Dear sri Asthana ji 13-9-18
I have read ur post ur title is " FABRICATED " arrears . what exactly it means ? It is totally
"
underpayment " " inadequate payment " " denial of legally due
payment " and any other word can be coined to express the
disgust of the pensioners. All this because of the contempt with
which LIC higher ups treat the directions from SC/HC . . The legal
dept at CO gives misinterpretations . U continued Contempt
petitions at Rajasthan HC . All top brass simply escaped . The court
fully protected them .
One reason for this situation is " about 12000 employees still in service did
not opt for pension. The attempt by ex chairman SK Roy to get
them into the scheme failed . So there is one disgruntled section
of employees at Secretary, ZM, ED levels. Another unfavourable
situation - persons at the helm of affairs refuse to understand
the submissions by us.
The MD and Chairman never assert . Pensioners issue is not at all in their agenda .
Our
case is not a political one. No politician is involved . So Even at
SC level we are not properly heard . The SC cannot allot enough
time .
On 30-7-18 the A SG simply gave an undertaking and left . There was no clear cut order by Sc
So haphazard interpretation go to court again and again produce another order .
Everybody is aware of the atrocities being committed by LIC .
HOW TO SEE THAT THE SC GIVES UNDIVIDED ATTENTION ?
Several types of data prepared by Sri CH Mahadevan . None from CO does not want to even look into
U
are also one of the petitioners at SC u wanted to argue the case
for urself . See on 11-10-18 whether us can draw the attention
of SC .
I
sent applications under RTI to All the 8 ZOs, 122 DOs and CO
requesting for data on implementation of CO circulars dt 18-8-18
and 1-9-18
Thanking u
y/s
cs murty
On Thursday, September 13, 2018
09:44:23 AM IST, KML ASTHANA
wrote:
DEAR SIR
FIRST OF ALL I WISH YOU ALL A VERY HAPPY GANESH CHATURTHI.
FURTHER I WANT TO KNOW AS TO WHETHER ANY ACTION HAS
BEEN TAKEN IN CONNECTION WITH FABRICATED PAYMENTS OF
ARREARS UNIMAGINABLE. MANY PERSONS WHO HAD BEEN
PAID 40% HAVE BEEN DENIED. iN ONE CASE COMMUTATION OF
PENSION AMOUNT HAS BEEN PAID, THE ARREARS HAVE BEEN
PAID FROM JANUARY 2007 WHILE IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN PAID FROM
DECEMBER 1998? SOME ONE HAS BEEN PAID rS. 52000 OR SO ON
THE BASIC PENSION RS 4700 AND SOME ONE HAVE BEEN RS 2
LAKHS ON THE BASIC PENSION OF RS. 5200
KML ASTHANA
VICE PRESIDENT
No comments:
Post a Comment