A weary experience for all

The leaned gentleman appears to be a lawyer by profession and qualification and wrote a very elaborate article. In the opening of the article he has mentioned that upto HC level we were on right track. That means we are not on right trac in SC. 

One thing we know for sure that in HC we have lost. The HC judgement does have a sort of finality. Therefore, if we go by the logic the gentleman has given we don't have any case. As per his logic we can't contest our case on points other than those we used in the HC. If the points contained in the  lengthy article of the learned gentleman had already taken up in the HC, we have already lost the case. If not used, how we were on right track?

Since, the learned gentleman is an expert and appears to be a trained lawyer by profession and qualification, I can't argue with him. 

With profound regards.

VS Sikarwar