PENSIONERS' VOICE AND SOUND TRACK APPEALS YOU "USE MASK""KEEP SOCIAL DISTANCE" "GHAR BATHO ZINDA RAHO" "STAY HOME SAVE LIVES"
DEAR FRIENDS, CONGRATS, YOUR BLOG CROSSED 3268000 HITS ON 01.02.2023 THE BLOG WAS LAUNCHED ON 23.11.2014,HAVE A GREAT DAY
VISIT 'PENSIONERS VOICE & SOUND TRACK' WAY TO CATCH UP ON PENSIONER RELATED NEWS!

Wednesday, 20 June 2018

Re: High Court Supreme Court? - IN REM?

It is High court of Rajasthan at Jaipur 


On Wed, 20 Jun 2018 at 12:17 PM, RK SAHNI
<rksahni278@yahoo.co.in> wrote:


Dear Mr Sahni,
     Para 2 of this letter starts off with : "....pursuant to the order of the Hon'ble High Court in M. C. Jain case...." and makes reference again to the High Court and a portion of the concluding paragraph has : "....decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in LIC Vs M.C.Jain [SLP (C) CC 8090/2014]...." 
     (Emphasis supplied --- P. R.)
     which is the court concerned, please - High (BOMBAY?) or Supreme?
     The legal opinion obtained by LIC is to the effect that what is applicable to M.C.Jain (alone) cannot be made applicable to others similarly placed.
     How about Mr K. D. Arya telling LIC that the legal opinion obtained by HIM is to the effect that what is applicable to M. C. Jain is applicable to all those others similarly placed, please? (in rem?).
     Thanks and regards.
P. Ramanathan.




No comments: