neelkanth posted: " Thanks to the author of the following writeup
KR Saini on behalf of you all for analysing threadbare the intricate
limping areas in relation to 7th bi-partite adversely affecting a large
group of pensioners. This gives a distinct picture of the is"
 Thanks
to the author of the following writeup KR Saini on behalf of you all
for analysing threadbare the intricate limping areas in relation to 7th
bi-partite adversely affecting a large group of pensioners. This gives a
distinct picture of the issue as a whole and is of great advantage to
the readers of this blog, the pensioners in general in particular who
are quite expected to peruse the contents in a right earnest sharing
them equally with others to healthfully generate the requisite awareness
on the issues:
THERE
ARE TWO MAJOR PENDING PENSION ISSUES IN S.B.I AND THEY HAVE BECOME A
SORT OF A RUNNING SEQUENCE WHICH ARE FLARING UP AGAIN AND AGAIN AND WE
REQUEST M.O.F TO HAVE THE ISSUES EXAMINED AFRESH AND I AM COVERING THESE
ISSUES AS UNDER AS THEY REGUIRE IMMEDIATE ATTENTION OF THE GOVERNMENT:
1) THE REVISION OF PENSION ON 7TH BIPARTITE PAY SCALES.
2)PAYMENT OF PENSION AT 50% OF THE LAST DRAWN AVERAGE PAY.
ISSUES OF 7TH BIPARTITE RETIRES:
THE
ISSUE OF PENSION REVISION OF 7TH BIPARTITE RETIREES IS QUITE GENUINE.
THE 7TH BIPARTITE RETIREES COMPRISE OF THOSE WHO RETIRED DRAWING SALARY
AS PER 7TH BIPARTITE WAGE SETTLEMENT(PERIOD
BETWEEN1.11.1997(AWARD)/1.04.1998(SUPERVISING)TO31.10.2002).AN INJUSTICE
HAS BEEN DONE TO THEM. THE POSITION IS EXPLAINED HEREUNDER.—
I)
THE 6TH BIPARTITE SETTLEMENT ARRIVED AT IN 1995 WAS IMPLEMENTED FROM
1.11.1992/1.7.1993. AT THAT TIME PENSION OF THOSE RETIRED WAS REVISED
WITH EFFECT FROM 1.11.1993 AND THE CEILING WAS RAISED UPWARDS FROM
RS2400/ TO RS 4250/ BY ADJUSTING OF D.A AND DIFFERENCE BETWEEN 600
POINTS OF CONSUMER PRICE INDEX(CPIN) AND 1148 POINTS.THIS REVISION WAS
IMPLEMENTED IN PRINCIPLE, ALTHOUGH IN FACT IT DID NOT SIGNIFICANTLY
CHANGE THE GROSS PENSION PAYABLE.
II) THE ABOVE CEILING OF
PENSION WAS AGAIN REVISED WITH EFFECT FROM 1.3.1999-THE NEW FORMULA WAS
INTRODUCED BY WHICH THOSE GETTING A SALARY UPTO RS8500/ WOULD GET
PENSION AT 50% OF THE SALARY AND THOSE GETTING ABOVE RS8500 WOULD GET
PENSION AT40% OF THE SALARY SUBJECT TO A MINIMUM OF RS4250/.AS A
CONSEQUENCE OF THIS, CLERKS AND OFFICERS OF THE RANK OF JMGS1 WOULD GET
PENSION AT 50% OF THE AVERAGE BASIC PAY, WHEREAS OFFICERS MMGSII ONWARDS
RECEIVED PENSION AT 40% OF THE LAST DRAWN AVERGE PAY.
