I had sought information on names of the Trustees of the LIC Employees Pension Fund and i got a reply denying the information.The reply is attached.
I have today appealed to the FAA online.
C H Mahadevan
Click below:-
6 comments:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i9LiIvddIFQ
Muslims Thought Islam Was Taking Over → The Internet Just DESTROYED That From Within Fall of Nations 8 Aug 2026
00:00:00 - Something BAD Just Happened to ISLAM - And It’s Coming From Within
00:19:26 - Muslim Tries to Leave Islam ⟶ Then THIS Happens to Him...
00:41:38 - ISLAM Is About to be ERASED From the MAP!
01:08:06 - Something Is Silently ENDING Arab MUSLIMS
01:37:28 - The WORST Thing in History Just Happened to ISLAM
02:00:45 - Still Think ISLAM is Taking Over? WATCH THIS Before You Speak Again
02:24:21 - Something BAD Is About to Happen To 2.06 Billion Muslims
The fastest growing religion on Earth just hit 2 billion followers, and it's in more trouble than it's ever been. Not because Muslims are leaving. Most
0:099 seconds aren't. Not because mosques are emptying. In many places, they're full.
0:1313 seconds But because something far more dangerous is happening inside Islam than mass apostasy. The people who control it are losing their grip. And the generation
0:2222 seconds replacing them, well, they're not asking for permission. This is how the next generation of Muslims can be the last generation of Islamic authority. as we
0:3030 seconds have known it. To understand what's breaking, you need to understand what held it together for so long. Now, for centuries, Islam wasn't just a religion in the way that most Westerners think of
0:3838 secondsreligion. A private belief, something you practice on Sundays or keep to yourself. In much of the Muslim world, Islam was the operating system. It
0:4646 secondsgoverned courts, contracts, inheritance, marriage, dietary law, seasonal rhythms, and the moral vocabulary through which entire societies understood right and
0:5555 secondswrong. To be born in this world was to be born inside a system. And that system was total and religious authority wasn't centralized the way the Catholic Church
1:031 minute, 3 secondswas. There was no single pope. Instead, it was distributed, spread across scholars, judges, teachers, Sufi masters, and local clerics whose
1:121 minute, 12 secondslegitimacy came from proximity, reputation, and the slow movement of information. If you had a question about inheritance law, you would ask the
1:201 minute, 20 secondsneighborhood jurist. If you needed a ruling on a contract, you went to the Kadi. If your child needed education, the Madrasa provided it along with the
1:281 minute, 28 secondsmoral framework that came attached. This was a layered ecosystem of learning and social control so thick, so deeply woven into daily life that questioning it
1:371 minute, 37 secondswasn't just taboo. It was almost structurally impossible. You couldn't challenge what you couldn't compare. And for centuries, the average person had
1:441 minute, 44 secondsnothing to compare it to. Books were rare. Literacy was limited. Travel was dangerous. The horizon of your moral world ended at the edge of your
1:531 minute, 53 secondscommunity. That system survived invasions. It survived the Mongols. It survived colonial occupations and the rise of modern nation states. In many
2:022 minutes, 2 secondsplaces, postcolonial governments actually folded religious institutions directly into state machinery, ministries of religious affairs,
2:102 minutes, 10 secondsnationalized endowments, state controlled religious curricula. From Morocco to Malaysia, from Egypt to Pakistan, governments recognized that
controlling the mosques meant controlling the people. Religion didn't just shape identity. It became a tool of governance, a weapon of legitimacy, a
2:272 minutes, 27 secondsway for rulers to claim divine backing for very earthly power. And that's where the fault line begins. Because when faith is tied to state power, a
2:352 minutes, 35 secondstheological disagreement doesn't stay theological. It becomes political, constitutional, explosive. And when young people start questioning the
2:422 minutes, 42 secondsclerics, they're not just questioning God, they're questioning the government, that makes doubt a national security issue. But the system held as long as
2:512 minutes, 51 secondsinformation stayed scarce. And then it didn't. The internet didn't destroy Islam. It destroyed the informationational monopoly that made Islamic authority unchallengeable.
3:013 minutes, 1 secondScholars of Islam and the media have documented the shift for over two decades. Researchers like Dale Ikeleman, John Anderson, and Gary Bunt have
3:093 minutes, 9 secondsdescribed how new media, first cassettes and satellite TV, and then internet and social platforms didn't just spread religious messages. They multiplied the number of voices able to contest them.
3:203 minutes, 20 secondsThey created what scholars call new Muslim publics. Fragmented, decentralized, impossible to control.
