explanation of this process of parcelling. Before launching into our field of enquiry, it is better to advise ourselves regarding the nature of a caste I will therefore draw upon a few of the best students of caste for their definitions of it: (1) Mr. Senart, a French authority, defines a caste as “a close corporation, in theory at any rate rigorously hereditary : equipped with a certain traditional and independent organisation, including a chief and a council, meeting on occasion in assemblies of more or less plenary authority and joining together at certain festivals : bound together by common occupations, which relate more particularly to marriage and to food and to questions of ceremonial pollution, and ruling its members by the exercise of jurisdiction, the extent of which varies, but which succeeds in making the authority of the community more felt by the sanction of certain penalties and, above all, by final irrevocable exclusion from the group”.
Post a Comment