III)
IN THE CASE OF 7TH BIPARTITE SETTLEMENT WHICH WAS FOR THE PERIOD FROM
1.11.1997(AWARD STAFF)/1.4.1998 (SUPERVISING STAFF) TO 31.10.2002,THE
SALARY REVISION TOOK PLACE ON14.12.1999(SUPERVISING STAFF) AND
27.03.2000(AWARD STAFF)RESPECTVELY WITH RETROSPECTIVE EFFECT. HOWEVER,
DUE TO OVERSIGHT NECESSARY CORRESPONDING REVISION OF PENSION DID NOT
TAKE PLACE FOR THESE RETIREES. THEREFORE, ALL THESE 7TH BIPARTITE
RETIREES ARE GETTING PENSION ON THE SALARY AS PER PAY SCALES OF THE 6TH
BIPARTITE SETTLEMENT AND NOT ON THEIR ACTUAL LAST DRAWN AVERAGE PAY. IN
FACT, PROVIDENT FUND ,GRATUITY AND FAMILY PENSION WERE PAID TO THESE
RETIREES ON THE BASIS OF THEIR LAST DRAWN SALARY.THIS IS THE ONLY GROUP OF PENSIONERS IN THE BANK WHICH IS NOT GETTING PENSION ON THEIR ACTUAL LAST DRAWN PAY, WHICH IS INEQUITABLE.
IV)
THE COMMITTEE ON PENSION SETUP BY THE S.B.I ON ADVICE OF GOVERNMENT OF
INDIA ALSO DELIBERATED ON THE ISSUE AND INTERACTED WITH THE BOTH
FEDERATIONS ON THE ISSUEOF REVISION OF PENSION OF 7TH BIPARTITE
RETIREES. IT RECOMMENDED TO THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA TO CONSIDER THE
ISSUE DE-NOVO. SINCE THIS ISSUE HAS NOT BEEN SETTLED TO THE SATISFACTION
OF THE 7TH BIPARTITE RETIREES, IT HAS BECOME A CONTINUING AND RECURRING
CAUSE OF FRICTIONS.
LEGAL POSITION
THE FOLLOWING ARE THE KEY POINTS FROM THE LEGAL ANGLE—-
a)
THE MANAGEMENT OF THE BANK IS REQUIRED TO REMOVE IRRITANTS THAT CREATE
DISSATISFACTION TO SENIOR PENSIONERS AND ALSO RECOMMENDED TO M.O.F FOR
REMOVING THE ANOMALIES IN PENSION ON27.04.2015.
b) SINGLING
OUT OF RETIREES DURING THE CURRENCY OF 7TH BIPARTITE SETTLEMENT IS
VIOLATIVE OF ARTICLE 14 AND 21 OF THE CONSTITUTION.
c)IT IS
LEGAL,EQUITABLE AND JUSTIFIED TO PROVIDE PENSION REVISION FOR 7TH
BIPARTITE RETIREES ON THE SAME FOOTING AS THAT OF 8TH AND 9TH BIPARTITE
RETIREES. DENYING THE SAME TO THESE RETIREES AMOUNTS TO A SHEER
DISCRIMINATION.
K.R.SAINI
Technorati Tags: statebankofindia, government, pensioners, threadbare, analying, krsaini, author, legal, position, 7thbipartite, discrimination, frictions
|
|
|
|
एक विवाहित बेटी का पत्र उसकी माँ के नाम
"माँ तुम बहुत याद आती हो"
अब मेरी सुबह 6 बजे होती है और रात 12 बज जाती है, तब
"माँ तुम बहुत याद आती हो"
सबको गरम गरम परोसती हूँ, और खुद ठंढा ही खा लेती हूँ, तब
"माँ तुम बहुत याद आती हो"
जब कोई बीमार पड़ता है तो
एक पैर पर उसकी सेवा में लग जाती हूँ,
और जब मैं बीमार पड़ती हूँ
तो खुद ही अपनी सेवा कर लेती हूँ, तब
"माँ तुम बहुत याद आती हो"
जब रात में सब सोते हैं,
बच्चों और पति को चादर ओढ़ाना नहीं भूलती,
और खुद को कोई चादर ओढाने वाला नहीं, तब
"माँ तुम बहुत याद आती हो"
सबकी जरुरत पूरी करते करते खुद को भूल जाती हूँ,
खुद से मिलने वाला कोई नहीं, तब
"माँ तुम बहुत याद आती हो"
यही कहानी हर लड़की की शायद शादी के बाद हो जाती है
कहने को तो हर आदमी शादी से पहले कहता है
"माँ की याद तुम्हें आने न दूँगा"
पर, फिर भी क्यों?
"माँ तुम बहुत याद आती हो"5
WordPress.com