3:273 minutes, 27 secondsSuddenly, a teenager in Cairo could compare a Saudi cleric's ruling with a Turkish scholars interpretation and a secular legal framework from
3:343 minutes, 34 secondsScandinavia. All before breakfast, a young woman in Jakarta could watch a feminist tapsier discussion on YouTube and then scroll to a Salafi preacher
3:423 minutes, 42 secondsdemanding that she cover her face and then land on an ex-Muslim forum where people shared stories of leaving the faith all within the same hour. And that
3:513 minutes, 51 secondscomparison is the weapon. It's not atheism, not Western propaganda, just comparison. comparison between moral systems, between gender norms, between
3:593 minutes, 59 secondscountries where apostasy carries a death sentence, and countries where doubt is treated as a normal phase of growing up.
4:064 minutes, 6 secondsBetween societies that enforce religious laws through morality police, and societies that treat religion as an entirely personal matter, between a
4:144 minutes, 14 secondscleric who says music is forbidden and a Muslim musician with 10 million followers. between a fatwa banning women from driving and a Saudi woman posting
4:224 minutes, 22 secondsvideos from behind the wheel. The internet didn't create doubt, it just created options. And options are the one thing a monopoly cannot tolerate. And
4:314 minutes, 31 secondsmodern digital life makes this comparison automatic. We live in an era that trains people from childhood to customize everything. Personal feeds,
4:384 minutes, 38 secondspersonal playlists, personal brands, personal moral worlds. Large-scale values research like the world value survey has documented a global shift in
4:474 minutes, 47 secondsmany societies from survival values toward self-expression values tied to rising expectations of autonomy,
4:544 minutes, 54 secondstolerance, and individual choice. When that expectation of choice reaches the realm of belief, systems built on collective conformity face a test that
5:035 minutes, 3 secondsthey were never designed for. But here's where it gets complicated. Because the data, it doesn't show what most people expect. The loudest voices online will
5:115 minutes, 11 secondstell you Islam is collapsing, that millions are leaving, that mosques are emptying, that it's an avalanche. But it's not. According to Pew Research
Center's landmark 2025 global religious landscape study, the Muslim population grew by 347
5:265 minutes, 26 secondsmillion people between 2010 and 2020, more than every other religion on Earth combined. That growth was larger in
5:345 minutes, 34 secondsabsolute numbers than the entire global Buddhist population. Islam was the world's fastest growing major faith in that decade driven overwhelmingly by
5:425 minutes, 42 secondsdemographics. Higher birth rates, a younger median age, a population momentum from decades of growth, not by mass conversion. Pew's senior
5:505 minutes, 50 secondsdemographer Conrad Hackett put it plainly. The growth came because more Muslims are being born than dying.
5:565 minutes, 56 secondsReligious switching played almost no role. 2 billion people now identify as Muslim worldwide, and that number keeps climbing. And when Pew looked
6:046 minutes, 4 secondsspecifically at religious switching in 13 countries with large enough Muslim samples to analyze, the results were striking. 3% or fewer of all adults had
6:126 minutes, 12 secondseither left or entered Islam in most countries studied. In Indonesia, the world's largest Muslim majority nation, the share identifying as Muslim was
6:206 minutes, 20 secondsessentially identical to the share raised Muslim, with fewer than 1% switching in either direction. Now, retention rates sat above 90% in most
6:286 minutes, 28 secondsMuslim majority nations. Even in the United States, roughly threequarters of those raised Muslim still identify as Muslim in adulthood. So no, this is not
6:376 minutes, 37 secondsa story of mass exodus. And anyone telling you that Islam is dying hasn't looked at the numbers. But don't tune out yet because what the data does show
6:456 minutes, 45 secondsis far more destabilizing than just raw departure numbers. And it's the kind of shift that doesn't make headlines because it's not happening in dramatic
6:536 minutes, 53 secondspublic apostasy, but in the quiet erosion of something that's much harder to rebuild once it's lost. Trust. It shows volatility, fragmentation, and a
7:027 minutes, 2 secondsslow grinding erosion of trust in the people who claim to speak for God. Arab Barometer, one of the most rigorous polling operations in the Middle East
7:097 minutes, 9 secondsand North Africa, conducted large-scale face-to-face surveys across multiple countries and multiple waves, and they've tracked the shift in granular
7:187 minutes, 18 secondsdetail. Between 2013 and 2018, trust in religious leaders across the Arab world dropped from 51% to 40%. Trust in
7:277 minutes, 27 secondsIslamist political parties fell even harder from 35% to only 20%. The share of respondents describing themselves as
7:357 minutes, 35 secondsnot religious rose from 8% [music] to 13%. And among youth under 30, that figure climbed to 18%. Look at the
7:447 minutes, 44 secondscountry level numbers and the picture sharpens. In Tunisia, nearly half of young people describe themselves as non-religious, a number comparable to
7:517 minutes, 51 secondsthat of American youth. A third of young Libyans said the same. a quarter of young Algerians, a fifth of young Egyptians, and the share who believed
7:597 minutes, 59 secondsreligious leaders should influence government decisions was dropping steadily across the board. Meanwhile, Iraq presented a fascinating
8:078 minutes, 7 secondscontradiction. Nearly half of Iraqis described themselves as religious, up from 39% in 2013. Yet, the share who
8:148 minutes, 14 secondsactually attend Friday prayers was cut nearly in half, falling to just 33%.
