1
ITEM NO.41 & 42 COURT NO.1 SECTION X/PILW
S U P R E M E C
O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD
OF PROCEEDINGS
WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S). 1309/2018
ALOK
KUMAR VERMA PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS
UNION OF
INDIA & ANR. RESPONDENT(S)
(FOR ADMISSION AND IA NO.154705/2018-EX-PARTE STAY)
WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1315 OF 2018 [ITEM NO.42]
FOR ADMISSION AND I.A. NO.155145/2018 – APPROPRIATE
ORDERS/DIRECTIONS
Date : 26-10-2018
These petitions were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE THE
CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE MR.
JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
HON'BLE MR.
JUSTICE K.M. JOSEPH
For parties:
Mr. F.S. Nariman, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Gopal Sankaranarayanan, Adv.
Ms. Pooja Dhar, AOR
Ms. Aishwarya Kane, Adv.
Ms. Gayatri Verma, Adv.
Mr. Sanjay R. Hegde,Sr. Adv.
Mr. Pranjal Kishore, Adv.
Ms. Pooja Dhar, AOR
Mr. K.K. Venugopal, AG
Mr. Tushar Mehta, SG
Mr. R. Balasubramanian, Adv.
Mr. Sachin Sharma, Adv.
Mr. L. Charanya, Adv.
Ms. Aarti Sharma, Adv.
Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR
CVC
Mr. Tushar Mehta, SG
Mr. Rajat Nair, Adv.
Mr. Kanu Agrawal, Adv.
Ms. Tatini Basu, AOR
Ms. Deepanvita Priyanka, Adv.
Ms. Swati Ghildiyal, Adv.
2
Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, Sr. Adv.
Mr. A. Sharan, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Amit Anand Tiwari, AOR.
Ms. Mary Mitzy, Adv.
Mr. Shashwat Singh, Adv.
Mr. Dushyant Dave, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Prashant Bhushan, AOR.
Mr. Pranav Sachdeva, Adv.
Mr. Rohit K. Singh, Adv.
Ms. Surabhi Kumari, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
Heard the learned counsels for the petitioners and
perused the relevant material.
Issue notice in both the writ petitions.
The matters shall be listed immediately after the
Diwali Holidays i.e. on 12th
November, 2018.
Having heard the learned counsels for the parties at some
length, we are of the view that the following interim arrangement should govern
the situation.
1.
The enquiry in respect of the allegations made in
the note/letter of the Cabinet Secretary dated 24th
August,2018 as regards the present Director, Central Bureau of Investigation
(“CBI”) Shri Alok Verma shall be completed by the Central Vigilance Commission
(“CVC”) within a period of two weeks from today. The enquiry will be conducted
under
the supervision of a retired judge of this Court Shri Justice
A.K. Patnaik who is requested to accept the assignment and ensure that enquiry
is completed within the time frame fixed by this Court.
2. The respondent No.6 – M. Nageshwar Rao in Writ
Petition (Civil) No.1315 of 2018 who has been entrusted with
the task of looking after the duties of the Director of the CBI by the impugned
order dated 23rd
October, 2018 of the Secretary, Department of personnel & Training, shall,as
of from now, not take any policy decision(s) or any major decision(s) and will
only perform the routine tasks that are essential to keep the CBI functional. A list of all
the decisions taken by the respondent No. 6 – M. Nageshwar Rao between 23rd
October, 2018 and upto this hour including decisions with regard to transfer of
investigations, change of Investigating Officer(s), etc. etc. will be furnished
to the Court in a sealed cover on or before 12th
November, 2018 whereafter orders as would be appropriate will be passed by the
Court.
We make it clear that entrustment of supervision of
on-going enquiry by the C.V.C. to a former judge of this Court
is one-time exception which has been felt necessary by this Court in the
peculiar facts of this case and should not be understood to be casting any
reflection on any authority of the Government of India.
[VINOD LAKHINA] [ASHA SONI]
AR-cum-PS
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
No comments:
Post a Comment