ITEM NO.4 COURT NO.3 SECTION XV
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
I.A.Nos.7-8 In Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).29956-
29957/2011
(From the judgement and order dated 19/08/2011 in DBSA No.493/2010,DBSA
No.494/2010,DBCRP No.86/2011,DBCRP No.87/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF
RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR)
L.I.C. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
KRISHNA MURARI LAL ASTHANA & ORS. ETC. Respondent(s)
(For directions and with prayer for interim relief and office report)
Date: 15/04/2013 These I.As were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SINGHVI
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHARAD ARVIND BOBDE
For Petitioner(s) Dr.A.M.Singhvi, Sr.Adv.
Mr. Ashok Panigrahi, Adv.
For Respondent(s) Mr.Shiv Kumar Sharma, Sr.Adv.
Dr.Abhinav Sharma, Adv.
Mr.Raj Kumar Singh, Adv.
Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, Adv.
UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
In our view, no case is made out for issuing any further
direction to the petitioner in the matter of deposit of the amount in terms
of the initial order passed by the Court.
The applications are accordingly dismissed.
(Satish K.Yadav) (Phoolan Wati Arora)
Court Master Court Master
Note: In view of the above interim order of SC, please do not expect that LIC would deposit
more than 20% of what was deposited in the Registries of Jaipur HC & P&H HC Chandigarh.
As stated in the Flash News by Shri R B Kishore, LIC will seek clarification from SC
with regard to Delhi HC to ascertain the petitioner pensioners.
Ed.
