Our case came up at 12. No Sr. advocate other than Nidesh Guptaji
present in court. Mr. Gupta started his arguments effectively. Justice
asked do u challenge rule to have benefit of pension upgradation. mr.
Gupta read our prayer very clear covering all aspects and vide range. He
quoted the purpose of pension from various judgements and
discrimination in pension to zm vs asstt. The first time I saw court hearing advocate silently and carefully. The court asked clarification on
classification point to which Mr. Gupta replied effectively and to
satisfaction of bench. Mr. Gupta quoted various judgements fvg our
prayers. Many times judges consulted and asked some clarification very
politely. Otherwise Jus. Khanna had been very harsh and not allow to
speak adv. but the bench heard him carefully.
Earlier in start bench outright rejected the hyd ass. jr. adv request and said nothing doing.
Various cases Guptaji quoted to support that any classification is illegal on any basis.
B.ANGURAJAN
Earlier in start bench outright rejected the hyd ass. jr. adv request and said nothing doing.
Various cases Guptaji quoted to support that any classification is illegal on any basis.
B.ANGURAJAN
No comments:
Post a Comment