this THURSDAY THOROUGHNESS = OF UNDERSTANDING THE 100% DA CASE latest dev.s + RETIREES WANT Mr.VK BALI ALSO SHOULD BE INVOLVED

The U.P. RETD ASSNS. CIRCULAR (see in attachment) & THE CBPRO CLIPPING (as below)

both furnished distorted/half cooked news thrown retirees in dilemma, but all in grand jubilation on - RECALLING THEIR EARLIER DISMISSAL ON LINES OF MADRAS HIGH COURT FULL JUDGEMENT - as heard or understood.

CBPRO Circular No.013/2017 Dated: 14.08.2017

Dear Comrades,

Sub: 100% DA Case

Review Petition of Bank of Baroda Retired Officers Association, Balakrishna Bhatt & others heard in the Open Court of Supreme Court on 14th. Earlier Judgement recalled.

The case is posted to 23rd August and will be heard again. Senio Advocate Ms Mohana represented Applicants/Appellants. Advocate Shri Sewaram was also present to coordinate and assist.

We were also present in the Court. We also understand one more review petition is pending in the said case. We are in touch with their organisations so that we can coordinate with all Applicants/ Appellants.

With Regards

Yours Comradely,

A Ramesh Babu K V Acharya,

Joint Conveners (CBPRO)

BUT THAT ALSO NOT CORRECT AND THE SUPREME COURT  IS TAKING UP OF REVIEW PETITION OF BANK OF BARODA RETIREES ASSN ON 23RD INSTANT and THE ORDER OF 14TH AUGUST AS FOLLOWS>

“ We find that after orders ought to be
reviewed was passed (on 2nd august), another matter viz .
S. L. P. ( C) No( s) . 7368- 7371 of 2017, United
Bank of India v . United Bank of India
Retirees Welfare Association and Ors . ,
involving similar question has been heard and
order reserved on 1st August , 2017. In view of above development , we are
of the view that these review petitions ought to be heard in the open court , preferably
before the same Bench which has reserved the above matter to avoid any possible conflict
in the view of this Court ."

THAT IS HEARING CASE OF BOB.RA REVIEW PETITION 1st listed on 14th august when it is intended to be dismissed like a case ON  3RD May2017, BUT CALLED FOR HEARING ON 23RD AUGUST IN LIGHT OF UBIRA CASE HEARD ON 1ST AUG.

iT WAS BROUGHT THAT ACC. MR. KASTURIRANGAN, THE CASE WAS POSTED FOR 22ND AUGUST, THAT ALSO CORRECT, BUT IT RELATES TO 'ONE MORE REVIEW PETITION' AS REFERRED BY CBPRO AND THAT RELATES TO IOB RETIREES REVIW PETITION.

U.P.R.A  referring kasturirangan and CBPRO referring BOB retirees, also confused RETIREES.

AS ALL KNOW IN MADRAS HIGH COURT THE BOB, IOB, CANARA BANK RETIEES FILED AND LASTLY DISMISSED BY SUPREME COURT WITH COMMON ORDER.

BUT THE THREE FILED REVIEW PETITIONS SEPARATELY AND TAKEN UP SEPARATELY AS FOLLOWS.  THE AB KASTURIRANGAN REVIEW PETITION CASE ALREADY DISMISSED ON 3RD MAY 2017 BY SUPREME COURT AS FOLLOWS:

WITH REJECTION OF HEARING AGAIN AS HAPPEND IN SLP CASE.

THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
REVIEW PETITION (CIVIL) NOS.1045-1046 OF 2017
IN
CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 8420-8421 OF 2013
A.B. KASTHURIRANGAN & ORS. ⬠¦Petitioners
VERSUS
CANARA BANK & ORS. ⬠¦Respondents
O R D E R

Applications seeking oral hearing of review petitions
are rejected.
We have carefully gone through the review petitions and
the connected papers. However, we do not find any merit in
the review petitions. Accordingly, the review petitions are
dismissed.
..........................
.J.
[ ADARSH KUMAR GOEL ]
...............⬠¦...........J.
[ PRAFULLA C. PANT ]
NEW DELHI
MAY 3, 2017

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

INCIDENTALLY, THE 1ST JUDGE IN BOTH CB, BOB, IOB DISMISSAL CASE AND NOW UBIRA CASE IS SAME BUT THE 2ND JUDGE NOT SAME PERSON.

NOW THE IOB REVIEW PETITITON IS ON 22ND AUGUST AS FOLLOW, HAVE TO BE TAGGED ON 23RD WITH BOBs.

C.R. CHANDRASEKARAN vs. INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR AND ORS

Case Details

Diary No.	8268/2017 Filed on 11-03-2017 12:20 PM Pending    [SECTION: XII]
Case No.	R.P.(C) No. 001201 / 2017  Registered on 01-05-2017
Present/Last Listed On
Status/Stage	Pending (Motion Hearing [FRESH (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES])
Tentatively case may be listed on	22-08-2017 (Computer generated)
Category	0601-Service Matters : Retiral benefits
Act
Petitioner(s)	1 C.R. CHANDRASEKARAN   NO. 83, NEW NO. 64, ELLAYAMMAN COLONY, VELLALA TEYNAMPET , Chennai , TAMIL NADU
Respondent(s)	1 INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR AND ORS   CENTRAL OFFICER, 762, ANNA SALAI , Chennai , TAMIL NADU   2 THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY FOR PENSION REGULATIONS (GENERAL MANAGER)   INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK, CENTRAL OFFICER, 763, ANNA SALAI , Chennai , TAMIL NADU   3 INDIAN BANKS ASSOCIATION THROUGH ADVISOR HR AND IR   WORLD TRADE CENTRE COMPLEX, 6TH FLOOR, CENTRE 1 BUILDING, CUFF PARADE , Mumbai , MAHARASHTRA
Pet. Advocate(s)	G. INDIRA

AND, NOW THE BOB RETIREES CASE POSITION AS FOLLOWS:

R. BALAKRISHNA BHAT AND ORS ETC vs. BANK OF BARODA AND ORS

Case Details

Diary No.	22309/2017 Filed on 26-07-2017 12:57 PM Pending    [SECTION: XII]
Case No.	R.P.(C) No. 001592 - 001594 / 2017  Registered on 01-08-2017
Present/Last Listed On	14-08-2017 [HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT]
Status/Stage	Pending - (Motion Hearing [AFTER NOTICE (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES]) List On (Date) (23-08-2017), Other (Order dated 1/2/2017 recalled and list the Appeal for final hearing on 23/8/2017)-Ord dt:14-08-2017
Tentatively case may be listed on	23-08-2017

IN VIEW OF EXCELENT PRESENTATION OF MR.V.K.BALI, APART FROM MR. SEWARAM, RETIREES WANT MR.V.K.BALI SHOULD ALSO BE INVOLVED IN 23RD AUGUST PROCEEDINGS.

(cbpro : Shri V.K. Bali, Senior Advocate (Former Chief Justice of Kerala High Court and Former Chairman of Central Administrative Tribunal), who represented AIBRF, argued the case excellently. His arguments were able to impress the Court about the distinctions made out in Para2(b) of the Bipartite Settlement of May, 2005 in respect of applicability of uniform rate of D.A. and the distortions in its implementations vide IBA Circular dated 28.06.2005 going against the spirit of the Bipartite Settlement. The clauses relating to payment of uniform D.A. from May, 2005 in the Bipartite Settlement and Joint note did not stipulate any cut-off date with regard to exclusion of Pre-November 2002 Retirees )

 = VBV Ramesh