We have not misled anybody.We have made an appeal only in the name of our Retired Class I Officers' Association, Hyderabad.We don't want to take innocent pensioners for a ride.We will be only too happy if AIRIEF also takes the lead as a Federation and not merely support an individual,as there are thousands of stakeholders in the legal fight.
Mr
Murty and I are also life members of AIRIEF and are anxious to know
what are the action plans of AIRIEF post SC judgment dated 31/3/2016.
Kind regards.
C H Mahadevan
On Thursday, April 21, 2016, H K Aggarwal <aggarwalhk@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, April 21, 2016, H K Aggarwal <aggarwalhk@hotmail.com> wrote:
From: aggarwalhk@hotmail.com
To: rbkseetha@yahoo.com
Subject: RE: PGG PC Appeal of CHM/ MSMURTY RESPONSE & Retd LIC CLASS I OFFICERS ASSN HYDERABAD ALLOWED AS ANOTHER PARTY BY SC
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 17:33:54 +0530
Dear Sh RB Kishore,
There must be some proceedings of the mention made.
Do you agree what Sh Sreenivasa Murty M has said in his
mail below. Please enlighten the common members. It appears to be misleading just to get collections from innocent pensioners, who have misunderstood appeal of Sh Mahadevan having been done for AIRIEF.
There are already number of cooks, let them unite and have a
HEAD COOK ( ie, ONE SENIOR ADVOCATE on behalf of all the parties/petitioners/and their case managers to get expeditious results. AIRIEF will have to take the lead taking Sh KML Asthana, the Crusader in confidence.
With best wishes and kind regards,
H K Aggarwal.
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 07:36:30 +0000
From: rbkseetha@yahoo.com
To:
Subject: PGG PC Appeal of CHM/ MSMURTY RESPONSE & Retd LIC CLASS I OFFICERS ASSN HYDERABAD ALLOWED AS ANOTHER PARTY BY SCIn fact, by now AIRIEF & Sri KMLA COULD HAVE MET SR COUNSEL TO GET HIS ADVICE & COURSE OF ACTION ,IN READINESS TO KEEP READY AFFIDAVIT OR ADDL APPLICATIONS TO AMEND ORIGINAL WRIT & SPECIFIC CASE STUDIES & SUBMISSIONS WHERE HON JUSTICE MISRA WANTED SR COUNSEL TO MAKE MORE SUBMISSIONS, TO COMPLETE THE INCOMPLETE PLEADINGS &SC ORDER DT 31/3/2016 CONTAINS AREAS WHICH HAVE TO BE REFURBISHED,POLISHED & MODIFIED TO DRIVE HOME THE TWIN BENEFITS & HOW LIC.UOI ACTION GOES AGAINST THE GRAIN OF DISCRIMINATION & NULLIFIES OR ABROGATES fUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS ARTICLES 14, 16 & 21 OF CONSTN
EQUALLY CARE IN DRIVING HOME RULE 56, RULE 55 A & B to PROVE LIC CHAIRMANS POWER DELEGATED UNDER SEC 48 ALREADY & similar provision in CCS Rules of CG to be quoted in extensoGREETINGSRBKISHOREVP,AIRIEF ------------------------IN THE SUPREME BEFORE JUSTICE MISRA'S BENCHDear Editor,
On behalf of the Hyderabad Association, a mention was made by Mr Saurav Aggarwal, Advocate, before the Bench at 10.30 AM today.
Justice Misra asked for details and heard us patiently. He said we are free to file our pleadings in Delhi High Court, along with others. Upon enquiry, if the Order 'disposed of' may be elaborated, he smiled and asked LIC counsel Ashok Panigrahi what has he to say. Ashok said My lord their IA was for intervention and disposed of would only mean 'allowed'.
Then he directed Ashok to support and not oppose, our plea to Appear before Delhi HC. To that, Ashok agreed with a broad smile.
Finally Justice Misra asked our counsel, 'you file your pleadings claiming you are admitted by us and come back and mention before us if you face any problem'.
We left profusely thanking the Bench.
In effect in the place of the earlier order which said the 'IAs are disposed of', by virtue of today's open court directions, the Hyderabad Association stands as a party to the proceedings, on par with the other three original Respondents in LIC's three Civil Appeals.
We now move to Delhi High Court for further action.
I am in Delhi today & tomorrow to chalk out specific further actin program as per the mandate I got from Hyderabad Association.
Sreenivasa Murty M
Camp: New Delhi
No comments:
Post a Comment