DEAR FRIENDS, CONGRATS, YOUR BLOG CROSSED 4005000 HITS ON 12.10.2025 THE BLOG WAS LAUNCHED ON 23.11.2014,HAVE A GREAT DAY
VISIT 'PENSIONERS VOICE & SOUND TRACK' WAY TO CATCH UP ON PENSIONER RELATED NEWS!

Tuesday, 8 September 2015

Follow up on SC Order dt 7/8/2015

Arising out of the  categorical order of SC of 7/9/2015, the question that now arises is what will the various sets of Respondents and the AIRIEF will do.
As far as the Chandigarh petitioners are concerned, their  stand is very clear.The impugned judgment  requires 20% of arrears of  upgraded pension is required to be paid  within 2 weeks.

As far as the Jaipur case is concerned,as the IR (whatever  the amount) has been paid to only 22 original petitioners.As per the impugned Jaipur SJB Order,not only these 22 petitioners were required to be paid  IR based on  a much higher amount on account of upgradation with weightage in chain,but also on  the same basis ,the remaining 5 post-July 1997 retirees are also required to be paid IR based on the Jaipur judgment.Will Mr K ML Asthana and AIRIEF press for payment of the right amount to  all eligible petitioners?If  that does not happen,the post-July 1997 petitioners will get orphaned besides the pre-August 1997 petitioners  having to be content with a paltry amount of relief.In the absence of impleadment of the AIRIEF in the CAs in Supreme Court,the Federation  has to recognise that  in the present schemes of things,the fortune of the its large number of  members is closely linked to and dependent on the fortunes of Mr Asthana and 26 others through the case outcome. 

As far as the Federation of Retired Class I Officers' Associations is concerned,  are they now going  to pursue with LIC to pay 20%  of  the due amount as ordered by the SC to all eligible pensioners  keeping scrupulously in view the Delhi High Court  order directing  that the amounts  due should be  be paid in rem?
While the list submitted to LIC  may contain 1266 names of members belonging to the pre-August 1997 category,once LIC decides to pay to these 1266 retiree members of the Federation,the question also arises as to what will happen to retired Class I Officers who are not members of the Federation.
Once LIC decides to waive their self-prescibed criteria,they are logically obliged to pay IR to eligible retirees of Class II,Class Iii & Class IV cadres also.There may be close to 15000 pre  August 1997 retirees in all the cadres  put together.

Here all the Associations/Pensioners' bodies/Federations -whether they are involved in the ongoing litigation or not-have a compelling  moral responsibility to ensure that all the 42000+ eligible pensioners obtain justice,especially when the OROP issue has been successfully  resolved by the Government  to benefit more than 25 lks ex-military personnel..

Let us see what the waiting pensioners have in store for them in the two weeks ahead.
Greetings.
C H Mahadevan