Biggest news of 2016 for Central Government pensioners

As published by Maj Navdeep Singh on his IndianMilitary.info blog:-

Revision of pension of pre-2006 Central Civil Pensioners and providing better service to pensioners.

Full Pension for Pre-2006 Pensioners with less than 33 years of Service – Update

Bharat Pensioners Samaj has released the file noting on the issue of Pro-rata pension for Pre-2006 Pensioners which states that there is no chance for review petition yielding result in favour of Govt

As per File Noting released by BPS, presently Department of Pension is of the view that Pre-2006 Pensioners’ case that they should be granted full pension if they have rendered 20 years of service at par with Post 2006 Pensiners has reached finality and Court ruling (for granting full pension) has become law of land.
We hope Department of Pension would issue OM for granting full pension for Pre-2006 Pensioners who have completed 20 years of Service

Full Pension on less than 30 years & more than 20 years of Qualifying Service for Pre-2006 pensioners

FULL PENSION FOR THOSE WITH LESS THAN 30 YEARS but MORE THAN 20 YEARS QS

In view of the fact that review Petition filed by UOI RP (C) NO. 2565/2015 in SLP (C) No. 6567/2015 UOI Vs M.O. Inasu dismissed by SC on 28.8.2015, and Following file notings of DOPW (obtained under RTI) let us hope DOP&PW will now issue necessary instructions extending benefit of full min. pension to all pre 2006 pensioners irrespective of Q.S. rendered.

The extract from the File Noting obtained from DOP&PW under RTI ACT, on pro rata pension matter.

Revision of pre-2006 JCOs/ORs pensioners/ Family pensioners: PCDA Circular No. 547

OFFICE OF THE PR. CONTROLLER OF DEFENCE ACCOUNTS (PENSIONS)

DRAUPADI GHAT, ALLAHABAD- 211014

Circular No. 547

Dated:11.09.201

Subject:- Revision of pension in r/o pre-2006 JCOs/ORs pensioners/ Family pensioners

Payment of arrears of pensions to pre-2006 pensioners w.e.f. 01.01.2006 within a week with E-Revision utility

Payment of arrears of pensions to pre-2006 pensioners w.e.f. 01.01.2006 within a week: CPAO to CPCC

Payment of arrears of pensions to Pre-2006 pensioners w.e.f. 01.01.2006: CPAO's OM

Payment of arrears of pensions to Pre-2006 pensioners w.e.f. 01.01.2006

MoD Order for Revision of Pension for Pre-2006 Commissioned Officer / Family Pensioners

Revision of pension of Pre-2006 Commissioned Officers/ family pensioners - Arrears from 01.01.2006: Ministry of Defence Order

MoD Order for Revision of Pension for Pre-2006 JCO/ORs - Table for Army, Air-force, Navy

Revision of pension in r/o of Pre-2006 JCOs/ORs Pensioners/family pensioners, Revised Table for Army, Air-force & Navy - Arrears from 01.01.2006: Ministry of Defence Order

E-Revision utility for revision of Pension of Pre-2006 Pensioners w.e.f. 01.01.2006 will available within this week: CPAO

Full Pension to Pre 2006 Pensioners with less than 33 years but more than 20 years service: Supreme Court dismisses UOI Review Petition

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition of UOI in Pro Rata Case for Full Pension to Pre 2006 Pensioners with less than 33 years but more than 20 years service

Supreme Court Dismisses (both on grounds of delay and on merit) the Review Petition of UOI for Full Pension (in stead of Pro Rata Pension) to Pre 2006 Pensioners with less than 33 years but more than 20 years service. Copies of SC orders dated 28-8-2015 & 26-8-2015 in R.P.(C) NO. 2565/2015 IN SLP(C) NO. 6567/2015 UOI vs M. O. INASU - attached

 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

R.P.(C) NO. 2565/2015

IN

SLP(C) NO. 6567/2015

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ... PETITIONER(S)

VERSUS

M. O. INASU ... RESPONDENT(S)

O R D E R

Upon perusing the paper book, it has come to our notice that there is a delay of 136 days in filing this review petition and we do not find any justifiable reasons to condone the delay. 

Even on merits, we have perused the Review Petition and the connected papers with meticulous care, we do not find any justifiable reason to entertain this review petition.

The review petition is, accordingly, dismissed on the ground of delay as well as on merits.

.................................J.

[FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA]

Signature Not Verified

Digitally signed by

Narendra Prasad

Date: 2015.08.28

14:54:57 IST

Reason: .................................J.

[ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE]

Source: Bharat Pensioner Samaj
[http://scm-bps.blogspot.in/2015/08/supreme-court-dismisses-review-petition.html]

Read more: http://www.staffnews.in/2015/08/full-pension-to-pre-2006-pensioners_30.html#ixzz3kMi5kRKN

Appeal made to PM for Full Pension to Pre 2006 Pensioners with more than 20 years of service at par with Post 2006 Pensioners

Welfare Society has put forward an appeal before Prime Minister for implementation of judgements of various Courts for Full Pension to Pre 2006 Pensioners with more than 20 years of service at par with Post 2006 Pensioners

Full Pension to Pre-2006 Pensioners when service less than 33 years

Full Pension to Pre-2006 Pensioners when service less than 33 years – Govt Appeal dismissed by Hon’ble Supreme Court 

While many Pre 2006 Pensioners with less than 33 years service have got favourable verdict from CAT and the consequent appeals by Govt are pending at various stages, Bharat Pensioners Samaj reports that SLP filed by Govt relating one of such cases against the order favourable to pre-2006 pensioner has been dismissed by Hon’ble Supreme Court. Hence it is likely that other cases would also be decided on the basis of this dismissal by Apex Court in favour of Pre 2006 Pensioners.

IESM CLARIFICATION REGARDING SC JUDGEMENT

****FASH FLASH FLASH The 3 SLP Field By UOI against pre-2006 pensioners dismissed by Supreme Court on 17/03/205 FLASH FLASH FLASH ****

ARREARS OF  PENSION  TO BE PAID  FROM 01 JAN 2006  TO   24 SEP 2012

Dear Veterans

This refers to arrears paid for increase in pension as per recommendations of 6 CPC to all employees of  of central Government w.e.f. 24 Sep 2012. 

  Government has already paid the arrears to civil employees from 1 Jan 2006. However this was denied to Armed Forces personnel on most stupid ground that the arrears will not be paid to those who had not gone to court.