DOUBLE TONGUE TALK BY GOI

DEAR SHRI MURTHY

THESE PERSONS ARE TRYING TO INVOKE RULE 56 OF THE PENSION RULES WHILE

IT IS NO USE FOR US. THAT IS WHY STAND IS SEPARATE FROM THEM WHICH THEY

HAVE EITHER NOT BEEN ABLE TO UNDERSTAND OR DO NOT WANT. WHEN THE

PENSION RULES AND PAY SCALE NOTIFICATIONS ARE READ TOGETHER THE 

PENSION WILL HAVE TO BE UPDATED ON EVERY WAGE REVISION. THESE PETITIONERS

HAVE COME IN FREE FLOW OF THE CASE BUT JUST TO CREATE HINDRANCES. THEY

ARE INTERESTED IN DA DR ANOMALY AND NOT PENSION REVISION WHICH CAN BE

SEEN WHEN ON 30TH JULY 2018 THEY MADE REQUEST FOR GRANT OF 60% OF DR

DIFFERENCE AS PER DHC JUDGMENT AND HAVE ALSO PLEADED ON DR BEFORE DHC

THESE PERSONS ALSO DO NOT UNDERSTAND THAT WHEN THE MATTER IS LEFT TO

UOI TO AMEND RULES THERE IS NO LIKELIHOOD THAT UOI WILL AMEND THE RULES

AS WE DEMAND, AN EXAMPLE OF THIS IS SC/ST CASE. IN CASE A CLEAR PROVISION

IS MADE OF NO REVISION THEN THERE WILL REMAIN NOTHING BUT FRESH LITIGATION. 

YOURS SINCERELY,

KML ASTHANA