8:198 minutes, 19 secondsPeople were claiming religion while abandoning its practices. Faith was becoming personal. detached from institutional obedience. As one Arab
8:278 minutes, 27 secondsbarometer analyst put it, "Religion is increasingly personal." And then just when it looked like a straight line towards secularization, the trend
reversed. Arab Barometers analysis in the early 2020s found that youth religiosity actually rebounded in several countries. Fewer young
8:448 minutes, 44 secondsrespondents described themselves as not religious. Engagement with religious texts, reading or listening to scripture daily, it went up. And the likely
8:538 minutes, 53 secondsdrivers, pandemic stress, economic crisis, political instability, religion as a coping mechanism, as a source of community when everything else was
9:029 minutes, 2 secondsfalling apart, as it always has been during periods of crisis. So, religiosity isn't a one-way escalator downward. It swings. It polarizes. It
9:109 minutes, 10 secondsfractures into a spectrum of identities that didn't exist a generation ago, and that traditional survey categories weren't built to capture. Research from
9:189 minutes, 18 secondsTurkey illustrates this vividly. One study found that only about a third of respondents define themselves as orthodox religious while a larger share
9:279 minutes, 27 secondsidentify simply as believers and a significant cluster identify with categories of deism non-belief or religious indecision. The old binary
9:369 minutes, 36 secondsdevout or apostate. It's dissolving into something far messier and far harder for institutions to manage. The numbers didn't show extinction. They show
9:449 minutes, 44 secondsdestabilization. And destabilization is far more dangerous than decline. If you're following the pattern here, be sure to subscribe because what comes
9:529 minutes, 52 secondsnext isn't just about Islam. It's about what happens when any system built on enforcement meets a generation that expects consent. Here is the shift that
10:0010 minuteschanges everything. For centuries, you were born Muslim the way that you were born into a family name. It wasn't chosen. It was assigned. And the entire
10:0810 minutes, 8 secondssocial architecture, law, community, identity, consequence, reinforced that assignment so thoroughly that opting out
10:1510 minutes, 15 secondswasn't just difficult. In many places, it was legally impossible. That assumption is breaking. And Iran is the
10:2210 minutes, 22 secondssharpest case study of why. The Islamic Republic Census claims 99.5% of Iranians are Muslim. But a major 2020 survey by
10:3210 minutes, 32 secondsGam, the group for analyzing and measuring attitudes in Iran, a Netherlands-based research organization, told a radically different story. Using
10:4010 minutes, 40 secondsanonymous online methods, they surveyed over 50,000 respondents, roughly 90% living inside Iran. The results shattered the state's official
10:4810 minutes, 48 secondsnarrative. Only 40% identified as Muslim. Let that sink in for a moment.
10:5310 minutes, 53 secondsIn a country where the state says 99.5% are Muslim, fewer than half actually claim the label when they can answer
11:0011 minuteswithout fear. 32% identify as Shia specifically in a country whose entire government, constitution, and
11:0711 minutes, 7 secondsrevolutionary identity are built on Shia Islam. 9% called themselves atheists. 7% chose spiritual. 8% identified as
11:1611 minutes, 16 secondsZoroastrian, widely interpreted not as literal Zoroastrian practices, but as a statement of Persian nationalism, a
11:2311 minutes, 23 secondsdeliberate rejection of imposed Islamic identity in favor of pre-Islamic heritage. 22% refused to identify with
11:3111 minutes, 31 secondsany category at all. And the political implications cut even deeper. 68% agreed that religious prescriptions should be
excluded from legislation even if believers hold a parliamentary majority.
11:4411 minutes, 44 seconds72% opposed compulsory hijab laws. 47% reported losing their religion during their lifetime. Nearly 60% say that they
11:5211 minutes, 52 secondsdon't perform daily Muslim prayer. Now look, online surveys do have methodological limitations. The researchers themselves acknowledge that
12:0012 minutesand the sample SKUs toward literate internet connected Iranians. But follow-up GMAN surveys in 2022 and 23
12:0712 minutes, 7 secondswith samples ranging up to 150,000 respondents found similar results.
12:1212 minutes, 12 secondsRoughly half identify with labels like atheistic or agnostic or spiritual or just no religion. The pattern held. And
12:1912 minutes, 19 secondsthe sheer scale of divergence between the state's official narrative and what Iranians report when they can answer anonymously tells us something enormous.
12:2812 minutes, 28 secondsWhen religion is fused to coercive state power for decades, the backlash doesn't stay quiet. It redefes the entire
12:3512 minutes, 35 secondsrelationship between faith and law. A religion can survive doubt. It can survive debate. It can survive mockery.
12:4212 minutes, 42 secondsBut it struggles to survive when obedience becomes optional. And that realization forces every Islamic institution on earth to make a choice
12:5012 minutes, 50 secondsbecause there are only two paths forward. Path one is to adapt. Embrace what scholars call post-Islamism. Not anti-Islamic, but a rethinking of religion's role in society and politics.
13:0113 minutes, 1 secondIslam as a powerful moral and spiritual tradition that operates with personal autonomy and pluralist governance. Faith
13:0813 minutes, 8 secondsas conviction, not compliance. Religion as chosen, not commanded. Some scholars and movements are already pushing in this direction, emphasizing rights
13:1713 minutes, 17 secondsalongside faith, personal conscience alongside community belonging. This path doesn't destroy Islam, it transforms it
13:2513 minutes, 25 secondsand arguably it saves it by making it something that people choose rather than something that they endure. Path two, harden. Double down on enforcement,
13:3313 minutes, 33 secondsmorality, police, censorship, blasphemy, prosecutions, harsher penalties for disscent, tighter control over digital
13:4113 minutes, 41 secondsspaces, surveillance of online religious debate. We've seen this playbook before in Iran, in Saudi Arabia before its
13:4813 minutes, 48 secondsrecent reforms, in Afghanistan under the Taliban. The enforcers always believe that if they just clamp down hard enough, the old order will hold. It
13:5613 minutes, 56 secondswon't. And history tells us why. When the printing press arrived in 16th century Europe, it didn't cause the Protestant Reformation, but it shattered
14:0414 minutes, 4 secondsthe Catholic Church's monopoly on religious information. New interpreters reached mass audiences overnight. New ideas spread faster than any institution
14:1314 minutes, 13 secondscould suppress them. The old authority didn't vanish, but it was forced to compete in a marketplace of ideas that had never had been designed for. The
14:2014 minutes, 20 secondshistorian Elizabeth Eisenstein called printing a communications revolution that transformed the scale and structure of religious contestation itself. Now
14:2914 minutes, 29 secondsthe Catholic Church responded with censorship with the index of forbidden books with inquisitions and none of it worked. The monopoly was already broken.
14:3714 minutes, 37 secondsThe internet is doing to Islamic authority what the printing press did to Rome. And the parallel is not [music] perfect. Islam has no single papacy to
splinter from. And the Muslim world is politically vast and diverse, stretching from Sagal to Indonesia. But the structural logic is identical. When a
14:5414 minutes, 54 secondscommunication revolution breaks informationational scarcity, religious authority must compete or coersse. There is no third option. And here's the cruel
15:0215 minutes, 2 secondsparadox of the hardening path. Enforced faith produces compliance. Chosen faith produces conviction. Only one of those
15:0915 minutes, 9 secondssurvives modernity. The more authority clamps down, the more it confirms the suspicion that belief requires force and the more legitimacy it bleeds. That's
15:1815 minutes, 18 secondsexactly what Iran's data reveals. Four decades of theocratic rule didn't produce a more devout population. It just produced a generation that
15:2615 minutes, 26 secondsassociates religion with oppression. And this is where the title of this video stops being provocative and starts being structural. This is the first fully
15:3515 minutes, 35 secondsdigital Muslim generation. The first raised with instant access to competing interpretations, rival moral frameworks [music] and global comparison, not
15:4315 minutes, 43 secondsbehind closed doors, but in the open on platforms that reach billions. The first generation trained from childhood to expect customization, to curate their
15:5215 minutes, 52 secondsown feeds, their own identities, their own moral worlds. The first generation that expects consent over inheritance in every domain of life, including faith.
16:0116 minutes, 1 secondThat doesn't mean they're all leaving Islam. The data is clear. Most are not.
Post a Comment